Literature DB >> 27722355

Impacts of coal ash on methylmercury production and the methylating microbial community in anaerobic sediment slurries.

Grace E Schwartz1, Lauren K Redfern1, Kaoru Ikuma2, Claudia K Gunsch1, Laura S Ruhl3, Avner Vengosh4, Heileen Hsu-Kim1.   

Abstract

Mercury (Hg) associated with coal ash is an environmental concern, particularly if the release of coal ash to the environment is associated with the conversion of inorganic Hg to methylmercury (MeHg), a bioaccumulative form of Hg that is produced by anaerobic microorganisms. In this study, sediment slurry microcosm experiments were performed to understand how spilled coal ash might influence MeHg production in anaerobic sediments of an aquatic ecosystem. Two coal ash types were used: (1) a weathered coal ash; and (2) a freshly collected, unweathered fly ash that was relatively enriched in sulfate and Hg compared to the weathered ash. These ash samples were added to anaerobic sediment slurries constructed with a relatively pristine sediment (containing 0.03 mg kg-1 Hg) and a Hg-contaminated sediment (containing 0.29 mg kg-1 Hg). The results of these experiments showed negligible net production of MeHg in microcosms with no ash and in microcosms amended with the low sulfate/low Hg ash. In contrast, slurry microcosms amended with high sulfate/high Hg ash showed increases in total MeHg content that was 2 to 3 times greater than control microcosms without ash (p < 0.001). 16S amplicon sequencing of microbial communities in the slurries indicated that the coal ash addition generally increased the relative abundance of the methylating microbial community, including sulfate-reducing bacteria and iron-reducing bacteria species that are known to be efficient methylators of Hg. The stimulation of these microorganisms was likely caused by the release of substrates (sulfate and Fe) originating from the ash. Overall, the results highlight the need to incorporate both environmental parameters and coal ash characteristics into risk assessments that guide coal ash management and disposal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27722355     DOI: 10.1039/c6em00458j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts        ISSN: 2050-7887            Impact factor:   4.238


  3 in total

1.  Non-invasive biomonitoring of mercury in birds near thermal power plants: lessons from Maharashtra, India.

Authors:  Sunidhi Thakur; Shalini Dhyani; Kavita Bramhanwade; Krishna Kumar Pandey; Naresh Bokade; Ramesh Janipella; Paras Pujari
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Ranking Coal Ash Materials for Their Potential to Leach Arsenic and Selenium: Relative Importance of Ash Chemistry and Site Biogeochemistry.

Authors:  Grace E Schwartz; James C Hower; Allison L Phillips; Nelson Rivera; Avner Vengosh; Heileen Hsu-Kim
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 1.907

3.  Oligotrophic wetland sediments susceptible to shifts in microbiomes and mercury cycling with dissolved organic matter addition.

Authors:  Emily B Graham; Rachel S Gabor; Shon Schooler; Diane M McKnight; Diana R Nemergut; Joseph E Knelman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.