| Literature DB >> 27721372 |
Zhenzhao Jia1, Caizhen Li1, Xinqi Li1, Junren Shi2,3, Zhimin Liao1,3, Dapeng Yu1,3, Xiaosong Wu1,3.
Abstract
Discovery of Weyl semimetals has revived interest in Weyl fermions which has not been observed in high energy experiments. It now becomes possible to study, in solids, their exotic properties. Extensive photoemission spectroscopy and electrical resistivity experiments have been carried out. However, many other properties remain unexplored. Here we show the thermoelectric signature of the chiral anomaly of Weyl fermions in Cd3As2 under a magnetic field. We observe a strong quadratic suppression of the thermopower when the magnetic field is parallel to the temperature gradient. The quadratic coefficient is nearly twice of that for the electrical conductivity. The thermopower reverses its sign in high fields. We show that all these intriguing observations can be understood in terms of the chiral anomaly of Weyl fermions. Our results reveal the anomalous thermoelectric property of Weyl fermions and provide insight into the chiral anomaly.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27721372 PMCID: PMC5062373 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Temperature dependence of ρ and S.
(a) ρ as a function of temperature. Inset, an optical micrograph of a device. The scale bar is 20 μm. (b) Thermopower S as a function of temperature.
Figure 2Resistivity and thermoelectric effects in a perpendicular field.
(a) Large positive MR at various temperatures. (b) Change of the thermopower with the magnetic field ΔS=S(B)−S(0). (c) Nernst effect S versus the magnetic field. The black dash–dot lines are fits to equations (2) and (3) at T=10, 25 and 40 K. The inset in c is a zoom-in plot. (d) Fitted mobility μ versus temperature. Red squares are obtained from S and blue triangles are from S. The error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals of fits.
Figure 3Resistivity and thermoelectric effects in a parallel field.
(a) Large negative MR at various temperatures. (b) Thermopower S versus the magnetic field. (c) Conductivity versus B2. (d) Thermopower versus B2.
The coefficients of the B2 dependence for σ and S.
| 10 | 0.0255 | 0.0489 | 1.92 | 6.27 | 14.5 |
| 25 | 0.0527 | 0.0899 | 1.71 | 4.36 | 30.1 |
| 40 | 0.0844 | 0.0139 | 1.65 | 3.44 | 48.1 |
Figure 4Fit the thermopower S to equation (6).
T=10(red), 25(blue) and 40 K(light green). Dash–dot lines are fitting curves.