Christine A Rabinak1, Shoko Mori2, Maryssa Lyons3, Mohammed R Milad4, K Luan Phan5. 1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States; Psychiatry & Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States; Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States; Translational Neuroscience Program, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Electronic address: rabinak@wayne.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; SUNY Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn, NY, United States. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States. 5. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Anatomy and Cell Biology and the Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Mental Health Service Line, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fear-based disorders, like social anxiety disorder (SAD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), are characterized by an exaggerated fear response and avoidance to trigger cues, suggesting a transdiagnostic mechanism of psychopathology. Current theories suggest that abnormalities in conditioned fear is a primary contributor to the pathophysiology of these disorders. The primary goal of this study was to compare acquisition of conditioned stimulus (CS) and aversive unconditioned stimulus (US) contingencies during fear learning and extinction in individuals with SAD and PTSD. METHODS: In a standard Pavlovian fear conditioning-extinction paradigm we measured subjective US expectancy ratings to different CSs in patients with SAD (n=16) compared to patients with PTSD (n=13) and healthy controls (n=15) RESULTS: Both patient groups (SAD, PTSD) acquired differential conditioning between a CS that predicted US (CS+) and a CS that never predicted the US (CS-), however, both groups reported an increased expectancy that the US would occur following the CS-. Additionally, the PTSD group overestimated that the US would occur in general. Neither patient group showed evidence of successful extinction of the CS+-US contingency nor differentiated their expectation of US occurrence between the CS+ and CS- during extinction learning. LIMITATIONS: Group sample sizes were small and we did not include a trauma-exposed group without PTSD CONCLUSIONS: Both SAD and PTSD generalize expectations of an aversive outcome across CSs, even when a CS never signals an aversive outcome and PTSD may tend to over-expect threat. Fear learning and extinction abnormalities may be a core feature underlying shared symptoms across fear-based disorders.
BACKGROUND: Fear-based disorders, like social anxiety disorder (SAD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), are characterized by an exaggerated fear response and avoidance to trigger cues, suggesting a transdiagnostic mechanism of psychopathology. Current theories suggest that abnormalities in conditioned fear is a primary contributor to the pathophysiology of these disorders. The primary goal of this study was to compare acquisition of conditioned stimulus (CS) and aversive unconditioned stimulus (US) contingencies during fear learning and extinction in individuals with SAD and PTSD. METHODS: In a standard Pavlovian fear conditioning-extinction paradigm we measured subjective US expectancy ratings to different CSs in patients with SAD (n=16) compared to patients with PTSD (n=13) and healthy controls (n=15) RESULTS: Both patient groups (SAD, PTSD) acquired differential conditioning between a CS that predicted US (CS+) and a CS that never predicted the US (CS-), however, both groups reported an increased expectancy that the US would occur following the CS-. Additionally, the PTSD group overestimated that the US would occur in general. Neither patient group showed evidence of successful extinction of the CS+-US contingency nor differentiated their expectation of US occurrence between the CS+ and CS- during extinction learning. LIMITATIONS: Group sample sizes were small and we did not include a trauma-exposed group without PTSD CONCLUSIONS: Both SAD and PTSD generalize expectations of an aversive outcome across CSs, even when a CS never signals an aversive outcome and PTSD may tend to over-expect threat. Fear learning and extinction abnormalities may be a core feature underlying shared symptoms across fear-based disorders.
Authors: R G Heimberg; K J Horner; H R Juster; S A Safren; E J Brown; F R Schneier; M R Liebowitz Journal: Psychol Med Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Nathaniel G Harnett; Edward W Ference; Kimberly H Wood; Muriah D Wheelock; Amy J Knight; David C Knight Journal: Cortex Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 4.027
Authors: Ali Ghobbeh; Rebecca J Taugher; Syed M Alam; Rong Fan; Ryan T LaLumiere; John A Wemmie Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: Lauren A M Lebois; Antonia V Seligowski; Jonathan D Wolff; Sarah B Hill; Kerry J Ressler Journal: Annu Rev Clin Psychol Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 18.561