Literature DB >> 27717025

Determining donor-specific antibody C1q-binding ability improves the prediction of antibody-mediated rejection in human leucocyte antigen-incompatible kidney transplantation.

Jorge Malheiro1,2, Sandra Tafulo3, Leonídio Dias1, La Salete Martins1,2, Isabel Fonseca1,2, Idalina Beirão1,2, António Castro-Henriques1,2, António Cabrita1.   

Abstract

Detrimental impact of preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) against human leucocyte antigens on outcomes after kidney transplantation are well documented, however, the value of their capacity to bind complement for predicting antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and graft survival still needs to be confirmed. We aimed to study DSA characteristics (strength and C1q binding) that might distinguish harmful DSA from clinically irrelevant ones. We retrospectively studied 60 kidney-transplanted patients with preformed DSA detected by single antigen bead (SAB) assays (IgG and C1q kits), from a cohort of 517 kidney graft recipients (124 with detectable anti-HLA antibodies). Patients were divided into DSA strength (MFI < vs. ≥ 15 000) and C1q-binding ability. AMR frequency was high (30%) and it increased with DSA strength (P = 0.002) and C1q+ DSA (P < 0.001). The performance of DSA C1q-binding ability as a predictor of AMR was better than DSA strength (diagnostic odds ratio 16.3 vs. 6.4, respectively). Furthermore, a multivariable logistic regression showed that C1q+ DSA was a risk factor for AMR (OR = 16.80, P = 0.001), while high MFI DSAs were not. Graft survival was lower in high MFI C1q+ DSA in comparison with patients with C1q- high or low MFI DSA (at 6 years, 38%, 83% and 80%, respectively; P = 0.001). Both DSA strength and C1q-binding ability assessment seem valuable for improving pretransplant risk assessment. Since DSA C1q-binding ability was a better predictor of AMR and correlated with graft survival, C1q-SAB may be a particularly useful tool.
© 2016 Steunstichting ESOT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C1q-binding antibodies; antibody-mediated rejection; donor-specific antibodies; kidney transplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27717025     DOI: 10.1111/tri.12873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  11 in total

Review 1.  Donor-Specific Antibodies in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Rubin Zhang
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Complement-activating donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and solid organ transplant survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antoine Bouquegneau; Charlotte Loheac; Olivier Aubert; Yassine Bouatou; Denis Viglietti; Jean-Philippe Empana; Camilo Ulloa; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Christophe Legendre; Denis Glotz; Annette M Jackson; Adriana Zeevi; Stephan Schaub; Jean-Luc Taupin; Elaine F Reed; John J Friedewald; Dolly B Tyan; Caner Süsal; Ron Shapiro; E Steve Woodle; Luis G Hidalgo; Jacqueline O'Leary; Robert A Montgomery; Jon Kobashigawa; Xavier Jouven; Patricia Jabre; Carmen Lefaucheur; Alexandre Loupy
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  Combining Sensitive Crossmatch Assays With Donor/Recipient Human Leukocyte Antigen Eplet Matching Predicts Living-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome.

Authors:  Maria Meneghini; Edoardo Melilli; Jaume Martorell; Ignacio Revuelta; Elisabet Rigol-Monzó; Anna Manonelles; Nuria Montero; David Cucchiari; Fritz Diekmann; Josep M Cruzado; Salvador Gil-Vernet; Josep M Grinyó; Oriol Bestard
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2018-03-30

Review 4.  Results and reflections from the PROfiling Consortium on Antibody Repertoire and Effector functions in kidney transplantation: A mini-review.

Authors:  Elena G Kamburova; Andries Hoitsma; Frans H Claas; Henny G Otten
Journal:  HLA       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.513

5.  Characterization of the C1q-Binding Ability and the IgG1-4 Subclass Profile of Preformed Anti-HLA Antibodies by Solid-Phase Assays.

Authors:  Ana Navas; Juan Molina; María-Luisa Agüera; Ipek Guler; Aurora Jurado; Alberto Rodríguez-Benot; Corona Alonso; Rafael Solana
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Transplant outcomes in positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity- versus flow cytometry-crossmatch kidney transplant recipients after successful desensitization: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Deok Gie Kim; Juhan Lee; Younhee Park; Myoung Soo Kim; Hyeon Joo Jeong; Soon Il Kim; Yu Seun Kim; Beom Seok Kim; Kyu Ha Huh
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  C3d-Positive Preformed DSAs Tend to Persist and Result in a Higher Risk of AMR after Kidney Transplants.

Authors:  Sooin Choi; Kyo Won Lee; Jae Berm Park; Kyunga Kim; Hye-Ryeon Jang; Wooseong Huh; Eun Suk Kang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 8.  Characteristics of Immunoglobulin M Type Antibodies of Different Origins from the Immunologic and Clinical Viewpoints and Their Application in Controlling Antibody-Mediated Allograft Rejection.

Authors:  Yoshiko Matsuda; Takahisa Hiramitsu; Xiao-Kang Li; Takeshi Watanabe
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-12-23

9.  Impact of Preformed Donor-Specific Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibody C1q-Binding Ability on Kidney Allograft Outcome.

Authors:  Juan Molina; Ana Navas; María-Luisa Agüera; Cristian Rodelo-Haad; Corona Alonso; Alberto Rodríguez-Benot; Pedro Aljama; Rafael Solana
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 10.  Application, technical issues, and interpretation of C1q for graft outcome.

Authors:  Dolly B Tyan
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.