Literature DB >> 27721202

Improved kinect-based spatiotemporal and kinematic treadmill gait assessment.

Moataz Eltoukhy1, Jeonghoon Oh1, Christopher Kuenze2, Joseph Signorile3.   

Abstract

A cost-effective, clinician friendly gait assessment tool that can automatically track patients' anatomical landmarks can provide practitioners with important information that is useful in prescribing rehabilitative and preventive therapies. This study investigated the validity and reliability of the Microsoft Kinect v2 as a potential inexpensive gait analysis tool. Ten healthy subjects walked on a treadmill at 1.3 and 1.6m·s-1, as spatiotemporal parameters and kinematics were extracted concurrently using the Kinect and three-dimensional motion analysis. Spatiotemporal measures included step length and width, step and stride times, vertical and mediolateral pelvis motion, and foot swing velocity. Kinematic outcomes included hip, knee, and ankle joint angles in the sagittal plane. The absolute agreement and relative consistency between the two systems were assessed using interclass correlations coefficients (ICC2,1), while reproducibility between systems was established using Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (rc). Comparison of ensemble curves and associated 90% confidence intervals (CI90) of the hip, knee, and ankle joint angles were performed to investigate if the Kinect sensor could consistently and accurately assess lower extremity joint motion throughout the gait cycle. Results showed that the Kinect v2 sensor has the potential to be an effective clinical assessment tool for sagittal plane knee and hip joint kinematics, as well as some spatiotemporal temporal variables including pelvis displacement and step characteristics during the gait cycle. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Gait analysis; Kinect; Optoelectronic motion capture; Treadmill gait

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27721202     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  25 in total

1.  Visual Biofeedback and Changes in Lower Extremity Kinematics in Individuals With Medial Knee Displacement.

Authors:  Ashley N Marshall; Jay Hertel; Joseph M Hart; Shawn Russell; Susan A Saliba
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Vision-based gait impairment analysis for aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Javier Ortells; María Trinidad Herrero-Ezquerro; Ramón A Mollineda
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Running Footwear and Impact Peak Differences in Recreational Runners.

Authors:  Federico Roggio; Bruno Trovato; Marta Zanghì; Luca Petrigna; Gianluca Testa; Vito Pavone; Giuseppe Musumeci
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Verification of gait analysis method fusing camera-based pose estimation and an IMU sensor in various gait conditions.

Authors:  Masataka Yamamoto; Koji Shimatani; Yuto Ishige; Hiroshi Takemura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  A Video-Based Classification System for Assessing Locomotor Skills in Children.

Authors:  Daniel H K Chow; Wilson H W Cheng; Simone S M Tam
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Measuring Gait Variables Using Computer Vision to Assess Mobility and Fall Risk in Older Adults With Dementia.

Authors:  Kimberley-Dale Ng; Sina Mehdizadeh; Andrea Iaboni; Avril Mansfield; Alastair Flint; Babak Taati
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.316

7.  Kinect V2 Performance Assessment in Daily-Life Gestures: Cohort Study on Healthy Subjects for a Reference Database for Automated Instrumental Evaluations on Neurological Patients.

Authors:  Alessandro Scano; Andrea Chiavenna; Matteo Malosio; Lorenzo Molinari Tosatti
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 1.781

8.  Investigating the impact of a motion capture system on Microsoft Kinect v2 recordings: A caution for using the technologies together.

Authors:  MReza Naeemabadi; Birthe Dinesen; Ole Kæseler Andersen; John Hansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Simple benchmarking method for determining the accuracy of depth cameras in body landmark location estimation: Static upright posture as a measurement example.

Authors:  Pin-Ling Liu; Chien-Chi Chang; Jia-Hua Lin; Yoshiyuki Kobayashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Validation of Foot Placement Locations from Ankle Data of a Kinect v2 Sensor.

Authors:  Daphne Geerse; Bert Coolen; Detmar Kolijn; Melvyn Roerdink
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.