Literature DB >> 27716716

Sepsis in heart transplant recipients: Is the new definition applicable?

Sarvesh Pal Singh1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27716716      PMCID: PMC5070345          DOI: 10.4103/0971-9784.191544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth        ISSN: 0971-9784


× No keyword cloud information.
The Editor, Heart transplant recipients are at increased risk of infection and sepsis because of immunosuppression. Recently, in the February issue of JAMA, a new definition of sepsis has been published, which defines sepsis as “life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infection.”[1] The immune system of heart transplant recipients, in the early postoperative period, is adapting to the new graft and immunosuppressant medications. It is neither completely suppressed nor active, a state which may be labeled as dysfunctional. Therefore, in the early postoperative period (<30 days) of heart transplant, it is only prudent to ignore the phrase “dysregulated host response” from the definition. The definition that remains is “life-threatening organ dysfunction due to infection” which actually holds true in the setting of a heart transplant. The dilemma although remains do any life-threatening organ dysfunction and the positive documentation of an infection equates to sepsis? One common organ dysfunction after heart transplant is acute kidney injury (AKI) which is associated with high mortality in dialysis-dependent patients.[23] As per current definition, an infection manifesting in a recipient who already has AKI may not be labeled as sepsis until the existing AKI worsens and becomes life threatening, or a new life-threatening organ dysfunction occurs. The aforesaid discussion points that “life threatening” is the key word, and the sequence of events is important. Heart transplant recipients follow a very steep downhill course once sepsis sets in and the duration between the evidence of infection and occurrence of sepsis may actually be very less. Therefore, it is prudent to recommend that “any organ dysfunction due to infection (life threatening or not)” should be managed as sepsis in heart transplant recipients.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  3 in total

1.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Risks and outcomes of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis after cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Janet M Boyle; Soundous Moualla; Susana Arrigain; Sarah Worley; Mohamed H Bakri; Randall C Starling; Robert Heyka; Charuhas V Thakar
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Acute renal failure early after heart transplantation: risk factors and clinical consequences.

Authors:  Einar Gude; Arne K Andreassen; Satish Arora; Lars Gullestad; Ingelin Grov; Anders Hartmann; Torbjørn Leivestad; Arnt E Fiane; Odd R Geiran; Mari Vardal; Svein Simonsen
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.863

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.