Jérémie H Lefèvre1,2, Jeanne Reboul-Marty3, Sophie de Vaugrigneuse4, Jean-David Zeitoun5,6. 1. Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP, Paris, France. 2. University Paris VI, Paris, France. 3. Department of Medical Information, CH de Marne la Vallée, Jossigny, France. 4. Sciences Po, Paris, France. 5. Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP, 284, rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France. jdzeitoun@yahoo.fr. 6. Department of Proctology, Croix Saint-Simon Hospital, Paris, France. jdzeitoun@yahoo.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical readmissions have been extensively studied in North America, but very few data from other countries are available. We aimed to describe surgical readmissions in France and to assess their association with hospital status, surgical volume, and day surgery activity. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study encompassing all 1270 French hospitals, except for military hospitals and hospitals with very small volume. Data were retrieved from the national database regarding all patients undergoing surgery between January 1, 2010 and November 30, 2010. The main outcome measure was 30-day readmission rate. Association with hospital status, surgical volume, and the level of day surgery were assessed. Risk adjustment was performed based upon administrative categories. RESULTS: After exclusion of deaths and hospital transfers, there were 1,686,602 patients in the study cohort. Thirty-day readmission rate was 5.9 %. Distribution was skewed, with 21.5 % of procedures accounting for 33.5 % of all 30-day readmissions. Early readmissions (≤3 days) were associated with higher mortality as compared to those occurring later (>7 days) (3.2 vs. 2.6 %; p < 0.0001). After multivariate analysis, University hospitals were shown to be affected by a significantly greater risk of 30-day readmission as compared to private hospitals (odds ratio 1.46 [95 % CI 1.42-1.5]). Other independent factors were as follows: male gender, longer initial hospital stay, and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical 30-day readmission rate was low, with early readmissions being associated with higher mortality. Conversely to prior research, University hospitals were shown to be associated with significantly higher risk of 30-day readmissions, even after risk adjustment.
BACKGROUND: Surgical readmissions have been extensively studied in North America, but very few data from other countries are available. We aimed to describe surgical readmissions in France and to assess their association with hospital status, surgical volume, and day surgery activity. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study encompassing all 1270 French hospitals, except for military hospitals and hospitals with very small volume. Data were retrieved from the national database regarding all patients undergoing surgery between January 1, 2010 and November 30, 2010. The main outcome measure was 30-day readmission rate. Association with hospital status, surgical volume, and the level of day surgery were assessed. Risk adjustment was performed based upon administrative categories. RESULTS: After exclusion of deaths and hospital transfers, there were 1,686,602 patients in the study cohort. Thirty-day readmission rate was 5.9 %. Distribution was skewed, with 21.5 % of procedures accounting for 33.5 % of all 30-day readmissions. Early readmissions (≤3 days) were associated with higher mortality as compared to those occurring later (>7 days) (3.2 vs. 2.6 %; p < 0.0001). After multivariate analysis, University hospitals were shown to be affected by a significantly greater risk of 30-day readmission as compared to private hospitals (odds ratio 1.46 [95 % CI 1.42-1.5]). Other independent factors were as follows: male gender, longer initial hospital stay, and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical 30-day readmission rate was low, with early readmissions being associated with higher mortality. Conversely to prior research, University hospitals were shown to be associated with significantly higher risk of 30-day readmissions, even after risk adjustment.
Authors: J Guerra; E Luciolli; A Felce; B Ghersi; F Guilmineau; M C Rousseau; B Soudrie; A Urtizberea; J Holstein Journal: Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 1.019
Authors: Adrian F Hernandez; Melissa A Greiner; Gregg C Fonarow; Bradley G Hammill; Paul A Heidenreich; Clyde W Yancy; Eric D Peterson; Lesley H Curtis Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-05-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Laurent G Glance; Arthur L Kellermann; Turner M Osler; Yue Li; Dana B Mukamel; Stewart J Lustik; Michael P Eaton; Andrew W Dick Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Leora I Horwitz; Zhenqiu Lin; Jeph Herrin; Susannah Bernheim; Elizabeth E Drye; Harlan M Krumholz; Harold J Hines; Joseph S Ross Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-02-09