| Literature DB >> 27726089 |
Suzana Maria Loures de Oliveira Marcionilio1, Karine Borges Machado1, Fernanda Melo Carneiro2, Manuel Eduardo Ferreira3, Priscilla Carvalho4, Ludgero Cardoso Galli Vieira5, Vera Lúcia de Moraes Huszar6, João Carlos Nabout7.
Abstract
Chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) has been widely used in the assessment and monitoring of aquatic environments. Local and regional factors can influence Chl-a concentrations; moreover, the connection between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems is a major paradigm within aquatic ecology. Here, we investigate the spatial distribution of Chl-a concentrations in a tropical savannah floodplain in Central Brazil using a broad spatial data set (a 900-km north-south transect; 30 lakes). We determine the relative importance of local environmental variables (limnological and morphometric) and regional (land use) and spatial distances (spatial eigenvector) on Chl-a concentrations using partial linear regression. We evaluate the direct and indirect effects of local and regional variables on Chl-a with a path analysis. Our results indicate spatially autocorrelated patterns wherein lakes in closer proximity showed more similar levels of Chl-a than more distant lakes. Local environmental factors explained most variance in Chl-a (R 2adj = 0.28; P = 0.02); more specifically, both lake area and total nitrogen significantly (P < 0.05) explained Chl-a concentrations (direct effects). Meanwhile, regional factors neither directly nor indirectly predicted Chl-a. Thus, internal processes, such as the resuspension of sediment (which is frequent in tropical floodplains), rather than external influences, were the main factors that explained Chl-a concentrations in this study. The importance of local variables in structuring Chl-a concentration may be used to guide the conservation of the aquatic ecosystems in these tropical floodplain lakes.Entities:
Keywords: Araguaia River Basin; Direct effect; Lake area; Land use; Spatial eigenvector; Total nitrogen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27726089 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5622-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Monit Assess ISSN: 0167-6369 Impact factor: 2.513