| Literature DB >> 27716448 |
André Struglics1, Marcin Okroj2,3, Per Swärd4, Richard Frobell4, Tore Saxne5, L Stefan Lohmander4, Anna M Blom2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The complement system is suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA), and proinflammatory cytokines may play a role in OA development by inducing proteases. The association between complement factors, cytokines and OA has not been investigated. The aim of the present study was to explore the involvement of the complement system after knee trauma and in OA.Entities:
Keywords: Complement; Knee injury; Osteoarthritis; Synovial fluid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27716448 PMCID: PMC5052889 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-016-1123-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthritis Res Ther ISSN: 1478-6354 Impact factor: 5.156
Fig. 1A scheme of the complement system. Complement can be activated via three different routes. The classical and lectin pathways have their own specific pattern recognition molecules (PRMs), whereas the alternative pathway is activated by a spontaneous tick-over of C3 and deposition of C3b molecules onto permissive surfaces, which is facilitated by properdin (P). All pathways converge at the stage of C3 convertases, which catalyse breakdown of C3 into C3a and C3b molecules. When C3b molecules bind to the convertase complex, it gives rise to the C5 convertase. Except for the triggers indicated for each pathway in the scheme, apoptotic and necrotic cellular debris as well as degradative protein fragments from the extracellular matrix can also trigger all three pathways [4, 32]. In red and boldface type are the markers of complement activation analysed in our study: C4d, the end degradation product of C4b; C3bBbP, a soluble form of alternative C3 convertase including properdin; and sTCC, soluble terminal complement complex (a soluble form of C5b-9). Factor D Serine protease that cleaves factor B, Igs Immunoglobulins, MASP Mannose-binding lectin-associated serine protease, MBL Mannose-binding lectin
Characteristics of the study subjects
| Main diagnostic groups | Subgroups of injury | Duration, range (median) |
| Age in years, median (range) | Differences in age, |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference subjects | – | NA | 23 (22) | 26 (15–58) | – |
| Osteoarthritisa | – | 0–14.8 years (2.7) | 24 (42) | 64 (36–86) |
|
| Rheumatoid arthritisb | – | 0–43.0 years (10) | 32 (63) | 64 (32–83) |
|
| Pyrophosphate arthritis | – | 0–9.8 years (0.01) | 25 (40) | 75 (41–92) |
|
| Knee injuryc | – | 0–36.9 years (0.02) | 294 (27) | 29 (13–65) | 0.842 |
| Recent injury | 0–83 days (4) | 219 (25) | 26 (13–64) | 0.705 | |
| Recent injury, substratification | 0 days (0) | 35 (23) | 30 (14–47) | 0.991 | |
| 1 day (1) | 39 (21) | 24 (13–57) | 0.211 | ||
| 2–3 days (3) | 31 (29) | 26 (16–54) | 0.914 | ||
| 4–7 days (5) | 46 (28) | 25 (14–64) | 0.492 | ||
| 8–22 days (11) | 44 (30) | 23 (14–57) | 0.151 | ||
| 23–83 days (32) | 24 (13) | 38 (21–59) |
| ||
| Old injuryd | 1–36.9 years (3.3) | 75 (33) | 32 (18–65) | 0.090 | |
| Old injury, substratification | 1–3 years (2.0) | 35 (40) | 33 (18–61) | 0.149 | |
| 3.01–36.9 years (5.1) | 40 (28) | 30 (18–65) | 0.121 |
The injury groups are presented with stratification based on time between injury and synovial fluid aspiration. Differences in age between patients and reference groups were analysed using Student’s t test, and significant values (p < 0.05) are indicated by boldface type. Duration refers to time between injury or onset of disease and sampling. NA Not applicable
aSymptomatic and/or radiographically diagnosed idiopathic osteoarthritis (with no history of knee trauma), with information of disease duration from 17 of 24 patients. The OA score for the OA group was as follows: median = 7, range = 3–9 (information from 15 of 24 patients)
bRheumatoid arthritis, with information of disease duration from 29 of 32 patients, taking the following medications: no information (n = 1), no medication (n = 3), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and/or disease-modifying drugs (n = 28)
cThe clinical diagnosis of the subjects with knee injury was as follows: isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries (ACL n = 39, PCL n = 4), ACL injury with meniscal tear (n = 69), ACL injury with meniscal tear and other ligament injuries (n = 37), ACL injury with other ligament injuries (n = 47), isolated meniscal tear (n = 58), meniscal tear with other (not ACL) ligament injuries (n = 7), patellar dislocation with or without soft tissue injuries (n = 13), other types of injuries (medial or lateral collateral ligament tears n = 7, give-way n = 2), no signs of soft tissue injury (n = 10)
dSix patients in the old injury group had post-traumatic OA (based on OA score ≥5 [20]), and the group had the following OA score: median = 2, range = 1–8 (information from 63 of 75 patients)
