Literature DB >> 27721766

Pediatric Oral/Maxillofacial Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Clinicopathologic Report of Four Cases.

Joel C Thompson1, Gary M Woods2, Michael A Arnold3, Charles Elmaraghy4, Samir B Kahwash3, Timothy P Cripe5, Bhuvana A Setty6.   

Abstract

Pediatric soft tissue sarcomas of the oral/maxillofacial region are rare neoplasms that present significant difficulty with respect to treatment and local control measures. We report four cases of pediatric oral/maxillofacial soft tissue sarcomas from our tertiary care pediatric hospital and emphasize the rarity of these malignancies and the challenges encountered in treating these lesions, and suggest areas for further research. We conclude that multimodal therapy and interdisciplinary cooperation are paramount to successful management of these lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Oral/maxillofacial region; Soft tissue sarcoma

Year:  2016        PMID: 27721766      PMCID: PMC5043172          DOI: 10.1159/000447689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Oncol        ISSN: 1662-6575


Introduction

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies that are generally identified as arising from mesenchyme-derived tissue [1]. Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) account for only about 12% of all pediatric head and neck cancers, with a small minority in the oral/maxillofacial (OMF) region [2]. These tumors present significant challenges for local control due to the proximity and radiosensitivity of regional anatomic structures [2]. These challenges highlight the importance of coordination between various medical subspecialists in planning and executing treatment and local disease control measures. With a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach to management and local control, preservation of function has become a realistic goal of therapy [3]. Our search revealed no published case series that offer a synthesized view of their diagnosis, pathology, treatment, and outcomes. We report four pediatric cases of STS involving the OMF region, highlighting difficulties inherent in managing these lesions, the needs for multimodal therapy and improved risk stratification strategies.

Methods

The tumor registry at Nationwide Children's Hospital was screened for cases of STS occurring in the OMF region from 2000 to 2015 in accordance with a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board. Patients with primary lesions in other head and neck sites were excluded.

Case 1

A 2-year-old Caucasian boy presented with a right upper lip mass and ipsilateral cervical lymphadenopathy. Biopsy of primary site and lymph node excisional biopsy were followed by gross total surgical resection. Pathologic examination showed a tumor composed of solid nests and sheets of monotonous, small malignant cells with cytologic features suggestive of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). Mitotic figures and karyorrhectic tumor cells were frequent, and several areas of geographic necrosis were present. Immunohistochemical staining showed diffuse desmin reactivity in the tumor cytoplasm, and myogenin reactivity in more than 95% of tumor nuclei, supporting the diagnosis of alveolar RMS (fig. 1a, b). There were no sites of metastatic disease on pre-therapy evaluation, and the patient was categorized as clinical group II, stage 1, intermediate risk. He received chemotherapy with vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) with radiotherapy for local control (41.4 Gy in 23 fractions). Complete response was seen with no evidence of disease at end-of-therapy evaluation.
Fig. 1

Histologic and immunohistochemical features of OMF sarcomas. Case 1 shows solid nests of tumor cells with round nuclei and scant eosinophilic cytoplasm (a, 40× objective magnification). Linear arrangement of the tumor cells was focally seen at the edges of the nests of tumor cells (a, arrowhead). Immunohistochemical staining for myogenin demonstrated reactivity in nearly all tumor nuclei (b, 40× objective magnification). Biopsies of Case 2 show nests of tumor cells infiltrating skeletal muscle (c, arrowheads, 20× objective magnifications). The tumor cells show round nuclei and frequent single cells undergoing mitosis or karyorrhexis (d, 40× objective magnification). Case 3 shows spindle cells in a myxoid matrix and relative nuclear pleomorphism compared with Cases 1 and 2 (e, 40× objective magnification). Myogenin immunohistochemical staining highlights less than half of the tumor nuclei (f, 40× objective magnification). The tumor cells of Case 4 show spindle cells arranged in short curved fascicles with scattered dilated and branching vascular spaces (g, 10× objective magnification). Focal areas of the tumor demonstrate intermixed epithelial elements (h, 20× objective magnification).

Thirteen months after the original diagnosis, a left frontal lobe mass was discovered and resected. This demonstrated similar pathological findings to his original tumor. Molecular studies were performed and demonstrated a fusion of the PAX3 and FOXO1 genes. He received chemotherapy with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with ifosfamide and etoposide, and intrathecal chemotherapy. Local control was achieved with 45 Gy radiotherapy in 25 fractions. Twenty months later, a solitary right leg mass was resected, and pathology confirmed relapsed alveolar RMS. He received cyclophosphamide and topotecan and underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with a preparatory regimen of vincristine, melphalan, and thiotepa. He remained in remission for 8 months until he developed right eye swelling and was found to have an orbital mass; this was partially resected and re-demonstrated alveolar RMS. He again received radiotherapy (44.6 Gy in 25 fractions). Four months later, he developed a left lung nodule which was biopsied and confirmed disease relapse. He received lung radiation with 10 Gy but ultimately succumbed to his disease 5 weeks later, 46 months from his original diagnosis.

