Linda P Cho1, Matthias Manuel2, Paul Catalano3, Larissa Lee4, Antonio L Damato4, Robert A Cormack4, Ivan Buzurovic4, Mandar Bhagwat2, Desmond O'Farrell2, Phillip M Devlin4, Akila N Viswanathan5. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: lcho7@jhu.edu. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: anv@jhu.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for stage I-II cervical-cancer patients treated using computed-tomography (CT)-planned high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (BT). METHODS: A total of 150 patients were treated for Stage I-II cervical cancer using CT-planned BT between 4/2004 and 10/2014. Of these, 128 were eligible for inclusion. Kaplan-Meier local control (LC), pelvic control (PC), overall survival (OS), and PFS estimates were calculated. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 30months, the 2-year LC rate was 96%, PFS was 88%, and OS was 88%. Overall, 18 patients (14%) experienced any recurrence (AR), 8 had distant recurrence only and 10 had a combination of local, pelvic, regional, and distant recurrence. No patients had LR only. A prognostic factor for AR was tumor size >4cm (p=0.01). Patients with tumors >4cm were 3.3 times more likely to have AR than those with tumors ≤4cm (hazard ratio [HR]=3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-9.47). Point A was 85% of prescription for tumors < 4 cm and decreased approximately 3% over 5 fractions compared to 90% of prescription for tumors > 4 cm that decreased approximately 4% over 5 fractions. Two patients (2%) experienced grade≥2 late toxicity. There were no acute or late grade≥3 toxicities. CONCLUSION: CT-planned BT resulted in excellent local control and survival. Large tumor size was associated with an increased risk of recurrence outside the radiation field and worse PFS and OS. A volume-optimized plan treated a smaller area than a point A standard plan for patients with Stage I-II cervical cancer that have received chemoradiation. Given the outstanding LC achieved with modern therapy including chemoradiation, HDR, and image-based BT, further efforts to combat spread outside the radiation field with novel therapies are warranted.
OBJECTIVE: To determine prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for stage I-II cervical-cancerpatients treated using computed-tomography (CT)-planned high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (BT). METHODS: A total of 150 patients were treated for Stage I-II cervical cancer using CT-planned BT between 4/2004 and 10/2014. Of these, 128 were eligible for inclusion. Kaplan-Meier local control (LC), pelvic control (PC), overall survival (OS), and PFS estimates were calculated. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 30months, the 2-year LC rate was 96%, PFS was 88%, and OS was 88%. Overall, 18 patients (14%) experienced any recurrence (AR), 8 had distant recurrence only and 10 had a combination of local, pelvic, regional, and distant recurrence. No patients had LR only. A prognostic factor for AR was tumor size >4cm (p=0.01). Patients with tumors >4cm were 3.3 times more likely to have AR than those with tumors ≤4cm (hazard ratio [HR]=3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-9.47). Point A was 85% of prescription for tumors < 4 cm and decreased approximately 3% over 5 fractions compared to 90% of prescription for tumors > 4 cm that decreased approximately 4% over 5 fractions. Two patients (2%) experienced grade≥2 late toxicity. There were no acute or late grade≥3 toxicities. CONCLUSION: CT-planned BT resulted in excellent local control and survival. Large tumor size was associated with an increased risk of recurrence outside the radiation field and worse PFS and OS. A volume-optimized plan treated a smaller area than a point A standard plan for patients with Stage I-II cervical cancer that have received chemoradiation. Given the outstanding LC achieved with modern therapy including chemoradiation, HDR, and image-based BT, further efforts to combat spread outside the radiation field with novel therapies are warranted.