Literature DB >> 27717198

Young investigator challenge: Can the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 be used for next-generation sequencing of thyroid FNA samples?

Claudio Bellevicine1, Roberta Sgariglia1, Umberto Malapelle1, Elena Vigliar1, Mariantonia Nacchio1, Giuseppe Ciancia2, Markus Eszlinger3, Ralf Paschke4,3, Giancarlo Troncone1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is accurate and cost-effective in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Molecular techniques may contribute to risk stratification in indeterminate cases. Although next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a promising technique for the molecular testing of thyroid FNA specimens, thyroid-specific cancer gene panels are not commercially available. Conversely, the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 (CHPv2), which includes the genes most frequently mutated in thyroid neoplasms, is commercially available and may represent an alternative to thyroid-specific panels. To the authors' knowledge to date, CHPv2 has performed well only on "ideal" cytological samples featuring abundant, high-quality DNA and satisfactory postsequencing metrics. The objective of the current study was to extend NGS to less-than-ideal samples, which represent a large percentage of routine clinical specimens.
METHODS: A total of 37 thyroid smears were retrospectively analyzed using CHPv2, regardless of any preanalytical and postsequencing metric thresholds. Specifically, the authors evaluated the performance of CHPv2 on the BRAF, NRAS, HRAS, KRAS, and RET genes. Results were verified by pyrosequencing.
RESULTS: Of the 37 thyroid FNA specimens, 34 (91.8%) were successfully processed. BRAF, NRAS, and RET somatic variants were detected in 22 of these 34 specimens (64.7%). NGS was found to have a high sensitivity (89.4%), specificity (85.7%), and accuracy (88.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: CHPv2 is a valid option for the molecular evaluation of thyroid FNA specimens by NGS. It is interesting to note that this approach is accurate and effective even when applied to routine cytology samples that usually do not have optimal preanalytical and postsequencing requirements. Cancer Cytopathol 2016;124:776-84.
© 2016 American Cancer Society. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ion Torrent; limited samples; molecular diagnosis; next-generation sequencing; postsequencing metrics; preanalytical factors; thyroid cancer; thyroid fine-needle aspiration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27717198     DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol        ISSN: 1934-662X            Impact factor:   5.284


  4 in total

1.  Next generation sequencing identifies novel potential actionable mutations for grade I meningioma treatment.

Authors:  Francesco Pepe; Pasquale Pisapia; Maria Laura Del Basso de Caro; Floriana Conticelli; Umberto Malapelle; Giancarlo Troncone; Juan Carlos Martinez
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 2.  BRAF: A Two-Faced Janus.

Authors:  Pasquale Pisapia; Francesco Pepe; Antonino Iaccarino; Roberta Sgariglia; Mariantonia Nacchio; Gianluca Russo; Gianluca Gragnano; Umberto Malapelle; Giancarlo Troncone
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Reliable Detection of Somatic Mutations for Pancreatic Cancer in Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspirates with Next-Generation Sequencing: Implications from a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Joseph R Habib; Yayun Zhu; Lingdi Yin; Ammar A Javed; Ding Ding; Jonathan Tenior; Michael Wright; Syed Z Ali; Richard A Burkhart; William Burns; Christopher L Wolfgang; Eunji Shin; Jun Yu; Jin He
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Next generation sequencing in cytology.

Authors:  Pasquale Pisapia; Francesco Pepe; Roberta Sgariglia; Mariantonia Nacchio; Gianluca Russo; Floriana Conticelli; Ilaria Girolami; Albino Eccher; Claudio Bellevicine; Elena Vigliar; Umberto Malapelle; Giancarlo Troncone
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.073

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.