Peter James1, Jaime E Hart2, Rachel F Banay3, Francine Laden4, Lisa B Signorello5. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;. Electronic address: pjames@hsph.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Urban environments are associated with a higher risk of adverse mental health outcomes; however, it is unclear which specific components of the urban environment drive these associations. METHODS: Using data collected in 2002-2009 from 73,225 low-income, racially diverse individuals across the Southeastern U.S., analyses evaluated the cross-sectional relationship between a walkability index and depression. Walkability was calculated from population density, street connectivity, and destination count in the 1,200-meter area around participants' homes, and depression was measured using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for depression symptomatology and questionnaire responses regarding doctor-diagnosed depression and antidepressant use. Data were analyzed in 2015. RESULTS: Participants living in neighborhoods with the highest walkability index had 6% higher odds of moderate or greater depression symptoms (score ≥15, 95% CI=0.99, 1.14), 28% higher odds of doctor-diagnosed depression (95% CI=1.20, 1.36), and 16% higher odds of current antidepressant use (95% CI=1.08, 1.25), compared with those in the lowest walkability index. Higher walkability was associated with higher odds of depression symptoms in the most deprived neighborhoods only, whereas walkability was associated with lower odds of depression symptoms in the least deprived neighborhoods. CONCLUSIONS: Living in a more walkable neighborhood was associated with modestly higher levels of doctor-diagnosed depression and antidepressant use, and walkability was associated with greater depression symptoms in neighborhoods with higher deprivation. Although dense urban environments may provide opportunities for physical activity, they may also increase exposure to noise, air pollution, and social stressors that could increase levels of depression.
INTRODUCTION: Urban environments are associated with a higher risk of adverse mental health outcomes; however, it is unclear which specific components of the urban environment drive these associations. METHODS: Using data collected in 2002-2009 from 73,225 low-income, racially diverse individuals across the Southeastern U.S., analyses evaluated the cross-sectional relationship between a walkability index and depression. Walkability was calculated from population density, street connectivity, and destination count in the 1,200-meter area around participants' homes, and depression was measured using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for depression symptomatology and questionnaire responses regarding doctor-diagnosed depression and antidepressant use. Data were analyzed in 2015. RESULTS:Participants living in neighborhoods with the highest walkability index had 6% higher odds of moderate or greater depression symptoms (score ≥15, 95% CI=0.99, 1.14), 28% higher odds of doctor-diagnosed depression (95% CI=1.20, 1.36), and 16% higher odds of current antidepressant use (95% CI=1.08, 1.25), compared with those in the lowest walkability index. Higher walkability was associated with higher odds of depression symptoms in the most deprived neighborhoods only, whereas walkability was associated with lower odds of depression symptoms in the least deprived neighborhoods. CONCLUSIONS: Living in a more walkable neighborhood was associated with modestly higher levels of doctor-diagnosed depression and antidepressant use, and walkability was associated with greater depression symptoms in neighborhoods with higher deprivation. Although dense urban environments may provide opportunities for physical activity, they may also increase exposure to noise, air pollution, and social stressors that could increase levels of depression.
Authors: Mathias Basner; Wolfgang Babisch; Adrian Davis; Mark Brink; Charlotte Clark; Sabine Janssen; Stephen Stansfeld Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Yanique Redwood; Amy J Schulz; Barbara A Israel; Mieko Yoshihama; Caroline C Wang; Marshall Kreuter Journal: Fam Community Health Date: 2010 Jan-Mar
Authors: James F Sallis; Donald J Slymen; Terry L Conway; Lawrence D Frank; Brian E Saelens; Kelli Cain; James E Chapman Journal: Health Place Date: 2011-03-09 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Peter James; David Berrigan; Jaime E Hart; J Aaron Hipp; Christine M Hoehner; Jacqueline Kerr; Jacqueline M Major; Masayoshi Oka; Francine Laden Journal: Health Place Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Jennifer S Sonderman; Michael T Mumma; Sarah S Cohen; Elizabeth L Cope; William J Blot; Lisa B Signorello Journal: Geospat Health Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 1.212
Authors: Joseph L Servadio; Abiola S Lawal; Tate Davis; Josephine Bates; Armistead G Russell; Anu Ramaswami; Matteo Convertino; Nisha Botchwey Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Halyna Lugova; Jo Ann Andoy-Galvan; Sapna S Patil; Yin How Wong; Gul M Baloch; Adlina Suleiman; Rusli Nordin; Karuthan Chinna Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2021-01-08
Authors: Jessica Schoner; Jim Chapman; Eric H Fox; Nicole Iroz-Elardo; Allen Brookes; Kara E MacLeod; Lawrence D Frank Journal: J Transp Health Date: 2018-09
Authors: Harold H Lee; Sakurako S Okuzono; Eric S Kim; Immaculata De Vivo; Laura M Raffield; LáShauntá Glover; Mario Sims; Francine Grodstein; Laura D Kubzansky Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2020-12-29 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Bina Ram; Aparna Shankar; Claire M Nightingale; Billie Giles-Corti; Anne Ellaway; Ashley R Cooper; Angie Page; Steven Cummins; Daniel Lewis; Peter H Whincup; Derek G Cook; Alicja R Rudnicka; Christopher G Owen Journal: Health Place Date: 2017-09-23 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Darren J Mayne; Geoffrey G Morgan; Bin B Jalaludin; Adrian E Bauman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Stephanie L Orstad; Kristin Szuhany; Kosuke Tamura; Lorna E Thorpe; Melanie Jay Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Christopher E Anderson; Stephanie T Broyles; Maeve E Wallace; Lydia A Bazzano; Jeanette Gustat Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 2.830