Fig. 2Synovial fluid concentrations of C4d, C3bBbP and soluble terminal complement complex (sTCC). a Box plots with subjects ordered by the diagnostic groups: reference, osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), pyrophosphate arthritis (PPA), and knee injuries split into recent injury and old injury. b Knee injury samples ordered by days after injury in subgroups of 24–46 subjects (Table 1), showing recent injury and old injury groups. Boxes show the quartiles (median, 25th and 75th percentiles) with error bars and whiskers for the 10th and 90th percentiles. The quartiles of the reference group are extended as thin horizontal lines in both panels for comparison. Statistically significant group differences, determined by Mann-Whitney U test, versus the reference group are indicated by asterisks (*) and are presented in Additional file 1: Table S1. CAU Complement activation units
Correlation between C4d, C3bBbP and sTCC in reference and patient groups
| Reference ( | Osteoarthritis ( | Rheumatoid arthritis ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C4d | C3bBbP | C4d | C3bBbP | C4d | C3bBbP | |
| C3bBbP |
| – | 0.080 (0.710) | – |
| – |
| sTCC |
| 0.409 (0.053) |
| –0.298 (0.157) |
|
|
| Pyrophosphate arthritis ( | Knee injury ( | |||||
| C4d | C3bBbP | C4d | C3bBbP | |||
| C3bBbP | –0.085 (0.685) | – |
| – | ||
| sTCC |
| 0.345 (0.091) |
|
| ||
sTCC Soluble terminal complement complex
Correlation using Spearman’s rho (r s) between synovial fluid biomarkers of complement system analysed in different subject groups. Significant correlations (p < 0.05) are indicated by boldface type. The table shows r s with p values in brackets
Correlation between C4d, C3bBbP, sTCC and other biomarkers in the recent injury group
| Biomarkers |
| C4d | C3bBbP | sTCC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-1β | 112 |
|
|
|
| IL-6 | 112 |
|
|
|
| IL-8 | 112 |
| 0.183 (0.054) |
|
| TNF-α | 112 |
|
|
|
| sGAG | 181 | 0.108 (0.148) | 0.092 (0.218) | 0.132 (0.077) |
| ARGS | 111 | −0.023 (0.811) | −0.113 (0.238) | 0.176 (0.065) |
| COMP | 112 | −0.019 (0.845) | −0.149 (0.116) | −0.057(0.549) |
| C2C | 164 |
| −0.101 (0.197) | −0.085 (0.279) |
| Osteocalcin | 112 |
|
| 0.016 (0.871) |
| SPARC | 112 |
|
|
|
| Osteopontin | 112 | 0.167 (0.079) | 0.098 (0.302) | 0.165 (0.083) |
Abbreviations: IL Interleukin, TNF-α Tumour necrosis factor α, sGAG Sulfated glycosaminoglycan, ARGS ARGS-aggrecan, COMP Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, C2C Type II collagen epitope, SPARC Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine, sTCC Soluble terminal complement complex
Correlation using Spearman rho (r s), between synovial fluid biomarkers was analysed in samples from the recent injury group (0–83 days after injury). Significant correlations (p < 0.05) are shown in boldface type. The table shows r s with p values in brackets. References to biomarkers: cytokines, ARGS, sGAG, osteocalcin, SPARC, osteopontin [14], COMP [19], C2C [23]
C4d, C3bBbP, sTCC concentrations in the recent injury group in relation to structural features
| Any OC fracture ( | vs. | No OC fracture ( | vs. | OC fracture with disrupted cortical bone ( | vs. | OC fracture without disrupted cortical bone ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (95 % CI) |
| Mean (95 % CI) |
| Mean (95 % CI) |
| Mean (95 % CI) | |
| C4d | 38.90 (32.01–47.29) |
| 23.92 (15.17–37.70) |
| 45.42 (33.95–60.79) |
| 31.76 (25.00–40.35) |
| C3bBbP | 235.61 (203.19–273.15) | 0.478 | 213.60 (162.33–281.06) | 0.612 | 237.30 (195.79–287.61) | 0.637 | 233.35 (182.64–298.19) |
| sTCC | 12.81 (11.35–14.47) |
| 9.27 (7.20–11.94) |
| 14.26 (12.20–16.68) | 0.056 | 11.13 (9.20–13.46) |
| ACL injury | vs. | No ACL injury ( | |||||
| Mean (95 % CI) |
| Mean (95 % CI) | |||||
| C4d | 34.34 (28.39–41.52) | 0.418 | 31.86 (20.87–48.66) | ||||
| C3bBbP | 231.42 (198.93–269.28) | 0.417 | 223.67 (174.62–286.48) | ||||
| sTCC | 11.53 (10.26–12.97) | 0.885 | 11.61 (9.08–14.85) | ||||
| Meniscal tear ( | vs. | No meniscal tear ( | |||||
| Mean (95 % CI) |
| Mean (95 % CI) | |||||
| C4d | 29.36 (21.57–39.98) | 0.565 | 36.86 (28.42–47.80) | ||||
| C3bBbP | 204.27 (172.78–241.49) | 0.399 | 249.23 (205.21–302.69) | ||||
| sTCC | 9.91 (8.46–11.62) |
| 13.05 (11.08–15.37) |
Abbreviations: ACL Anterior cruciate ligament, OC Osteochondral, sTCC Soluble terminal complement complex
Magnetic resonance imaging results were available for a subfraction of the recent injury group (n = 98). Between-groups statistical testing was performed using analysis of covariance of log10-transformed concentrations with adjustment for days between the injury and synovial fluid aspiration, age at injury, and sex. Significant differences (p < 0.05) are shown in boldface type. Concentrations in complement activation units are presented as linear data as means with 95 % CI in brackets