| Literature DB >> 27720020 |
Isabelle Meyts1, Barbara Bosch2, Alexandre Bolze3, Bertrand Boisson4, Yuval Itan5, Aziz Belkadi6, Vincent Pedergnana7, Leen Moens8, Capucine Picard9, Aurélie Cobat6, Xavier Bossuyt8, Laurent Abel4, Jean-Laurent Casanova10.
Abstract
The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 2010 has transformed medicine, particularly the growing field of inborn errors of immunity. NGS has facilitated the discovery of novel disease-causing genes and the genetic diagnosis of patients with monogenic inborn errors of immunity. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is presently the most cost-effective approach for research and diagnostics, although whole-genome sequencing offers several advantages. The scientific or diagnostic challenge consists in selecting 1 or 2 candidate variants among thousands of NGS calls. Variant- and gene-level computational methods, as well as immunologic hypotheses, can help narrow down this genome-wide search. The key to success is a well-informed genetic hypothesis on 3 key aspects: mode of inheritance, clinical penetrance, and genetic heterogeneity of the condition. This determines the search strategy and selection criteria for candidate alleles. Subsequent functional validation of the disease-causing effect of the candidate variant is critical. Even the most up-to-date dry lab cannot clinch this validation without a seasoned wet lab. The multifariousness of variations entails an experimental rigor even greater than traditional Sanger sequencing-based approaches in order not to assign a condition to an irrelevant variant. Finding the needle in the haystack takes patience, prudence, and discernment.Entities:
Keywords: Next-generation sequencing; primary immunodeficiency; targeted sequencing; whole-exome sequencing; whole-genome sequencing
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27720020 PMCID: PMC5074686 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.08.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol ISSN: 0091-6749 Impact factor: 10.793