Literature DB >> 27720789

Assessment of Breathlessness in Lung Cancer: Psychometric Properties of the Dyspnea-12 Questionnaire.

Jing-Yu Tan1, Janelle Yorke2, Amelie Harle3, Jacky Smith4, Fiona Blackhall5, Mark Pilling6, Alex Molassiotis1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The Dyspnea-12 (D-12) Questionnaire is a well-validated instrument in respiratory illnesses for breathlessness assessment, but its psychometric properties have not been tested in lung cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the psychometric properties of the D-12 in lung cancer patients.
METHODS: Baseline data from a lung cancer feasibility trial were adopted for this analysis. D-12 and a series of patient-reported tools, including five Numeric Rating Scales (NRS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS), were used for the psychometric assessment. Spearman's correlation coefficients (rs) were used to estimate the convergent validity of the D-12 with the NRS, HADS, and LCSS. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to examine construct validity. Reliability was tested by Cronbach's alpha and item-to-total correlations. D-12 score difference between patients with or without anxiety, depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was explored to identify its discriminate performance.
RESULTS: One hundred and one lung cancer patients were included. There were significantly positive correlations between the D-12 and the HADS, LCSS, and NRS measuring breathlessness severity and its associated affective distress. Factor analysis clearly identified two components (physical and emotional) of the D-12. Cronbach's alpha for D-12 total, physical, and emotional subscales was 0.95, 0.92, and 0.94, respectively. Patients with anxiety or depression demonstrated significantly higher D-12 scores than those without it, and patients with COPD reported significantly more severe breathlessness than those without COPD.
CONCLUSION: The D-12 is a valid and reliable self-reported questionnaire for use in breathlessness assessment in lung cancer patients.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breathlessness; lung cancer; psychometrics; reliability; scale; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27720789     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  5 in total

1.  Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the DEG, a Three-Item Dyspnea Measure.

Authors:  Duc M Ha; Lubin R Deng; Allison V Lange; Jeffrey J Swigris; David B Bekelman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 6.473

2.  Evaluation of the Norwegian version of the Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire in patients with COPD.

Authors:  Andrew Malcolm Garratt; Ellen Margrethe Nerheim; Gunnar Einvik; Knut Stavem; Anne Edvardsen
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2022-05

3.  Measuring dyspnoea: new multidimensional instruments to match our 21st century understanding.

Authors:  Robert B Banzett; Shakeeb H Moosavi
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  Terminological Usage Related to Dyspnea by Nursing Staff: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Survey.

Authors:  Yuko Nemoto; Sayuri Suzuki; Shinichiro Okauchi; Katsunori Kagohashi; Hiroaki Satoh
Journal:  Asian Pac Isl Nurs J       Date:  2020

5.  Clinical validation of the Swedish version of Dyspnoea-12 instrument in outpatients with cardiorespiratory disease.

Authors:  Josefin Sundh; Hans Bornefalk; Carl Magnus Sköld; Christer Janson; Anders Blomberg; Jacob Sandberg; Anna Bornefalk-Hermansson; Helena Igelström; Magnus Ekström
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2019-09-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.