AIMS: Ticagrelor has shown greater, more rapid and more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. However, the superiority of ticagrelor for preventing ischaemic damage in STEMI patients has not been proven. The aim of this trial was to assess whether ticagrelor is superior to clopidogrel in preventing microvascular injury in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients with STEMI underwent prospective random assignment to receive a loading dose (LD) of clopidogrel 600 mg or ticagrelor 180 mg (1:1 ratio) before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). As the primary endpoint, the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) was measured immediately after primary PCI. The secondary endpoint was the infarct size estimated from the wall motion score index (WMSI). A total of 76 patients were enrolled (clopidogrel group=38, ticagrelor group=38). The IMR in the ticagrelor group was significantly lower than that in the clopidogrel group (22.2±18.0 vs. 34.4±18.8 U, p=0.005). Cardiac enzymes were less elevated in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (CK peak; 2,651±1,710 vs. 3,139±2,698 ng/ml, p=0.06). Infarct size, estimated by WMSI, was not different between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups at baseline (1.55±0.30 vs. 1.61±0.29, p=0.41) or after three months (1.42±0.33 vs. 1.47±0.33, p=0.57). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI, a 180 mg LD of ticagrelor might be more effective in reducing microvascular injury than a 600 mg LD of clopidogrel, as demonstrated by IMR immediately after primary PCI.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Ticagrelor has shown greater, more rapid and more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. However, the superiority of ticagrelor for preventing ischaemic damage in STEMI patients has not been proven. The aim of this trial was to assess whether ticagrelor is superior to clopidogrel in preventing microvascular injury in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients with STEMI underwent prospective random assignment to receive a loading dose (LD) of clopidogrel 600 mg or ticagrelor 180 mg (1:1 ratio) before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). As the primary endpoint, the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) was measured immediately after primary PCI. The secondary endpoint was the infarct size estimated from the wall motion score index (WMSI). A total of 76 patients were enrolled (clopidogrel group=38, ticagrelor group=38). The IMR in the ticagrelor group was significantly lower than that in the clopidogrel group (22.2±18.0 vs. 34.4±18.8 U, p=0.005). Cardiac enzymes were less elevated in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (CK peak; 2,651±1,710 vs. 3,139±2,698 ng/ml, p=0.06). Infarct size, estimated by WMSI, was not different between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups at baseline (1.55±0.30 vs. 1.61±0.29, p=0.41) or after three months (1.42±0.33 vs. 1.47±0.33, p=0.57). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI, a 180 mg LD of ticagrelor might be more effective in reducing microvascular injury than a 600 mg LD of clopidogrel, as demonstrated by IMR immediately after primary PCI.
Authors: David Carrick; Caroline Haig; Nadeem Ahmed; Jaclyn Carberry; Vannesa Teng Yue May; Margaret McEntegart; Mark C Petrie; Hany Eteiba; Mitchell Lindsay; Stuart Hood; Stuart Watkins; Andrew Davie; Ahmed Mahrous; Ify Mordi; Ian Ford; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Keith G Oldroyd; Colin Berry Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mohammed Ahmed Akkaif; Nur Aizati Athirah Daud; Abubakar Sha'aban; Mei Li Ng; Muhamad Ali Sk Abdul Kader; Dzul Azri Mohamed Noor; Baharudin Ibrahim Journal: Molecules Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 4.411