| Literature DB >> 27716154 |
Hamid Galehdari1, Samira Negahdari2, Mahnaz Kesmati2, Anahita Rezaie3, Gholamreza Shariati4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Wound healing is often impaired in diabetic animals and humans. Matrix metalloproteases act as pro-inflammatory agents in physiological wound healing pathways by stimulating cytokines including the interleukins, IL6, IL1A and IL1B, and the tumor necrosis factor and transforming growth factor beta1. Botanicals are traditionally used to assist healing of different types of wounds, because they produce fewer side effects. Our specific aim here was to develop a plant-based recipe supporting effective wound healing in diabetic animals.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetic; Herbal remedies; Matrix metalloproteases; Wound healing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27716154 PMCID: PMC5053342 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1359-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Each group was classified into two subgroups including only Vaseline treatment and Vaseline plus herbal mixture. It is noted that because Vaseline was used in this study as preservative, we had have to show its putative effect on gene expression in comparison to plant mixture. Each of subgroups contain five rats (n = 5). The gene expression was measured in periods of 7, 14, and 21 days after treatment with Vaseline or Vaseline and mixture
| Time (day) | Group I: non-diabetic | Group II: diabetic | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vaseline | Herbal mixture & Vaseline | Vaseline | Herbal mixture & Vaseline | |
| 7 | 5 rats | 5 rats | 5 rats | 5 rats |
| 14 | 5 rats | 5 rats | 5 rats | 5 rats |
| 21 | 5 rats | 5 rats | 5 rats | 5 rats |
Fig. 1A 2-cm circular wound traversed both the epidermis and dermis on the back of each test rat at day 0
Sequence of designed primers for each gene is shown as forward and reverse. The primers used here for real time PCR were designed by www.GeneScript.com according their accession number
| Gene | GenBank accession Number | Forward primer (5′–3′) | Reverse primer (5′–3′) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | [NM_017008.3] | ATGACTCTACCCACGGCAAG | CTGGAAGATGGTGATGGGTT |
| MMP-9 | [NM_031055] | TCGAAGGCGACCTCAAGTG | TTCGGTGTAGCTTTGGATCCA |
| MMP3 | [NM_133523] | TCTTTCACTCAGCCAATGCT | GGGAGGTCCATAGAGGGATT |
| IL-6 | [NM_012589.1] | AGTCCGGAGAGGAGACTTCA | TTGCCATTGCACAACTCTTT |
| TNFα | [NM_012675.3] | CCACCACGCTCTTCTGTCTA | GCTTGGTGGTTTGCTACGA |
| TGFβ1 | [NM_031131.1] | CTGAACCAAGGAGACGGAAT | GGTTCATGTCATGGATGGTG |
Fig. 2Fold-difference in gene expression in tissue removed from wounds in diabetic versus control rats treated with herbal mixture at 7, 14 and 21 days (indicated as week 1, week 2 and week 3) after treatment. The diagram signifies here the increased expression of mentioned genes in diabetic rats after 3 weeks treatment with herbal mixture
Fig. 3Fold-difference in gene expression in tissue removed from wounds induced in diabetic versus control rats treated with the Vaseline control at days 7, 14 and 21 of the wound healing process
Fig. 4Fold-difference in gene expression in tissue removed from wounds induced in diabetic rats treated with the herbal mixture compared to the Vaseline control at days 7, 14 and 21 of the wound healing process
Fig. 5Fold-difference in gene expression in tissue removed from wounds induced in non-diabetic rats treated with the herbal mixture compared with the Vaseline control at days 7, 14 and 21 of the wound healing process