Literature DB >> 27727062

Further validation and reliability testing of the Rotator Cuff Quality of Life Index (RC-QOL) according to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.

Breda H Eubank1, Nicholas G Mohtadi2, Mark R Lafave3, J Preston Wiley2, J C Herbert Emery4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Rotator Cuff Quality of Life Index (RC-QOL) was developed to evaluate quality of life in patients with rotator cuff disorders (RCD). The purpose of this study was to provide additional reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in accordance with the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.
METHODS: Preliminary patient interviews included 15 patients. Seventy patients (mean age, 58; standard deviation, 9 years) with RCD were evaluated. Methodology testing included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, content validity, and construct validity. Responsiveness, interpretability, and generalizability were also analyzed.
RESULTS: The Cronbach α was 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.99; range, 0.72-0.94). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the RC-QOL was 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.85; range, 0.77-0.88). The standard error of measurement was 8 (range, 7-13). The smallest detectable change was 3 (range, 2-4). Content validity was confirmed through standardized patient interviews. All a priori hypotheses were confirmed. No floor or ceiling effects were present. The minimally clinical important difference ranged between 7 and 14 points. The study met the COSMIN criteria for interpretability and generalizability.
CONCLUSION: The RC-QOL is a reliable and valid measure of health-related quality of life in patients with chronic RCD. The results of this study added to the methodologic quality assessment of the RC-QOL, completing 7 of 10 COSMIN criteria. Crown
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  psychometric assessment; quality of life; reliability; rotator cuff; shoulder; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27727062     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  5 in total

1.  Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Rotator Cuff Quality of Life Index (RC-QOL) in patients with rotator cuff disorders.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Chen Zhang; Lin Cui; Qing-Yun Xie; Zhen-Yu Jia; Wei Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Evaluating quality of care for patients with rotator cuff disorders.

Authors:  Breda H F Eubank; Mark R Lafave; J Preston Wiley; David M Sheps; Aaron J Bois; Nicholas G Mohtadi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Cross-cultural adaptions and measurement properties of the WORC (Western Ontario rotator cuff index): a systematic review.

Authors:  Rochelle Furtado; Joy C MacDermid; Goris Nazari; Dianne M Bryant; Kenneth J Faber; George S Athwal
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  The responsiveness and validity of the Rotator Cuff Quality of Life (RC-QOL) index in a 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Caitlin D Richards; Breda H F Eubank; Mark R Lafave; J Preston Wiley; Aaron J Bois; Nicholas G Mohtadi
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 5.  How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Rocio Aldon-Villegas; Carmen Ridao-Fernández; Dolores Torres-Enamorado; Gema Chamorro-Moriana
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.