Literature DB >> 27720415

Subscapularis tendon loading during activities of daily living.

Elizabeth B Gausden1, Moira M McCarthy2, Andreas Kontaxis2, Keith T Corpus2, Lawrence V Gulotta2, Anne M Kelly2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative amount of load that is transmitted through the superior portion of the subscapularis during activities of daily living as compared with the load that is transmitted through the middle and inferior portions in a normal shoulder and in a shoulder with a supraspinatus tear.
METHODS: By use of the Newcastle shoulder model, the subscapularis was modeled with 3 lines of action encircling the humeral head. The load was measured in the entire subscapularis, and the percentage of this load in each of the 3 tendinous bands was calculated. Subsequently, a supraspinatus tear was simulated, and the forces generated by the subscapularis and glenohumeral joint contact forces were measured.
RESULTS: The maximum force produced by the entire subscapularis muscle for the various activities ranged from 3 to 43 N. Load sharing between the 3 subscapularis bands showed that the superior band bore the largest percentage of the total load of the muscle (95% ± 2%). The load in the subscapularis, particularly in the superior band, increased significantly when a supraspinatus tear was simulated (P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: The superior band of the subscapularis tendon bears the highest percentage of load compared with the middle or inferior band. The load in the subscapularis increased significantly in the presence of a simulated supraspinatus tear. Because a disproportionate amount of force is transmitted through the superior subscapularis, more clinical research is warranted to determine whether tears in this region should be routinely repaired.
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Subscapularis tendon; anterosuperior rotator cuff tears; glenohumeral joint contact forces; rotator cuff biomechanics; rotator cuff tendons; shoulder biomechanics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27720415     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  6 in total

1.  Repair of Lafosse I subscapularis lesions brings no benefit in anterosuperior rotator cuff reconstruction.

Authors:  Barbara Wirth; Sebastian Kunz; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; Matthias Flury; Maximilian Lenz; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Dynamic thoracohumeral kinematics are dependent upon the etiology of the shoulder injury.

Authors:  Juan López-Pascual; Álvaro Page; Pilar Serra-Añó
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Arthroscopic-Assisted Pectoralis Minor Transfer for Irreparable Anterosuperior Massive Rotator Cuff Tear.

Authors:  Kotaro Yamakado
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2018-02-05

4.  Risk Factors for Rotator Cuff Disease: An Experimental Study on Intact Human Subscapularis Tendons.

Authors:  Fabian Plachel; Philipp Moroder; Renate Gehwolf; Herbert Tempfer; Andrea Wagner; Alexander Auffarth; Nicholas Matis; Stephan Pauly; Mark Tauber; Andreas Traweger
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Comparison of Biomechanical Failure Loads Between Tape-Type and Conventional Sutures in Internal Knotless Anchor-Based Constructs.

Authors:  Hao-Chun Chuang; Joe-Zhi Yen; Chih-Kai Hong; Kai-Lan Hsu; Fa-Chuan Kuan; Yueh Chen; Hao-Ming Chang; Wei-Ren Su
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-24

6.  Arthroscopic Suture-Bridge Repair of the Subscapularis Tendon-"Inside and Outside the Box" With Preservation of the Comma Sign.

Authors:  Falk Gröger; Michael Hackl; Eduard Buess
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-12-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.