Literature DB >> 27718500

Patients with lichen sclerosus experience moderate satisfaction with treatment and impairment of quality of life: results of a cross-sectional study.

O D van Cranenburgh1,2, S B W Nijland1, R Lindeboom3, J de Korte1,2, M A de Rie2,4, J A Ter Stege1, C A C Prinsen2,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although they are considered relevant, little is known about satisfaction with treatment and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients with lichen sclerosus (LS).
OBJECTIVES: In a cross-sectional study, we aimed to examine (i) satisfaction with treatment, (ii) patient characteristics associated with satisfaction and (iii) HRQoL in Dutch patients with LS.
METHODS: Members of the Dutch LS Patient Association (n = 750) were invited to complete a web-based survey. We measured satisfaction with treatment with a study-specific questionnaire, and HRQoL with the Skindex-29. We calculated domain scores for symptoms, emotions and functioning, and categorized scores into little, mildly, moderately or severely impaired HRQoL. We used a multiple linear regression analysis to examine whether patient characteristics were associated with treatment satisfaction.
RESULTS: In total 303 patients (40·4%) were included. Patients under current treatment (n = 265, 87·5%) were moderately satisfied with their treatment. Patients rated 'treatment effectiveness' as most important, although 58 (22%) were dissatisfied with the effectiveness of their current treatment. More impairment on the HRQoL emotions domain and a higher degree of disease severity were both associated with lower satisfaction with treatment and explained in total 13·5% of the variance in treatment satisfaction. On all HRQoL domains, one-third of the patients (range 34·7-38·9%) reported severe impairment.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LS are moderately satisfied with their treatment, and one-third of patients experience severe impairment of HRQoL. To improve dermatological care, we recommend enhancement of doctor-patient communication, information provision and organization, which may be more amenable to change than treatment effectiveness or safety.
© 2016 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27718500     DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Lichen sclerosus in children].

Authors:  M Promm; W H Rösch; G Kirtschig
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Thyroid Autoimmunity and Lichen.

Authors:  Fabrizio Guarneri; Roberta Giuffrida; Flavia Di Bari; Serafinella Patrizia Cannavò; Salvatore Benvenga
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.555

3.  Lichen sclerosus: the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of the disease and its possible transformation into carcinoma.

Authors:  Gianni Paulis; Enzo Berardesca
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2019-08-20

Review 4.  The impact of genital lichen sclerosus and lichen planus on quality of life: A review.

Authors:  Alison Ranum; David R Pearson
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2022-08-18

5.  Burden of treatment in vulval lichen sclerosus.

Authors:  Ciara O'Grady; Cathal O'Connor; Aysha Al Moosa; Michelle Murphy; Eilis Nic Dhonncha
Journal:  Skin Health Dis       Date:  2022-05-16

6.  The impact of an encounter with a gynaecologic dermatologist on quality of life, health literacy and education satisfaction for patients with vulvar lichen sclerosus: A survey study.

Authors:  E M Kolitz; J Pineider; M M Mauskar; A Rutherford
Journal:  Skin Health Dis       Date:  2021-12-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.