| Literature DB >> 27725378 |
Yumiko Maekawa1, Juan Ramos-Cejudo, Atsuko Kanai.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Although using mental health services is an effective way to cope with work-related stressors and diseases, many employees do not utilize these services despite service improvements in recent years. The present study aimed to investigate the interaction effects of workplace climate and distress on help-seeking attitudes, and elucidate the reasons for mental health service underutilization in Japan.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27725378 PMCID: PMC5373913 DOI: 10.1539/joh.16-0052-OA
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Occup Health ISSN: 1341-9145 Impact factor: 2.708
Correlation between the variables
|
|
| Help–seeking attitude | WMHC | Distress | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OST | VNST | Evaluation | Risk | ||||
| * | |||||||
| OST | 2.93 | (0.951) | – | 0.396*** | 0.086* | –0.037 | 0.152*** |
| VNST | 3.47 | (0.903) | – | –0.085* | 0.105** | 0.030 | |
| Evaluation of Services | 2.89 | (1.061) | – | –0.427*** | –0.225*** | ||
| Risk for Career Disadvantage | 2.92 | (0.773) | – | 0.273*** | |||
| Distress | 2.06 | (0.653) | – | ||||
Fig. 1.Two-way interaction of "Evaluation of services" × "distress" on "OST"
Fig. 2.Two-way interaction of "Risk for career disadvantage" × "distress" on "OST"
Multiple regression analysis on OST
| Step1 | Step2 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictor | β | 95% confidence interval | collinearity statistics | β | 95% confidence interval | collinearity statistics | ||||||
| Lower | Upper | Tol. | VIF | Lower | Upper | Tol. | VIF | |||||
| Tol. =Tolerance | ||||||||||||
| Age | 0.010 | * | 0.001 | 0.019 | 0.753 | 1.32 | 0.011 | ** | 0.002 | 0.019 | 0.745 | 1.34 |
| Title | 0.013 | –0.034 | 0.060 | 0.763 | 1.31 | 0.014 | –0.033 | 0.061 | 0.762 | 1.31 | ||
| Company size | 0.038 | –0.020 | 0.096 | 0.689 | 1.45 | 0.031 | –0.027 | 0.089 | 0.681 | 1.47 | ||
| Evaluation of Services | 0.058 | –0.036 | 0.152 | 0.582 | 1.72 | 0.052 | –0.043 | 0.147 | 0.563 | 1.78 | ||
| Risk for Career Disadvatage | –0.044 | –0.127 | 0.040 | 0.731 | 1.37 | –0.075 | –0.163 | 0.013 | 0.650 | 1.54 | ||
| Distress | 0.177 | *** | 0.102 | 0.252 | 0.909 | 1.10 | 0.149 | 0.068 | 0.230 | 0.772 | 1.30 | |
| Evaluation×Risk | –0.052 | –0.125 | 0.021 | 0.737 | 1.36 | |||||||
| Evaluation×Distress | –0.116 | ** | –0.201 | –0.032 | 0.720 | 1.39 | ||||||
| Risk×Distress | –0.088 | * | –0.173 | –0.004 | 0.641 | 1.56 | ||||||
| Evaluation×Risk×Distress | –0.052 | –0.126 | 0.021 | 0.566 | 1.77 | |||||||
| ΔR2 | 0.049*** | 0.011* | ||||||||||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.049*** | 0.060*** | ||||||||||
Fig. 3.Three-way interaction of "Evaluation of services" × "Risk for career disadvantage" × "distress" on "NVST"
Multiple regression analysis on NVST
| Step1 | Step2 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictor | β | 95% confidence interval | collinearity statistics | β | 95% confidence interval | collinearity statistics | ||||||
| Lower | Upper | Tol. | VIF | Lower | Upper | Tol. | VIF | |||||
| Tol. =Tolerance | ||||||||||||
| Age | –0.013 | ** | –0.021 | –0.005 | 0.753 | 1.33 | –0.013 | ** | –0.021 | –0.005 | 0.745 | 1.34 |
| Title | –0.017 | –0.062 | 0.028 | 0.763 | 1.31 | –0.015 | –0.060 | 0.029 | 0.762 | 1.31 | ||
| Company size | –0.049 | –0.105 | 0.006 | 0.689 | 1.45 | –0.055 | –0.110 | 0.000 | 0.681 | 1.47 | ||
| Evaluation of Services | 0.017 | –0.072 | 0.107 | 0.582 | 1.71 | 0.000 | –0.091 | 0.090 | 0.563 | 1.78 | ||
| Risk for Career Disadvatage | 0.084 | 0.005 | 0.164 | 0.731 | 1.37 | 0.137 | ** | 0.053 | 0.221 | 0.650 | 1.54 | |
| Distress | –0.001 | –0.072 | 0.071 | 0.909 | 1.10 | 0.029 | –0.048 | 0.106 | 0.772 | 1.30 | ||
| Evaluation×Risk | 0.124 | *** | 0.055 | 0.194 | 0.737 | 1.36 | ||||||
| Evaluation×Distress | –0.069 | –0.150 | 0.011 | 0.720 | 1.39 | |||||||
| Risk×Distress | 0.047 | –0.034 | 0.127 | 0.641 | 1.56 | |||||||
| Evaluation×Risk×Distress | 0.113 | ** | 0.043 | 0.182 | 0.566 | 1.77 | ||||||
| ΔR2 | 0.037*** | 0.019** | ||||||||||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.037*** | 0.056*** | ||||||||||