Case 2

A 13-year-old Caucasian girl presented with a 2 × 2.5 × 3 cm right masseter muscle mass which was completely resected. Pathologic examination showed a tumor composed of small nests of small round cells infiltrating skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. The cells showed scant eosinophilic cytoplasm, with cytologic features suggestive of RMS, similar to Case 1. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed this impression, showing focal desmin reactivity (fig. 1c, d). There was no metastatic disease on staging evaluation. She was diagnosed with alveolar RMS, clinical group II, stage 1, intermediate risk. She received chemotherapy with VAC as well as radiation therapy (41.4 Gy in 23 fractions) and was in remission at the end of therapy. She had a complete response and continues to be in remission at her last follow-up 102 months from her original diagnosis.

Case 3

A 4-year-old Caucasian girl presented with a 3 × 2 cm left-sided maxillary mass, which was partially resected. Pathology demonstrated a variably cellular tumor composed of poorly differentiated round to spindle cells with myxoid stroma. The nuclei showed moderate pleomorphism, and mitotic figures were frequent. Immunohistochemical staining showed strong cytoplasmic desmin reactivity, and myogenin reactivity was seen in less than 50% of the tumor nuclei, supporting the diagnosis of embryonal RMS (fig. 1e, f). There was no metastatic disease on staging evaluation. She was diagnosed with group III, stage 3, intermediate-risk embryonal RMS. She underwent radiation therapy with a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions and also received chemotherapy with VAC. Four months later, she developed a local recurrence in the same area, which was again completely resected. She received additional radiotherapy with 30 Gy in 15 fractions, as well as further chemotherapy with vincristine and ifosfamide/etoposide. Ten months later, she developed a third local recurrence, for which she underwent a gross total resection, radiation therapy at a dose of 10 Gy, and chemotherapy with topotecan. Eight months later (42 months after primary diagnosis), she developed metastatic disease in her lungs and died due to complications of pneumonia.

Case 4

A 4-year-old Caucasian boy presented with a rapidly enlarging tongue lesion. Microscopically, sections demonstrated a densely cellular tumor composed of poorly differentiated spindle cells with areas containing epithelial elements (fig. 1g, h). Many dilated and branching vascular spaces were present, and focal areas were less cellular with myxoid stroma. Mitotic figures were abundant. Immunohistochemical staining was negative for desmin and myogenin. Pancytokeratin and epithelial membrane antigen stains showed reactivity in many spindle cells, and highlighted the epithelial elements. RT-PCR testing identified a fusion of the SS18 and SSX1 genes, confirming the diagnosis of synovial sarcoma. No evidence of metastatic disease was identified on pre-therapy evaluation. He underwent a gross total resection of the lesion with reconstruction of his tongue using fasciocutaneous left radial forearm free flap. Due to airway safety concerns, a tracheostomy tube was placed at the same time and was subsequently removed 2 weeks later. Radiation therapy after surgical resection was deferred despite narrow negative margins due to concern for associated morbidity. He completed chemotherapy with 6 cycles of ifosfamide and doxorubicin and continues to be disease-free 36 months after his original diagnosis.

Discussion

We report four cases of STS occurring in the OMF region at a tertiary care pediatric center over a 15-year period. The broad differential diagnosis of lesions in the OMF region is described in table 1. The rarity of STS in this region and the preponderance of RMS noted at our institution are consistent with data from larger epidemiological studies [3]. Pathology showed overlapping poorly differentiated features, demonstrating the importance of immunohistochemistry and molecular testing in confirming the diagnoses. The diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology for primary diagnosis and recurrences have been reported in tumors of the OMF region with a sensitivity of 96.2% and specificity of 99.4% [4].
Table 1

Differential diagnosis of soft tissue masses of the mouth and face in children

CongenitalInfectiousBenignMalignant

Dermoid cyst

Hemangioma

Lymphangioma

Lymphadenitis

Odontogenic infection

Parotitis

Periorbital/orbital cellulitis

Soft tissue cellulitis/abscess

Angiofibroma

Dermoid cyst

Hemangioma

Inclusion cyst

Keloid

Lipoma

Lymphangioma

Neurofibroma

Pilomatrixoma

Squamous cell papilloma

Angiosarcoma

Alveolar soft part sarcoma

Lymphoma (Hodgkin's vs. non-Hodgkin's)

