Literature DB >> 27718637

New levothyroxine formulation meeting 95-105% specification over the whole shelf-life: results from two pharmacokinetic trials.

Ulrike Gottwald-Hostalek1, Wolfgang Uhl2, Peter Wolna1, George J Kahaly3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Small levothyroxine (L-T4) dose changes can lead to significant clinical effects. To ensure thyroid hormone levels are safely maintained, authorities are increasingly adopting stricter potency specifications for L-T4, the most stringent of these being 95-105% of the labeled dose over the whole shelf-life. Levothyroxine sodium (Euthyrox, Eutirox, Lévothyrox ) has been reformulated, and two studies performed, to ensure bioequivalence to the currently marketed formulation and dosage form proportionality of the new formulation.
METHODS: The bioequivalence study was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence crossover comparing the highest dosage strengths of the currently marketed and the new L-T4 formulation at a total dose of 600 μg. The dosage form proportionality study was an open-label, randomized, three-period, six-sequence crossover, comparing 50 μg, 100 μg, and 200 μg L-T4 tablets, at a total dose of 600 μg. Blood samples were taken at predefined time intervals. Primary outcomes were area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) of thyroxine (T4) in plasma.
RESULTS: In the bioequivalence study, comparing the T4 profiles for the new and current formulation of L-T4, the geometric least square mean ratio of the baseline-adjusted AUC0-72,adj was 99.3% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 95.6-103.2) and the Cmax,adj was 101.7% (90% CI: 98.8-104.6). Bioequivalence was established if the 90% CI lay within the predefined 0.9-1.11 limits. In the dosage form proportionality study, pairwise comparisons ranged from 99.3% to 104.8%, and all 95% CIs were within the predefined CI range (0.8-1.25): the three dose strengths were dosage form proportional.
CONCLUSIONS: The new formulation of L-T4 meets the most stringent potency specification guidelines, and has been demonstrated to be bioequivalent to the current formulation and to show dosage form proportionality. The new formulation will enable patients to receive a dose fine tuned to their medical needs, contributing to improved safety in the use of L-T4.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioequivalence; dosage form proportionality; levothyroxine; pharmacokinetic trials; specification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27718637     DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1246434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  10 in total

1.  Comment on: "Why Were More Than 200 Subjects Required to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of a New Formulation of Levothyroxine with an Old One?"

Authors:  Patrick Nicolas
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  European Thyroid Association (ETA) and Thyroid Federation International (TFI) Joint Position Statement on the Interchangeability of Levothyroxine Products in EU Countries.

Authors:  Eric Fliers; Barbara Demeneix; Ashok Bhaseen; Thomas H Brix
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2018-09-28

3.  Authors' Reply to Lechat et al.: "Levothyrox® New and Old Formulations: Are they Switchable for Millions of Patients?"

Authors:  Didier Concordet; Peggy Gandia; Jean-Louis Montastruc; Alain Bousquet-Mélou; Peter Lees; Aude A Ferran; Pierre-Louis Toutain
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Authors' Reply to Nicolas: "Why Were More than 200 Subjects Required to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of a New Formulation of Levothyroxine with an Old One?"

Authors:  Didier Concordet; Peggy Gandia; Jean-Louis Montastruc; Alain Bousquet-Mélou; Peter Lees; Aude A Ferran; Pierre-Louis Toutain
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Levothyroxine Formulations: Pharmacological and Clinical Implications of Generic Substitution.

Authors:  Salvatore Benvenga; Allan Carlé
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Comment on: "Why Were More Than 200 Subjects Required to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of a New Formulation of Levothyroxine with an Old One?"

Authors:  Axel Krebs-Brown; Alain Munafo; Sumedh Gaikwad; Bogumila Urgatz; Claire Castello-Bridoux
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Authors' Reply to Krebs-Brown et al. Comment on: "Why Were More Than 200 Subjects Required to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of a New Formulation of Levothyroxine with an Old One?"

Authors:  D Concordet; P Gandia; J L Montastruc; A Bousquet-Mélou; P Lees; A A Ferran; P L Toutain
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Why Were More Than 200 Subjects Required to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of a New Formulation of Levothyroxine with an Old One?

Authors:  Didier Concordet; Peggy Gandia; Jean-Louis Montastruc; Alain Bousquet-Mélou; Peter Lees; Aude A Ferran; Pierre-Louis Toutain
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Authors' Reply to Yu et al.: "Levothyrox® New and Old Formulations: Are They Switchable for Millions of Patients?"

Authors:  Didier Concordet; Peggy Gandia; Jean-Louis Montastruc; Alain Bousquet-Mélou; Peter Lees; Aude A Ferran; Pierre-Louis Toutain
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Identification of Primary Medication Concerns Regarding Thyroid Hormone Replacement Therapy From Online Patient Medication Reviews: Text Mining of Social Network Data.

Authors:  So Hyun Park; Song Hee Hong
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.