Ulrika Bejerholm1, Maria E Larsson2, Suzanne Johanson3. 1. Department of Health Sciences/Work and Mental Health, Medical Faculty, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Electronic address: ulrika.bejerholm@med.lu.se. 2. Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden. 3. Department of Health Sciences/Work and Mental Health, Medical Faculty, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While effective vocational methods for gaining employment exist for people with schizophrenia and similar conditions, no evidence exists with regard to people with affective disorders. We aimed to study the effectiveness of a newly developed Individual Enabling and Support (IES) model adapted for the target group and compared to traditional vocational rehabilitation (TVR). METHODS: An assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a parallel design was performed. Sixty-one participants received IES or TVR. The primary outcome was employment rate at 12-month follow-up. Secondary vocational outcomes, depression severity, and quality of life were also studied. Trial register number is ISRCTN93470551. RESULTS:IES was more effective for employment compared to TVR (42.4% vs. 4%; difference 38%, 95% CI 0.12-0.55). Significant group differences were present in secondary vocational outcomes (hours and weeks employed, time to employment), and depression severity. The IES-group had significantly lowering in depression scores and increased quality of life scores during the intervention period. LIMITATIONS: This RCT was limited by the small sample size due to restriction of recruitment to middle-sized cities within geographically diverse sites in southern Sweden. Larger trials are needed, also in primary health care and employment services settings. CONCLUSIONS:IES is more effective than TVR for attaining employment and improving depressive symptoms. On a societal level, IES closes the time and service gap between treatment and employment, and thus lowers sick-leave costs.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: While effective vocational methods for gaining employment exist for people with schizophrenia and similar conditions, no evidence exists with regard to people with affective disorders. We aimed to study the effectiveness of a newly developed Individual Enabling and Support (IES) model adapted for the target group and compared to traditional vocational rehabilitation (TVR). METHODS: An assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a parallel design was performed. Sixty-one participants received IES or TVR. The primary outcome was employment rate at 12-month follow-up. Secondary vocational outcomes, depression severity, and quality of life were also studied. Trial register number is ISRCTN93470551. RESULTS:IES was more effective for employment compared to TVR (42.4% vs. 4%; difference 38%, 95% CI 0.12-0.55). Significant group differences were present in secondary vocational outcomes (hours and weeks employed, time to employment), and depression severity. The IES-group had significantly lowering in depression scores and increased quality of life scores during the intervention period. LIMITATIONS: This RCT was limited by the small sample size due to restriction of recruitment to middle-sized cities within geographically diverse sites in southern Sweden. Larger trials are needed, also in primary health care and employment services settings. CONCLUSIONS:IES is more effective than TVR for attaining employment and improving depressive symptoms. On a societal level, IES closes the time and service gap between treatment and employment, and thus lowers sick-leave costs.
Authors: Lone Hellström; Pernille Pedersen; Thomas Nordahl Christensen; Iben Gammelgaard Wallstroem; Anders Bo Bojesen; Elsebeth Stenager; Ulrika Bejerholm; Jooske van Busschbach; Harry Michon; Kim T Mueser; Silje Endresen Reme; Sarah White; Lene Falgaard Eplov Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2021-03-04
Authors: Lars de Winter; Chrisje Couwenbergh; Jaap van Weeghel; Sarita Sanches; Harry Michon; Gary R Bond Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 7.818
Authors: Yvonne B Suijkerbuijk; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Joost C van Mechelen; Anneli Ojajärvi; Marc Corbière; Johannes R Anema Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-09-12
Authors: Veerle Brenninkmeijer; Suzanne E Lagerveld; Roland W B Blonk; Wilmar B Schaufeli; Leoniek D N V Wijngaards-de Meij Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2019-03