| Literature DB >> 27725834 |
Ahmed Elsadek Fakhr1, Maha Kamal Gohar1, Amal Hassan Atta1.
Abstract
Fecal contamination of drinking water is a major health problem which accounts for many cases of diarrhea mainly in infants and foreigners. This contamination is a complex interaction of many parameters. Antibiotic resistance among bacterial isolates complicates the problem. The study was done to identify fecal contamination of drinking water by Diarrheagenic Antibiotic-Resistant Escherichia coli in Zagazig city and to trace reasons for such contamination, three hundred potable water samples were investigated for E. coli existence. Locations of E. coli positive samples were investigated in relation to population density, water source, and type of water pipe. Sixteen E. coli strains were isolated. Antibiotic sensitivity was done and enterotoxigenic, enteropathogenic, and enterohaemorrhagic virulence genes were investigated by PCR. Probability of fecal contamination correlated with higher population density, with increased distance from Zagazig water plant, and with asbestos cement water pipes. Resistance to at least one antimicrobial drug was found in all isolates. Virulence genes were detected in a rate of 26.27%, 13.13%, 20%, 6.67%, and 33.33% for LT, ST, stx1, stx2, and eae genes, respectively. This relatively high frequency of fecal contamination points towards the high risk of developing diarrhea by antibiotic resistant DEC in low socioeconomic communities particularly with old fashion distribution systems.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27725834 PMCID: PMC5048019 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6240703
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Microbiol
Figure 1Location of Zagazig city in Arab Republic of Egypt (ARE) and its 3 districts.
Figure 2The positive E. coli isolates in relation to population density of different regions of Zagazig city.
PCR primer sequences, their related gene targets, and expected amplification products size.
| Virulence genes | Primer sequence (5′-3′) | Product size (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| Heat labile toxin 1 (LT1) | F: TTACGGCGTTACTATCCTCTCTA | 322 |
| R: CCATACTGATTGCCGCAAT | ||
|
| ||
| Heat stable toxin 1 (ST1) | F: CTTTCCCCTCTTTTTAGTCAG | 175 |
| R: TAACATGGAGCACAGGCAGG | ||
|
| ||
| Shiga like toxin 1 (stx1) | F: CTGCCGGACACATAGAAGGAAACT | 267 |
| R: AGAGGGGATTTCGTACAACACTGG | ||
|
| ||
| Shiga like toxin 2 (stx2) | F: GGAGTTCAGTGGTAATACAATG | 149 |
| R: GCGTCATCGTATACACAGG | ||
|
| ||
| Intimin (eae A) | F: GAAGCCAAAGCGCACAAGACT | 413 |
| R: CTCCGCGGTTTTAGCAGACAC | ||
Distribution of noncoliforms, coliforms, and E. coli among the three districts.
| District | Total number of samples | Total isolates | Noncoliforms | Total coliforms |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (%) | Number (%) | Number (%) | Number (%) | ||
| First district | 90 | 30 (33.3) | 10 (11.1) | 20 (22.2) | 9 (10.0) |
| Second district | 120 | 38 (31.66) | 22 (18.3) | 16 (13.3) | 7 (5.83) |
| Third district | 90 | 6 (6.66) | 6 (6.66) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| |||||
| Total | 300 | 74 (24.66) | 38 (12.66) | 36 (12.0) | 16 (5.33) |
Distribution of positive coliform and E. coli isolates among seasons of the year.
| Seasons | Spring | Other seasons | Test of significance |
| Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number/percentage of coliform positive samples | 26 (17.1%) | 10 (6.75%) |
|
| S. |
| Number/percentage of | 14 (9.2%) | 2 (1.35%) |
|
| S. |
Figure 3The positive E. coli isolates in relation to water sources in different regions of Zagazig.
Figure 4The positive E. coli isolates in relation to Zagazig water network with its different materials of construction.
Virulence genes among E. coli isolates in both districts.
| Gene | Total ( | First district ( | Second district ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | % | Positive | % | Positive | % | |
| LT gene | 4 | 26.27 | 2 | 25.0 | 2 | 28.57 |
| ST gene | 2 | 13.13 | 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 28.57 |
| stx1 gene | 3 | 20.0 | 2 | 25.0 | 1 | 14.28 |
| stx2 gene | 1 | 6.66 | 1 | 12.5 | 0 | 0 |
| eae gene | 5 | 33.33 | 3 | 37.5 | 2 | 28.57 |