| Literature DB >> 27717758 |
Guilherme Klafke1, Anelise Webster2, Bruno Dall Agnol2, Endrigo Pradel2, Jeniffer Silva2, Luiz Henrique de La Canal2, Marcelo Becker2, Mateus Felipe Osório2, Melanie Mansson2, Rafael Barreto2, Ramon Scheffer2, Ugo Araújo Souza2, Vivian Bamberg Corassini2, Julsan Dos Santos2, José Reck2, João Ricardo Martins2.
Abstract
Acaricide resistance is a major obstacle to the control of Rhipicephalus microplus. Historically, the indiscriminate use of chemical compounds has contributed to the selection of populations resistant to different classes of acaricides. Therefore, multiple acaricide resistance is an important threat to the chemical control of the cattle tick. To investigate the occurrence and extent of multiple resistance to acaricides in Southern Brazil we performed larval tests with cypermethrin, chlorpyriphos, amitraz, fipronil and ivermectin on 104 cattle tick field samples from different ranches in Rio Grande do Sul, between the years 2013 and 2015. Adult immersion tests with a commercial formulation mixture of chlorpyriphos and cypermethrin were performed on 75 samples. Four levels of resistance were established according to the mortality of larvae: Level I: mortality between 82% and 95%; Level II: mortality between 57% and 82%; Level III: mortality between 25% and 57%; and Level IV: mortality lower than 25%. Resistance to cypermethrin was detected in 98.08% of the samples evaluated, mostly at resistance level IV. The frequency of samples resistant to amitraz, chlorpyriphos, ivermectin and fipronil was 76.92%, 60.58%, 60.58% and 53.85% respectively. Multiple resistance to three or more compounds was found in 78.85% of the samples. The results obtained in this study are alarming and reveal a new scenario for the challenge of tick control using chemicals. This is an issue of high importance to cattle production systems where this tick is responsible for a high economic impact. Copyright ÂEntities:
Keywords: Acaricides; Brazil; Control; Multiple resistance; Rhipicephalus microplus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27717758 DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.09.019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ticks Tick Borne Dis ISSN: 1877-959X Impact factor: 3.744