Literature DB >> 27720621

Males Can Benefit from Sexual Cannibalism Facilitated by Self-Sacrifice.

Steven K Schwartz1, William E Wagner2, Eileen A Hebets2.   

Abstract

In a number of species, males are cannibalized by females after mating (reviewed in [1, 2]), and some males actually appear to facilitate their own cannibalism (reviewed in [3]). Such self-sacrifice can evolve if being eaten sufficiently enhances either fertilization success (mating effort) or offspring number or fitness (paternal effort). While there is some support for the mating-effort hypothesis, few studies have found support for paternal effort. We used two experiments to test the paternal-effort hypothesis in the dark fishing spider, Dolomedes tenebrosus. Males of this species provide themselves as a material contribution: they spontaneously die during copulation and are subsequently eaten by females. In support of the paternal-effort predictions, when females were allowed to consume their mating partner, we found large and significant increases in (1) the number, (2) the size, and (3) the survivorship of the offspring. Similar benefits were not seen when females were allowed to consume a cricket in lieu of a male, suggesting that it is the consumption of the male's body per se that is responsible for these fitness benefits. Together, our results suggest that D. tenebrosus males can benefit from self-sacrifice behavior through paternal effort. Such behavior may be particularly likely to evolve when high rates of postcopulatory cannibalism trap males into investing in their first mate instead of investing in acquiring additional matings and/or if strong first-male sperm precedence reduces the benefits of both investing in additional matings and paternity protection.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dolomedes tenebrosus; Pisauridae; dark fishing spider; monogyny; paternal effort; paternal investment; self-sacrifice; sexual cannibalism; sexual conflict; spontaneous death

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27720621     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  5 in total

Review 1.  Descending control of nociception in insects?

Authors:  Matilda Gibbons; Sajedeh Sarlak; Lars Chittka
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Resource competition explains rare cannibalism in the wild in livebearing fishes.

Authors:  Rüdiger Riesch; Márcio S Araújo; Stuart Bumgarner; Caitlynn Filla; Laura Pennafort; Taylor R Goins; Darlene Lucion; Amber M Makowicz; Ryan A Martin; Sara Pirroni; R Brian Langerhans
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 3.  Nociceptive Biology of Molluscs and Arthropods: Evolutionary Clues About Functions and Mechanisms Potentially Related to Pain.

Authors:  Edgar T Walters
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Record breaking achievements by spiders and the scientists who study them.

Authors:  Stefano Mammola; Peter Michalik; Eileen A Hebets; Marco Isaia
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Sexual cannibalism and population viability.

Authors:  Adam M Fisher; Stephen J Cornell; Gregory I Holwell; Tom A R Price
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-24       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.