Literature DB >> 27723280

Association Between Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover and Bone Changes on Imaging: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Leticia A Deveza1, Virginia B Kraus2, Jamie E Collins3, Ali Guermazi4, Frank W Roemer5, Michael Bowes6, Michael C Nevitt7, Christoph Ladel8, David J Hunter1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between biochemical markers involved in bone turnover and bone features on imaging in knees with osteoarthritis (OA).
METHODS: We analyzed data from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health OA Biomarkers Consortium within the Osteoarthritis Initiative (n = 600). Bone marrow lesions (BMLs), osteophytes, and subchondral bone area (mm2 ) and shape (position on 3-D vector) were assessed on magnetic resonance images, and bone trabecular integrity (BTI) was assessed on radiographs. Serum and urinary markers (serum C-terminal crosslinked telopeptide of type I collagen [CTX-I], serum crosslinked N-telopeptide of type I collagen [NTX-I], urinary NTX-I, urinary C-terminal crosslinked telopeptide of type II collagen [CTX-II], and urinary CTX-Iα and CTX-Iβ) were measured. The associations between biochemical and imaging markers at baseline and over 24 months were assessed using regression models adjusted for covariates.
RESULTS: At baseline, most biochemical markers were associated with BMLs, with C statistics for the presence/absence of any BML ranging from 0.675 to 0.688. At baseline, urinary CTX-II was the marker most consistently associated with BMLs (with odds of having ≥5 subregions affected compared to no BML increasing by 1.92-fold [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.25, 2.96] per 1 SD of urinary CTX-II), large osteophytes (odds ratio 1.39 [95% CI 1.10, 1.77]), bone area and shape (highest partial R2  = 0.032), and changes in bone shape over 24 months (partial R2 range 0.008 to 0.024). Overall, biochemical markers were not predictive of changes in BMLs or osteophytes. Serum NTX-I was inversely associated with BTI of the vertical trabeculae (quadratic slope) in all analyses (highest partial R2  = 0.028).
CONCLUSION: We found multiple significant associations, albeit mostly weak ones. The role of systemic biochemical markers as predictors of individual bone anatomic features of single knees is limited based on our findings.
© 2016, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27723280      PMCID: PMC5385286          DOI: 10.1002/acr.23121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  30 in total

1.  Unsupervised segmentation and quantification of anatomical knee features: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  José G Tamez-Peña; Joshua Farber; Patricia C González; Edward Schreyer; Erika Schneider; Saara Totterman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based three-dimensional bone shape of the knee predicts onset of knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Tuhina Neogi; Michael A Bowes; Jingbo Niu; Kevin M De Souza; Graham R Vincent; Joyce Goggins; Yuqing Zhang; David T Felson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2013-08

Review 3.  Subchondral bone and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Thomas Funck-Brentano; Martine Cohen-Solal
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Longitudinal validation of periarticular bone area and 3D shape as biomarkers for knee OA progression? Data from the FNIH OA Biomarkers Consortium.

Authors:  David Hunter; Michael Nevitt; John Lynch; Virginia Byers Kraus; Jeffrey N Katz; Jamie E Collins; Mike Bowes; Ali Guermazi; Frank W Roemer; Elena Losina
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  The effect of type II collagen on MSC osteogenic differentiation and bone defect repair.

Authors:  Li-Hsuan Chiu; Wen-Fu T Lai; Shwu-Fen Chang; Chin-Chean Wong; Cheng-Yu Fan; Chia-Lang Fang; Yu-Hui Tsai
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Increase in bone marrow lesions associated with cartilage loss: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  David J Hunter; Yuqing Zhang; Jingbo Niu; Joyce Goggins; Shreyasee Amin; Michael P LaValley; Ali Guermazi; Harry Genant; Daniel Gale; David T Felson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-05

7.  Disease-modifying effect of strontium ranelate in a subset of patients from the Phase III knee osteoarthritis study SEKOIA using quantitative MRI: reduction in bone marrow lesions protects against cartilage loss.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Camille Roubille; Jean-Pierre Raynauld; François Abram; Marc Dorais; Philippe Delorme; Johanne Martel-Pelletier
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage loss in a subsample from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort.

Authors:  W Wirth; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; B T Wyman; S Maschek; M Hudelmaier; W Hitzl; M Nevitt; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Establishment of reference intervals for osteoarthritis-related soluble biomarkers: the FNIH/OARSI OA Biomarkers Consortium.

Authors:  Virginia B Kraus; David E Hargrove; David J Hunter; Jordan B Renner; Joanne M Jordan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 10.  A systematic review of the relationship between subchondral bone features, pain and structural pathology in peripheral joint osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Andrew J Barr; T Mark Campbell; Devan Hopkinson; Sarah R Kingsbury; Mike A Bowes; Philip G Conaghan
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  6 in total

1.  Multivariable Modeling of Biomarker Data From the Phase I Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Osteoarthritis Biomarkers Consortium.

Authors:  David J Hunter; Leticia A Deveza; Jamie E Collins; Elena Losina; Jeffrey N Katz; Michael C Nevitt; John A Lynch; Frank W Roemer; Ali Guermazi; Michael A Bowes; Erik B Dam; Felix Eckstein; C Kent Kwoh; Steve Hoffmann; Virginia B Kraus
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 5.178

2.  The relationship between two different measures of osteoarthritis bone pathology, bone marrow lesions and 3D bone shape: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  B Dube; M A Bowes; E M A Hensor; A Barr; S R Kingsbury; P G Conaghan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  Symptomatic bone marrow lesions induced by reduced bone mineral density in middle-aged women: a cross-sectional Japanese population study.

Authors:  Seiya Ota; Daisuke Chiba; Eiji Sasaki; Gentaro Kumagai; Yuji Yamamoto; Shigeyuki Nakaji; Eiichi Tsuda; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 5.156

4.  Associations between biomarkers of bone and cartilage turnover, gender, pain categories and radiographic severity in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Asger Reinstrup Bihlet; Inger Byrjalsen; Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen; Jeppe Ragnar Andersen; Claus Christiansen; Bente Juel Riis; Morten A Karsdal
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 5.156

5.  The combination of an inflammatory peripheral blood gene expression and imaging biomarkers enhance prediction of radiographic progression in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Mukundan Attur; Svetlana Krasnokutsky; Hua Zhou; Jonathan Samuels; Gregory Chang; Jenny Bencardino; Pamela Rosenthal; Leon Rybak; Janet L Huebner; Virginia B Kraus; Steven B Abramson
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 5.156

6.  Clinically Relevant Molecular Biomarkers for Use in Human Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  James G Convill; Gwenllian F Tawy; Anthony J Freemont; Leela C Biant
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.634

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.