Literature DB >> 27720089

The Usefulness of the APACHE II Score in Obstetric Critical Care: A Structured Review.

Helen M Ryan1, Sumedha Sharma2, Laura A Magee3, J Mark Ansermino4, Karen MacDonell5, Beth A Payne2, Keith R Walley6, Peter von Dadelszen7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) mortality prediction model in pregnant and recently pregnant women receiving critical care in low-, middle-, and high-income countries during the study period (1985-2015), using a structured literature review. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, searched for articles published between 1985 and 2015. STUDY SELECTION: Twenty-five studies (24 publications), of which two were prospective, were included in the analyses. Ten studies were from high-income countries (HICs), and 15 were from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Median study duration and size were six years and 124 women, respectively. DATA SYNTHESIS: ICU admission complicates 0.48% of deliveries, and pregnant and recently pregnant women account for 1.49% of ICU admissions. One quarter were admitted while pregnant, three quarters of these for an obstetric indication and for a median of three days. The median APACHE II score was 10.9, with a median APACHE II-predicted mortality of 16.6%. Observed mortality was 4.6%, and the median standardized mortality ratio was 0.36 (interquartile range 0.23 to 0.73). The standardized mortality ratio was < 0.9 in 24 of 25 studies. Women in HICs were more frequently admitted with a medical comorbidity but were less likely to die than were women in LMICs.
CONCLUSION: The APACHE II score consistently overestimates mortality risks for pregnant and recently pregnant women receiving critical care, whether they reside in HICs or LMICs. There is a need for a pregnancy-specific outcome prediction model for these women.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; critical care; maternal mortality; pregnancy; structured review

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27720089     DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  7 in total

1.  Prognosticating Fetomaternal ICU Outcomes.

Authors:  Jyotsna Suri; Zeba Khanam
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-12

2.  The early predictive value of routine laboratory tests on the severity of acute pancreatitis patients in pregnancy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Di Jin; Jixue Tan; Jingsun Jiang; Dana Philips; Ling Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Risk prediction models for maternal mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Aoyama; Rohan D'Souza; Ruxandra Pinto; Joel G Ray; Andrea Hill; Damon C Scales; Stephen E Lapinsky; Gareth R Seaward; Michelle Hladunewich; Prakesh S Shah; Robert A Fowler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Validation of APACHE II, APACHE III and SAPS II scores in in-hospital and one year mortality prediction in a mixed intensive care unit in Poland: a cohort study.

Authors:  Szymon Czajka; Katarzyna Ziębińska; Konstanty Marczenko; Barbara Posmyk; Anna J Szczepańska; Łukasz J Krzych
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Establishment and Effectiveness Evaluation of a Scoring System-RAAS (RDW, AGE, APACHE II, SOFA) for Sepsis by a Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Yingying Huang; Shaowei Jiang; Wenjie Li; Yiwen Fan; Yuxin Leng; Chengjin Gao
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2022-01-20

6.  Women of reproductive age in a tertiary intensive care unit: indications, outcome and the impact of pregnancy-a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Karishma P Ramlakhan; Diederik Gommers; Carmen E R M Jacobs; Khaoula Makouri; Johannes J Duvekot; Irwin K M Reiss; Arie Franx; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Jérôme M J Cornette
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Development and internal validation of the multivariable CIPHER (Collaborative Integrated Pregnancy High-dependency Estimate of Risk) clinical risk prediction model.

Authors:  Beth A Payne; Helen Ryan; Jeffrey Bone; Laura A Magee; Alice B Aarvold; J Mark Ansermino; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Mary Bowen; J Guilherme Cecatti; Cynthia Chazotte; Tim Crozier; Anne-Cornélie J M de Pont; Oktay Demirkiran; Tao Duan; Marlot Kallen; Wessel Ganzevoort; Michael Geary; Dena Goffman; Jennifer A Hutcheon; K S Joseph; Stephen E Lapinsky; Isam Lataifeh; Jing Li; Sarka Liskonova; Emily M Hamel; Fionnuala M McAuliffe; Colm O'Herlihy; Ben W J Mol; P Gareth R Seaward; Ramzy Tadros; Turkan Togal; Rahat Qureshi; U Vivian Ukah; Daniela Vasquez; Euan Wallace; Paul Yong; Vivian Zhou; Keith R Walley; Peter von Dadelszen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.