Literature DB >> 27726978

Incorporation of microplastics from litter into burrows of Lumbricus terrestris.

Esperanza Huerta Lwanga1, Hennie Gertsen2, Harm Gooren2, Piet Peters2, Tamás Salánki3, Martine van der Ploeg2, Ellen Besseling4, Albert A Koelmans4, Violette Geissen2.   

Abstract

Pollution caused by plastic debris is an urgent environmental problem. Here, we assessed the effects of microplastics in the soil surface litter on the formation and characterization of burrows built by the anecic earthworm Lumbricus terrestris in soil and quantified the amount of microplastics that was transported and deposited in L. terrestris burrows. Worms were exposed to soil surface litter treatments containing microplastics (Low Density Polyethylene) for 2 weeks at concentrations of 0%, 7%, 28%, 45% and 60%. The latter representing environmentally realistic concentrations found in hot spot soil locations. There were significantly more burrows found when soil was exposed to the surface treatment composed of 7% microplastics than in all other treatments. The highest amount of organic matter in the walls of the burrows was observed after using the treatments containing 28 and 45% microplastics. The highest microplastic bioturbation efficiency ratio (total microplastics (mg) in burrow walls/initial total surface litter microplastics (mg)) was found using the concentration of 7% microplastics, where L. terrestris introduced 73.5% of the surface microplastics into the burrow walls. The highest burrow wall microplastic content per unit weight of soil (11.8 ± 4.8 g kg-1) was found using a concentration of 60% microplastics. L. terrestris was responsible for size-selective downward transport when exposed to concentrations of 7, 28 and 45% microplastics in the surface litter, as the fraction ≤50 μm microplastics in burrow walls increased by 65% compared to this fraction in the original surface litter plastic. We conclude that the high biogenic incorporation rate of the small-fraction microplastics from surface litter into burrow walls causes a risk of leaching through preferential flow into groundwater bodies. Furthermore, this leaching may have implications for the subsequent availability of microplastics to terrestrial organisms or for the transport of plastic-associated organic contaminants in soil. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbricus terrestris burrows; Microplastics; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27726978     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  16 in total

1.  Oxidative stress, energy metabolism and molecular responses of earthworms (Eisenia fetida) exposed to low-density polyethylene microplastics.

Authors:  Andrés Rodríguez-Seijo; João P da Costa; Teresa Rocha-Santos; Armando C Duarte; Ruth Pereira
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Microplastics as an emerging threat to terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors:  Anderson Abel de Souza Machado; Werner Kloas; Christiane Zarfl; Stefan Hempel; Matthias C Rillig
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 10.863

3.  Evolutionary implications of microplastics for soil biota.

Authors:  Matthias C Rillig; Anderson Abel de Souza Machado; Anika Lehmann; Uli Klümper
Journal:  Environ Chem       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.088

4.  Microplastic Incorporation into Soil in Agroecosystems.

Authors:  Matthias C Rillig; Rosolino Ingraffia; Anderson A de Souza Machado
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Microplastic transport in soil by earthworms.

Authors:  Matthias C Rillig; Lisa Ziersch; Stefan Hempel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Impacts of Microplastics on the Soil Biophysical Environment.

Authors:  Anderson Abel de Souza Machado; Chung Wai Lau; Jennifer Till; Werner Kloas; Anika Lehmann; Roland Becker; Matthias C Rillig
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Identification and quantification of macro- and microplastics on an agricultural farmland.

Authors:  Sarah Piehl; Anna Leibner; Martin G J Löder; Rachid Dris; Christina Bogner; Christian Laforsch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Microplastics Reduce Short-Term Effects of Environmental Contaminants. Part II: Polyethylene Particles Decrease the Effect of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons on Microorganisms.

Authors:  Julia Kleinteich; Sven Seidensticker; Nikolaj Marggrander; Christiane Zarfl
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Environmental fate, toxicity and risk management strategies of nanoplastics in the environment: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Liuwei Wang; Wei-Min Wu; Nanthi S Bolan; Daniel C W Tsang; Yang Li; Muhan Qin; Deyi Hou
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 10.588

Review 10.  A catchment-scale perspective of plastic pollution.

Authors:  Fredric M Windsor; Isabelle Durance; Alice A Horton; Richard C Thompson; Charles R Tyler; Steve J Ormerod
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 10.863

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.