Literature DB >> 27717538

Non-invasive assessment of low- and intermediate-risk patients with chest pain.

Pelbreton C Balfour1, Jorge A Gonzalez1, Christopher M Kramer2.   

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a significant global public health burden despite advancements in prevention and therapeutic strategies. Common non-invasive imaging modalities, anatomic and functional, are available for the assessment of patients with stable chest pain. Exercise electrocardiography is a long-standing method for evaluation for CAD and remains the initial test for the majority of patients who can exercise adequately with a baseline interpretable electrocardiogram. The addition of cardiac imaging to exercise testing provides incremental benefit for accurate diagnosis for CAD and is particularly useful in patients who are unable to exercise adequately and/or have uninterpretable electrocardiograms. Radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging and echocardiography with exercise or pharmacological stress provide high sensitivity and specificity in the detection and further risk stratification of patients with CAD. Recently, coronary computed tomography angiography has demonstrated its growing role to rule out significant CAD given its high negative predictive value. Although less available, stress cardiac magnetic resonance provides a comprehensive assessment of cardiac structure and function and provides a high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of CAD. The utilization of non-invasive testing is complex due to various advantages and limitations, particularly in the assessment of low- and intermediate-risk patients with chest pain, where no single study is suitable for all patients. This review will describe currently available non-invasive modalities, along with current evidence-based guidelines and appropriate use criteria in the assessment of low- and intermediate-risk patients with suspected, stable CAD.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Coronary artery disease; Coronary computed tomography angiography; Exercise electrocardiography; Non-invasive imaging; Radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging; Risk stratification; Stress echocardiography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27717538      PMCID: PMC5346457          DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2016.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med        ISSN: 1050-1738            Impact factor:   6.677


  53 in total

1.  Medicare services provided by cardiologists in the United States: 1999-2008.

Authors:  Bruce W Andrus; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-01-10

Review 2.  Comprehensive plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Maros Ferencik; Szilard Voros; Béla Merkely; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Yield of downstream tests after exercise treadmill testing: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mitalee P Christman; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Edward Hulten; Ekta Saksena; Jon Hainer; Hicham Skali; Raymond Y Kwong; Daniel E Forman; Sharmila Dorbala; Patrick T O'Gara; Marcelo F Di Carli; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Trends in noninvasive testing for coronary artery disease: less exercise, less information.

Authors:  S Michael Gharacholou; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Prognostic implications of stress modality on mortality risk and cause of death in patients undergoing office-based SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Marie-France Poulin; Sarah Alexander; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria Acute Nonspecific Chest Pain-Low Probability of Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Udo Hoffmann; Scott R Akers; Richard K J Brown; Kristopher W Cummings; Ricardo C Cury; S Bruce Greenberg; Vincent B Ho; Joe Y Hsu; James K Min; Kalpesh K Panchal; Arthur E Stillman; Pamela K Woodard; Jill E Jacobs
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  D B Mark; L Shaw; F E Harrell; M A Hlatky; K L Lee; J R Bengtson; C B McCants; R M Califf; D B Pryor
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Asystole following regadenoson infusion in stable outpatients.

Authors:  Jeffrey Rosenblatt; Deirdre Mooney; Timothy Dunn; Mylan Cohen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Physician decision making and trends in the use of cardiac stress testing in the United States: an analysis of repeated cross-sectional data.

Authors:  Joseph A Ladapo; Saul Blecker; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Lipinski; Courtney M McVey; Jeffrey S Berger; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  7 in total

1.  Prognostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging in octogenarians.

Authors:  Francesco Nudi; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Orazio Schillaci; Natale di Belardino; Francesco Versaci; Alessandro Nudi; Annamaria Pinto; Giandomenico Neri; Enrica Procaccini; Giacomo Frati; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Myocardial strain analysis as a non-invasive screening test in the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Nehzat Akiash; Mohammad Mohammadi; Hoda Mombeini; Akbar Nikpajouh
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2021-05-25

3.  The validity and applicability of CAD-RADS in the management of patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha; Sameh Abdelaziz Aly; Ahmad Abdel Azim Ismail; Hanan A Bahaaeldin; Samar Mohamad Shehata
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-12-04

4.  Use of artificial intelligence to assess the risk of coronary artery disease without additional (non-invasive) testing: validation in a low-risk to intermediate-risk outpatient clinic cohort.

Authors:  Casper G M J Eurlings; Sema Bektas; Sandra Sanders-van Wijk; Andrew Tsirkin; Vasily Vasilchenko; Steven J R Meex; Michael Failer; Caroline Oehri; Peter Ruff; Michael J Zellweger; Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Prediction of disorders with significant coronary lesions using machine learning in patients admitted with chest symptom.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Jae Hoon Lee; Yuri Choi; YunKyong Hyon; Yong Hwan Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Inter-observer agreement of the Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADSTM) in patients with stable chest pain.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Mohamed Magdy Elrakhawy; Mahmoud Mohamed Yossof; Hadeer Mohamed Nageb
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-16

7.  Soluble LOX-1: A Novel Biomarker in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease, Stroke, and Acute Aortic Dissection?

Authors:  Anja Hofmann; Coy Brunssen; Steffen Wolk; Christian Reeps; Henning Morawietz
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 5.501

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.