Vani Nath Simmons1, Gwendolyn P Quinn2, Paul T Harrell3, Lauren R Meltzer3, John B Correa4, Marina Unrod4, Thomas H Brandon1. 1. Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. 2. Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Community and Family Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. 3. Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA. 4. Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There has been an exponential increase in the prevalence of e-cigarette use, particularly among youth. However, adult use is also rising, and there have been relatively few qualitative studies with adult users to understand their reasons for use and future use intentions. Such information is needed to inform both prevention and cessation approaches. METHOD: Thirty-one e-cigarette users participated in one of several focus groups assessing the appeal of e-cigarettes as well as comparisons to combustible cigarettes and approved smoking cessation aids. We also obtained perspectives on future use intentions and interest in e-cigarette cessation interventions. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Participants reported several aspects of e-cigarette appeal as compared to approved cessation treatment options. These included similarities to combustible cigarettes, fewer side effects, and control of e-cigarettes to suit personal preferences. Participants were split on whether they preferred flavors that mimicked or contrasted with their combustible cigarettes (i.e., tobacco vs. alternative flavors, such as candy). Some participants who were unmotivated to quit smoking reported an unanticipated disinterest in continuing use of combustible cigarettes shortly after initiating e-cigarettes. Despite strong interest in reducing nicotine dosage, the majority did not intend to fully discontinue e-cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding e-cigarette users' perspectives can inform policy and treatment development. Regulatory and policy initiatives will need to balance the appealing characteristics of e-cigarettes with the potential for negative public health outcomes.
BACKGROUND: There has been an exponential increase in the prevalence of e-cigarette use, particularly among youth. However, adult use is also rising, and there have been relatively few qualitative studies with adult users to understand their reasons for use and future use intentions. Such information is needed to inform both prevention and cessation approaches. METHOD: Thirty-one e-cigarette users participated in one of several focus groups assessing the appeal of e-cigarettes as well as comparisons to combustible cigarettes and approved smoking cessation aids. We also obtained perspectives on future use intentions and interest in e-cigarette cessation interventions. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using the constant comparative method. RESULTS:Participants reported several aspects of e-cigarette appeal as compared to approved cessation treatment options. These included similarities to combustible cigarettes, fewer side effects, and control of e-cigarettes to suit personal preferences. Participants were split on whether they preferred flavors that mimicked or contrasted with their combustible cigarettes (i.e., tobacco vs. alternative flavors, such as candy). Some participants who were unmotivated to quit smoking reported an unanticipated disinterest in continuing use of combustible cigarettes shortly after initiating e-cigarettes. Despite strong interest in reducing nicotine dosage, the majority did not intend to fully discontinue e-cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding e-cigarette users' perspectives can inform policy and treatment development. Regulatory and policy initiatives will need to balance the appealing characteristics of e-cigarettes with the potential for negative public health outcomes.
Authors: Konstantinos E Farsalinos; Giorgio Romagna; Dimitris Tsiapras; Stamatis Kyrzopoulos; Vassilis Voudris Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-04-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Pongkwan Yimsaard; Ann McNeill; Hua-Hie Yong; K Michael Cummings; Janet Chung-Hall; Summer Sherburne Hawkins; Ann C K Quah; Geoffrey T Fong; Richard J O'Connor; Sara C Hitchman Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Tracy T Smith; Bryan W Heckman; Amy E Wahlquist; K Michael Cummings; Matthew J Carpenter Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: John B Correa; Karen O Brandon; Lauren R Meltzer; Hannah J Hoehn; Bárbara Piñeiro; Thomas H Brandon; Vani N Simmons Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Dana A Cavallo; Grace Kong; Daniel M Ells; Deepa R Camenga; Meghan E Morean; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2019-04-01
Authors: Lauren R Pacek; Olga Rass; Maggie M Sweitzer; Jason A Oliver; F Joseph McClernon Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Robyn L Landry; Allison L Groom; Thanh-Huyen T Vu; Andrew C Stokes; Kaitlyn M Berry; Anshula Kesh; Joy L Hart; Kandi L Walker; Aida L Giachello; Clara G Sears; Kathleen L McGlasson; Lindsay K Tompkins; Delvon T Mattingly; Rose Marie Robertson; Thomas J Payne Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Amanda M Palmer; Sarah N Price; Madeline G Foster; Brandon T Sanford; Lisa M Fucito; Benjamin A Toll Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2022-09-01
Authors: Úrsula Martínez; Víctor Martínez-Loredo; Vani N Simmons; Lauren R Meltzer; David J Drobes; Karen O Brandon; Amanda M Palmer; Thomas Eissenberg; Christopher R Bullen; Paul T Harrell; Thomas H Brandon Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 4.244