Literature DB >> 2772142

Radiobiology of ultrasoft X rays. III. Normal human fibroblasts and the significance of terminal track structure in cell inactivation.

M N Cornforth1, M E Schillaci, D T Goodhead, S G Carpenter, M E Wilder, R J Sebring, M R Raju.   

Abstract

Ultrasoft characteristic X rays from carbon (0.28 keV) are severely attenuated as they pass through biological material, causing a nonuniform distribution of dose to cell nuclei. Complications of studying ultrasoft X rays can be minimized in this context by using cells with very thin cytoplasm and nuclei (e.g., less than the attenuation length of the X rays), and which exhibit a more nearly exponential dose response to cell killing, such as normal human fibroblasts compared with V79 cells. Using this cell system, we report the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of A1-K and C-K X rays to be near unity. Previous studies of cell inactivation by characteristic carbon X rays gave RBEs of 3 to 4, supporting the idea that localized energy depositions from secondary electrons and primary track ends represent the principal mode of biological action for other low-LET radiations. In part, the reported high RBEs result from the use of mean dose to describe energy deposited within the cell nuclei by these poorly penetrating radiations. Implicit in the use of mean dose is that cellular damage varies linearly with dose within a critical target(s), an assumption that is of questionable validity for cells that exhibit pronounced curvilinear dose responses. The simplest interpretation of the present findings is that most energy depositions caused by track-end effects are not necessarily more damaging than the sparsely ionizing component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2772142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  4 in total

1.  Nontargeted stressful effects in normal human fibroblast cultures exposed to low fluences of high charge, high energy (HZE) particles: kinetics of biologic responses and significance of secondary radiations.

Authors:  Géraldine Gonon; Jean-Emmanuel Groetz; Sonia M de Toledo; Roger W Howell; Michel Fromm; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  The LET dependence of unrepaired chromosome damage in human cells: a break too far?

Authors:  Bradford D Loucas; Michael N Cornforth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Chromosome damage in human cells by γ rays, α particles and heavy ions: track interactions in basic dose-response relationships.

Authors:  Bradford D Loucas; Marco Durante; Susan M Bailey; Michael N Cornforth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Geometrical Properties of the Nucleus and Chromosome Intermingling Are Possible Major Parameters of Chromosome Aberration Formation.

Authors:  Floriane Poignant; Ianik Plante; Zarana S Patel; Janice L Huff; Tony C Slaba
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 6.208

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.