Literature DB >> 27720340

A Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Stair Use.

Cally A Jennings1, Lira Yun2, Christina C Loitz2, Eun-Young Lee2, W Kerry Mummery2.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Stair climbing is an accessible activity that can be incorporated into one's daily lifestyle to increase physical activity levels and provide health benefits. This review summarizes the effectiveness of stair interventions and explores key differences that may influence intervention effectiveness. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Interventions to increase stair use published from January 1990 to July 2015 were identified in PubMed, Sport Discus, Web of Science, Environment Complete, CINAHL, Trial Register of Promoting Health Interventions, Embase, Scopus, and PsycINFO. Eligibility criteria included original studies, published in peer-reviewed journals, targeting adult samples, and clearly describing intervention design and results. Studies were also required to measure the use of stairs compared with an elevator, escalator, or moving stairway at baseline and during at least one timepoint when the intervention was in effect. Studies were required to provide data to determine if the intervention resulted in significant changes in stair use/climbing. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The search results yielded 2,136 articles in total; 54 articles met the criteria, which resulted in a final sample of 67 studies included in the analyses. Interventions settings included public sites (75%), worksites (21%), or a combination of both (4%). For Phase 1 results, 72% of studies reported significant improvements in stair use (n=10 of 14) and stair climbing (n=38 of 53).
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from the review demonstrates support for the effectiveness of interventions to increase stair use and stair climbing. Although evidence supports the effectiveness of stair interventions in public settings, less support is provided for worksites.
Copyright © 2016 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27720340     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  2 in total

1.  Environmental Physical Activity Cues and Children's Active vs. Sedentary Recreation.

Authors:  Amanda N Spitzer; Katrina Oselinsky; Rachel G Lucas-Thompson; Dan J Graham
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Does source credibility matter for point-of-decision prompts? A quasi-experimental field study to increase stair use.

Authors:  Ivan P Lee; Richard M Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.