| Literature DB >> 27725780 |
Parthiban Ramasamy1, Attila Szabo2,3, Stefan Borzel2, Jürgen Eckert1,4, Mihai Stoica1,5, András Bárdos2.
Abstract
Soft ferromagnetic Fe-based bulk metallic glass key-shaped specimens with a maximum and minimum width of 25.4 and 5 mm, respectively, were successfully produced using a high pressure die casting (HPDC) method, The influence of die material, alloy temperature and flow rate on the microstructure, thermal stability and soft ferromagnetic properties has been studied. The results suggest that a steel die in which the molten metal flows at low rate and high temperature can be used to produce completely glassy samples. This can be attributed to the laminar filling of the mold and to a lower heat transfer coefficient, which avoids the skin effect in the steel mold. In addition, magnetic measurements reveal that the amorphous structure of the material is maintained throughout the key-shaped samples. Although it is difficult to control the flow and cooling rate of the molten metal in the corners of the key due to different cross sections, this can be overcome by proper tool geometry. The present results confirm that HPDC is a suitable method for the casting of Fe-based bulk glassy alloys even with complex geometries for a broad range of applications.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27725780 PMCID: PMC5057086 DOI: 10.1038/srep35258
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Comparision between HPDC, TPF and SLM processes.
| HPDC process | SLM method process | TPF method process |
|---|---|---|
| Single step process | Multiple step process (samples are built layer by layer in several steps) | Multiple step process (Two or more stages are involved in the processes) |
| Casting process completes fast (high production rate) | Processing time mainly depending on the shape and size of the final product | Final shape decides the processing time (since the processing time is limited, it may take several heating cycles to complete the product |
| Widely studied and casting parameters well established (standard casting parameters are readily available for several alloy systems) | Standard parameters are available for few basic alloy systems only (standards are still in development stage | Only few alloys were processed by this method (needs development of more novel techniques to establishing standards) |
| Marginal glass formers can also be produced by this method (Due to application of high pressure good contact is established between the mold and the molten metal, which increases the cooling rate) | Only good glass formers with high thermal stability can be prepared by this method (during the addition of every new consecutive layer previous layer temperatures are subjected to increase in temperature, which leads to crystallization) | Only very good glass formers with high SLR can be processed (Good glass formers often contains toxic (Be |
| Preparation of starting material is easy (normally induction melting or arc melting is preferred) | Difficult to get homogeneous multicomponent amorphous powder (SLM uses powder and the quality of the product depends on the quality of the powder | Glassy plate, rod or granules serves as starting material (quality of the glassy sample decides the final product quality) |
| Casting defects such as gas pockets and shrink holes can be drastically reduced or controlled | Very difficult to avoid micro-pores and micro cracks (initial powder particle size and scanning speed plays important role in controlling the micro-pores and micro-cracks | During the process micro-pores and micro-cracks will be closed |
| Casting environment can influence the crystallization kinetics (casting die temperature, casting speed and casting atmosphere affect the final product) | Needs high purity inert atmosphere to produce the samples (The fine powders will oxidize or explode if the working atmosphere has oxygen) | TPF can be done in open atmosphere |
| Samples have huge internal stress (the fast cooling results in large internal stress) | By pre-heating the base plate the internal stress can be reduced | Internal stress can be relieved by slow cooling of the sample after final processing step |
| Limited reusability of the material (repeated usage leads to absorption of more oxygen, which influences the heterogeneous nucleation sites) | Powders can be reused after an additional sieving (The whole process is carried under inert atmosphere) | samples can be used after re -melting |
| Thin sections and sections with interconnected holes cannot be produced (viscosity of the molten alloy determines the minimum section thickness) | Any complex shape can be produced, powder size and the layer thickness are the only limiting factor, the technique has virtual no limitation | Thin and micro sections can be produced easily and easier than thick sections |
Figure 1(a) Schematic illustration of the high pressure die casting setup; (b). 3D model of the die; (c). Completed dies made from heat resistant steel and a copper alloy.
Figure 2DSC curves (heating rate 20 K/min) of the glassy specimens cast at different temperatures using (a) copper die and (b) steel die.
Figure 3(a) Cast part (key) still in the mold cavity (b) Cast part (key) separated from the mold.
Enthalpies of the first and second crystallization step for the key samples cast at different temperatures using copper and steel dies.
| Sample cast conditions | First Crystallization enthalpy (J/g) ±0.2 | Second Crystallization enthalpy (J/g) ±0.2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Die material | Flow rate (m/s) | Casting Temperature (K) ±10 | ||
| Copper | 4 | 1353 | −3.2 | −10.4 |
| Copper | 4 | 1393 | −9.8 | −28.7 |
| Copper | 4 | 1453 | −11.8 | −30.1 |
| Copper | 4 | 1573 | −13.4 | −32.8 |
| Steel | 4 | 1353 | −3.8 | −10.2 |
| Steel | 4 | 1393 | −10.7 | −27.5 |
| Steel | 4 | 1453 | −12.4 | −32.8 |
| Steel | 4 | 1573 | −15.6 | −38.8 |
| Steel | 12 | 1573 | −13.1 | −31.9 |
| Steel | 19 | 1573 | −9.8 | −26.7 |
| Rod cast in lab - Copper die | — | 1523 | −15.8 | −39.1 |
Enthalpies of the 3 mm rod cast in lab condition is given for reference purpose.
Figure 4XRD patterns of the glasses cast at different temperatures using (a) copper die and (b) steel die.
Comparison between literature data (4 mm)42 and our data for the Fe74Mo4P10C7.5B2.5Si2 glassy samples (3 mm rod and key sample).
| Fe74Mo4P10C7.5B2.5Si2 | D (mm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Literature | 4 | 729 | 766 | 37 | 1266 | 0.58 |
| Key sample | — | 725 | 760 | 35 | 1283 | 0.57 |
| Sample cast in lab using cu mold | 3 | 730 | 765 | 35 | 1283 | 0.57 |
T is the glass transition temperature, Tx is the onset of crystallization, ΔT the extension of the supercooled liquid region (SLR), measured as the difference between crystallization and glass transition temperatures, T is the liquidus temperature, T the reduced glass transition temperature, measured as the ratio between the glass transition and liquidus temperatures.
Figure 5Flow3D simulation for three different flow rates: (a) 4 m/s, (b) 12 m/s and (c) 19 m/s.
Figure 6SEM images of the key cast at 1353 K (a) taken at the core of the key, showing a completely crystalline region; (b) taken in between the core and the outer surface, revealing the interface between the glassy and crystalline parts and (c) taken close to the outer surface, showing a completely glassy part of the key.
Coercivity of the keys as a function of casting speed (m/s), alloy temperature (K) and die material.
| Die Material | Flow rate (m/s) ±0.5 | Alloy Temperature (K) ± 10 | Coercivity Hc (A/m) ±0.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steel | 4 | 1573 | 7.8 |
| Steel | 4 | 1443 | 210 |
| Steel | 4 | 1393 | >2000 |
| Steel | 4 | 1353 | >2000 |
| Steel | 12 | 1573 | 9.8 |
| Steel | 19 | 1573 | 80 |
| Copper | 4 | 1573 | 57.9 |
| Copper | 4 | 1443 | 59.2 |
| Copper | 4 | 1393 | >2000 |
| Copper | 4 | 1353 | >2000 |
| Rod cast in lab - Copper die | — | 1523 | 5 |
Coercivity of the 3 mm rod cast in lab condition is given for reference purpose.
Figure 7Hysteresis loops for a 2 mm rod cast under laboratory conditions and the key cast by HPDC.