| Literature DB >> 27725351 |
Seong-Hoon Seok1, Dong-Hyuk Jeong, Il-Hwa Hong, Hee-Chun Lee, Seong-Chan Yeon.
Abstract
Anesthesia is an inevitably important component of diagnosis and treatments examining the health condition of wild animals. Not only does anesthesia become an essential tool in minimizing stress of the patients and providing an opportunity to deliver accurate and safe procedures, but it also ensures the safety of the medical crew members. This study was conducted to investigate the dose-response cardiorespiratory effects of isoflurane during spontaneous ventilation in ten cinereous vultures. Each bird was administered isoflurane at initial concentration of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 and then an end-tidal isoflurane concentrations (ETiso) of 1.0% for an equilibration period of 15 min in the given order. At the end of the equilibration period, the direct blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and end tidal CO2 partial pressure (PETCO2) were recorded, and blood gas analysis was performed. Increasing isoflurane concentrations during spontaneous ventilation led to dose-dependent increases in HR and PETCO2, with minimal changes in RR, decreased arterial BP and respiratory acidosis. Overall, isoflurane for anesthesia of spontaneously breathing cinereous vultures is a suitable choice for diagnostic or surgical procedures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27725351 PMCID: PMC5289254 DOI: 10.1292/jvms.16-0314
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Med Sci ISSN: 0916-7250 Impact factor: 1.267
Dose-response effects on temperature, cardiovascular and respiratory parameters following isoflurane anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation in cinereous vultures (Aegypius monachus)
| Variables | 1.0% ETiso (first) | 1.5% ETiso | 2.0% ETiso | 2.5% ETiso | 3.0% ETiso | 1.0% ETiso (second) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n=10) | (n=10) | (n=10) | (n=10) | (n=7) | (n=10) | |
| HR (beats/min) | 99 ± 23 | 124 ± 35 | 170 ± 54b) | 198 ± 60b,d) | 199 ± 49b,e) | 100 ± 22 |
| RR (breaths/min) | 17 ± 12 | 13 ± 10 | 12 ±4 | 13 ± 5 | 14 ± 5 | 11 ± 5 |
| SAP (mmHg) | 157 ± 22 | 154 ± 21 | 148 ± 18 | 138 ± 15 | 127 ± 7c) | 156 ± 15 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 130 ± 18 | 124 ± 21 | 117 ± 20 | 106 ± 15 | 97 ± 8c) | 122 ± 13 |
| DAP (mmHg) | 109 ± 20 | 103 ± 24 | 96 ± 25 | 84 ± 19 | 71 ± 10c) | 92 ± 15 |
| PETCO2 (mmHg) | 41 ± 8 | 46 ± 8 | 54 ± 7b) | 58 ± 9b,e) | 62 ± 11b,d) | 48 ± 5 |
| BT (°C ) | 39.8 ± 0.6 | 39.7 ± 0.5 | 39.7 ± 0.5 | 39.7 ± 0.4 | 39.8 ± 0.4 | 39.7 ± 0.4 |
a) Values are presented as the mean ± SD. Abbreviations: HR, heart rate; RR, respiratory rate; SAP, systolic arterial blood pressure; MAP, mean arterial blood pressure; DAP, diastolic arterial blood pressure; PETCO2, end tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure; BT, body temperature. b) P<0.01, Significant difference compared with the values at the first application of 1.0% ETiso. c) P<0.05, Significant difference compared with the values at the first application of 1.0% ETiso. d) P<0.01, Significant difference compared with the values of 1.5% ETiso. e) P<0.05, Significant difference compared with the values of 1.5% ETiso.
Dose-response effects on arterial blood gas and acid-base balance following isoflurane anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation in cinereous vultures (Aegypius monachus)
| Variables | 1.0% ETiso (first) | 1.5% ETiso | 2.0% ETiso | 2.5% ETiso | 3.0% ETiso | 1.0% ETiso (second) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n=10) | (n=10) | (n=10) | (n=10) | (n=7) | (n=10) | |
| pH | 7.50 ± 0.05 | 7.46 ± 0.05 | 7.41 ± 0.06b) | 7.33 ± 0.06b,d) | 7.24 ± 0.06b,d,f) | 7.48 ± 0.05 |
| PaO2 (mmHg) | 518 ± 31 | 522 ± 26 | 512 ± 20 | 502 ± 18 | 457 ± 88c,e) | 527 ± 19 |
| PaCO2 (mmHg) | 38 ± 7 | 41 ± 6 | 48 ± 9 | 60 ± 12b,e) | 76 ± 15b,d,f,g) | 39 ± 6 |
| HCO3– (mmol/ | 26.8 ± 3.6 | 26.9 ± 2.7 | 27.8 ± 2.7 | 28.8 ± 2.9 | 29.8 ± 3.4 | 26.0 ± 2.7 |
| BE (mmol/ | 4.3 ± 2.9 | 3.5 ± 2.2 | 2.7 ± 1.7 | 1.5 ± 1.9 | 0.1 ± 2.8c) | 3.1 ± 2.3 |
a) Values are presented as the mean ± SD. Abbreviations: PaO2, partial pressure of arterial oxygen; PaCO2, partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide; HCO3−, calculated bicarbonate concentration; BE, calculated base excess. b) P<0.01, Significant difference compared with the values at the first application of 1.0% ETiso. c) P<0.05, Significant difference compared with the values at the first application of 1.0% ETiso. d) P<0.01, Significant difference compared with the values of 1.5% ETiso. e) P<0.05, Significant difference compared with the values of 1.5% ETiso. f) P<0.01, Significant difference compared with the values of 2.0% ETiso. g) P<0.05, Significant difference compared with the values of 2.5% ETiso.