BACKGROUND: There is no consensual opinion regarding the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure for unprotected distal left main (UDLM) lesion. METHODS: Between April 2005 and August 2011, 586 consecutive patients with UDLM stenosis treated with drug-eluting stents were recruited for this study to clarify the impact of combination of full-coverage stenting and proximal optimization technique (POT) for UDLM lesion. An optimal strategy of full-coverage stenting and POT was performed in 353 patients and the other 233 patients were not optimally treated. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization (TLR) during follow-up period. TLRs were also evaluated for main branch (MB) restenosis. RESULTS: At 1615days of follow-up, MACE occurred in 166 (28.3%) patients. The occurrence of MACE and TLR had a trend to being lower in the optimal strategy [propensity score-adjusted HR, 0.73 (95% CI, 0.53-1.01), p=0.05 and propensity score-adjusted HR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.46-1.02), p=0.06, respectively]. TLR of the MB occurred significantly less frequently in the optimal strategy [propensity score-adjusted HR, 0.34 (95% CI, 0.15-0.76), p=0.008]. Cardiac death occurred in 28 (4.8%) patients. There was no significant difference in cardiac death between the two groups. These results were sustained after propensity-score matching. CONCLUSIONS: An optimal PCI strategy of full-coverage stenting and POT might be effective for UDLM lesion to reduce the occurrence of MACE, especially driven by TLR of the MB.
BACKGROUND: There is no consensual opinion regarding the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure for unprotected distal left main (UDLM) lesion. METHODS: Between April 2005 and August 2011, 586 consecutive patients with UDLM stenosis treated with drug-eluting stents were recruited for this study to clarify the impact of combination of full-coverage stenting and proximal optimization technique (POT) for UDLM lesion. An optimal strategy of full-coverage stenting and POT was performed in 353 patients and the other 233 patients were not optimally treated. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization (TLR) during follow-up period. TLRs were also evaluated for main branch (MB) restenosis. RESULTS: At 1615days of follow-up, MACE occurred in 166 (28.3%) patients. The occurrence of MACE and TLR had a trend to being lower in the optimal strategy [propensity score-adjusted HR, 0.73 (95% CI, 0.53-1.01), p=0.05 and propensity score-adjusted HR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.46-1.02), p=0.06, respectively]. TLR of the MB occurred significantly less frequently in the optimal strategy [propensity score-adjusted HR, 0.34 (95% CI, 0.15-0.76), p=0.008]. Cardiac death occurred in 28 (4.8%) patients. There was no significant difference in cardiac death between the two groups. These results were sustained after propensity-score matching. CONCLUSIONS: An optimal PCI strategy of full-coverage stenting and POT might be effective for UDLM lesion to reduce the occurrence of MACE, especially driven by TLR of the MB.