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans

Epithelioid sarcoma

Langerhans cell histiocytosis

Malignant fibrous histiocytoma

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor

Neuroblastoma

Rhabdomyosarcoma

Synovial sarcoma

Salivary gland neoplasms

Undifferentiated sarcoma

These four cases highlight several important multidisciplinary aspects of managing these patients, primarily the difficulty associated with local control of malignancies in this region. Cases 1 and 3 endured multiple local and distant recurrences. Case 3, in particular, demonstrates the difficulty of achieving adequate local control. Current recommendations include optimizing surgical resection even at metastatic sites; however, this is generally not feasible with widely metastatic disease. Radiation therapy, however, is readily utilized for metastatic sites and as well as grossly resected disease with positive margins. With the advent and precision of new technologies, there is an increasing interest in proton beam radiotherapy as it has been shown to have utility in the treatment of head and neck malignancies [5]. The primary advantage is the ability to spare surrounding normal tissues from unintended irradiation. For patients with oropharyngeal cancer, decreased symptoms of dysphagia and xerostomia have been reported [6]. A head-to-head comparison of intensity-modulated photon therapy with intensity-modulated proton therapy is ongoing, and the results from this trial will quantify the clinical benefit to patients from the reduction of dose to nontarget tissues [7]. Fewer than 20% of RMS are resected with negative margins [8], and radiation therapy has a well-known role in the management of RMS. Coordination between surgeons, oncologists, and radiation oncologists with consideration of modality with least morbidity is of the utmost importance as demonstrated in Case 4. It is not surprising that the two patients (Cases 1 and 3) who suffered multiple episodes of recurrent disease ultimately succumbed to their disease. Additionally, the three cases with RMS are examples of the heterogeneous outcomes observed in intermediate-risk RMS [8] and highlight the need for better risk stratification methods for these patients. The tumor in Case 1 was positive for the PAX3/FOXO1 fusion gene product, which is known to be a poor prognostic marker [9]. Yet without integration of PAX3/FOXO1 into stratification algorithms, he was considered to have intermediate-risk disease. Preliminary gene expression profiling work in pediatric RMS has been performed [10], and further studies are currently underway attempting to better understand the biological implications for risk stratification in RMS in particular and STS in general [11]. Our four cases represent a large case series of pediatric OMF STS, reinforcing the rarity and the spectrum of these malignancies. Individual pediatric case reports have reported rare OMF STS tumors such as leiomyosarcoma [12], alveolar soft part sarcoma [13], and fibrosarcoma [14]. We highlight the various presentations, approaches to management, and distribution of STS in the OMF region, and challenges faced to achieve satisfactory local control.

Statement of Ethics

The authors have no ethical conflicts to disclose.

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.
  14 in total

1.  Rapidly growing mass in mandibular gingiva.

Authors:  Chieh-Yuan Cheng; Kuo-Ming Chang; Kuo-Wei Chang; Chia-Hoa Chang; Chung-Ji Liu; George M Kushner
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Oral and maxillofacial tumours in children: a review.

Authors:  M Sato; N Tanaka; T Sato; T Amagasa
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.651

3.  Potential benefits of scanned intensity-modulated proton therapy versus advanced photon therapy with regard to sparing of the salivary glands in oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Tara A van de Water; Antony J Lomax; Hendrik P Bijl; Marije E de Jong; Cornelis Schilstra; Eugen B Hug; Johannes A Langendijk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Pediatric head and neck malignancies: US incidence and trends over 2 decades.

Authors:  James T Albright; Alan K Topham; James S Reilly
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-06

Review 5.  Pediatric sarcomas and related tumors of the head and neck.

Authors:  Winston W Huh; Nancy Fitzgerald; Anita Mahajan; Erich M Sturgis; R Beverly Raney; Peter M Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 12.111

6.  Gene expression profiling for survival prediction in pediatric rhabdomyosarcomas: a report from the children's oncology group.

Authors:  Elai Davicioni; James R Anderson; Jonathan D Buckley; William H Meyer; Timothy J Triche
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Comprehensive genomic analysis of rhabdomyosarcoma reveals a landscape of alterations affecting a common genetic axis in fusion-positive and fusion-negative tumors.

Authors:  Jack F Shern; Li Chen; Juliann Chmielecki; Jun S Wei; Rajesh Patidar; Mara Rosenberg; Lauren Ambrogio; Daniel Auclair; Jianjun Wang; Young K Song; Catherine Tolman; Laura Hurd; Hongling Liao; Shile Zhang; Dominik Bogen; Andrew S Brohl; Sivasish Sindiri; Daniel Catchpoole; Thomas Badgett; Gad Getz; Jaume Mora; James R Anderson; Stephen X Skapek; Frederic G Barr; Matthew Meyerson; Douglas S Hawkins; Javed Khan
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 8.  Soft tissue sarcomas in children.

Authors:  A S Pappo; D M Parham; B N Rao; T E Lobe
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-03

9.  Intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) for patients with oropharynx cancer - A case matched analysis.

Authors:  Pierre Blanchard; Adam S Garden; G Brandon Gunn; David I Rosenthal; William H Morrison; Mike Hernandez; Joseph Crutison; Jack J Lee; Rong Ye; C David Fuller; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Kate A Hutcheson; Emma B Holliday; Nikhil G Thaker; Erich M Sturgis; Merrill S Kies; X Ronald Zhu; Radhe Mohan; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 10.  Proton radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a review of the clinical experience to date.

Authors:  Emma B Holliday; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.