Literature DB >> 27716630

Evaluation of 3D printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP versus collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in a beagle implant model.

J-Y Won1, C-Y Park, J-H Bae, G Ahn, C Kim, D-H Lim, D-W Cho, W-S Yun, J-H Shim, J-B Huh.   

Abstract

Here, we compared 3D-printed polycaprolactone/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/β-tricalcium phosphate (PCL/PLGA/β-TCP) membranes with the widely used collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration (GBR) in beagle implant models. For mechanical property comparison in dry and wet conditions and cytocompatibility determination, we analyzed the rate and pattern of cell proliferation of seeded fibroblasts and preosteoblasts using the cell counting kit-8 assay and scanning electron microscopy. Osteogenic differentiation was verified using alizarin red S staining. At 8 weeks following implantation in vivo using beagle dogs, computed tomography and histological analyses were performed after sacrifice. Cell proliferation rates in vitro indicated that early cell attachment was higher in collagen than in PCL/PLGA/β-TCP membranes; however, the difference subsided by day 7. Similar outcomes were found for osteogenic differentiation, with approximately 2.5 times greater staining in collagen than PCL/PLGA/β-TCP, but without significant difference by day 14. In vivo, bone regeneration in the defect area, represented by new bone formation and bone-to-implant contact, paralleled those associated with collagen membranes. However, tensile testing revealed that whereas the PCL/PLGA/β-TCP membrane mechanical properties were conserved in both wet and dry states, the tensile property of collagen was reduced by 99% under wet conditions. Our results demonstrate in vitro and in vivo that PCL/PLGA/β-TCP membranes have similar levels of biocompatibility and bone regeneration as collagen membranes. In particular, considering that GBR is always applied to a wet environment (e.g. blood, saliva), we demonstrated that PCL/PLGA/β-TCP membranes maintained their form more reliably than collagen membranes in a wet setting, confirming their appropriateness as a GBR membrane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27716630     DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/11/5/055013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1748-6041            Impact factor:   3.715


  14 in total

1.  Innovations in Craniofacial Bone and Periodontal Tissue Engineering - From Electrospinning to Converged Biofabrication.

Authors:  Zeynep Aytac; Nileshkumar Dubey; Arwa Daghrery; Jessica A Ferreira; Isaac J de Souza Araújo; Miguel Castilho; Jos Malda; Marco C Bottino
Journal:  Int Mater Rev       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 15.750

Review 2.  Advances in Barrier Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration Techniques.

Authors:  Ze Yang; Chang Wu; Huixin Shi; Xinyu Luo; Hui Sun; Qiang Wang; Dan Zhang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-22

3.  Expanding sacrificially printed microfluidic channel-embedded paper devices for construction of volumetric tissue models in vitro.

Authors:  Hongbin Li; Feng Cheng; Wanlu Li; Xia Cao; Zixuan Wang; Mian Wang; Juan Antonio Robledo-Lara; Junlong Liao; Carolina Chávez-Madero; Shabir Hassan; Jingwei Xie; Grissel Trujillo-de Santiago; Mario Moisés Álvarez; Jinmei He; Yu Shrike Zhang
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 9.954

4.  The fabrication of an ICA-SF/PLCL nanofibrous membrane by coaxial electrospinning and its effect on bone regeneration in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Lihua Yin; Kaijuan Wang; Xiaoqin Lv; Rui Sun; Shaohua Yang; Yujie Yang; Yanyun Liu; Jiatao Liu; Jing Zhou; Zhanhai Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effects of 3D-Printed Polycaprolactone/β-Tricalcium Phosphate Membranes on Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Jin-Hyung Shim; Joo-Yun Won; Jung-Hyung Park; Ji-Hyeon Bae; Geunseon Ahn; Chang-Hwan Kim; Dong-Hyuk Lim; Dong-Woo Cho; Won-Soo Yun; Eun-Bin Bae; Chang-Mo Jeong; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  The Effect of Bisphasic Calcium Phosphate Block Bone Graft Materials with Polysaccharides on Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Hyun-Sang Yoo; Ji-Hyeon Bae; Se-Eun Kim; Eun-Bin Bae; So-Yeun Kim; Kyung-Hee Choi; Keum-Ok Moon; Chang-Mo Jeong; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Comparative Efficacies of Collagen-Based 3D Printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP Composite Block Bone Grafts and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Kyoung-Sub Hwang; Jae-Won Choi; Jae-Hun Kim; Ho Yun Chung; Songwan Jin; Jin-Hyung Shim; Won-Soo Yun; Chang-Mo Jeong; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 8.  On the search of the ideal barrier membrane for guided bone regeneration.

Authors:  Jordi Caballé-Serrano; Antonio Munar-Frau; Octavi Ortiz-Puigpelat; David Soto-Penaloza; Miguel Peñarrocha; Federico Hernández-Alfaro
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-05-01

9.  Effectiveness of Surface Treatment with Amine Plasma for Improving the Biocompatibility of Maxillofacial Plates.

Authors:  Yeon-Woo Jeong; Seunggon Jung; Jeong Joon Han; Hong-Ju Park; Rok Young Kim; Byung-Hoon Kim; Min-Suk Kook
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Bone Augmentation of Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects Using Multilaminated Small Intestinal Submucosa as a Barrier Membrane: An Experimental Study in Dogs.

Authors:  Siwen Wang; Weiyi Wu; Yuhua Liu; Xinzhi Wang; Lin Tang; Pengyue You; Jianmin Han; Bowen Li; Yi Zhang; Mei Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.