| Literature DB >> 27716126 |
Chandra Prakash1, S V Amitha Mithra2, Praveen K Singh3, T Mohapatra4, N K Singh1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Drought stress tolerance for crop improvement is an important goal worldwide. Drought is a complex trait, and it is vital to understand the complex physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of drought tolerance to tackle it effectively. Osmotic adjustment, oxidative stress management (OSM), and cell membrane stability (CMS) are major components of cellular tolerance under drought stress. In the current study, we explored the molecular basis of OSM in the drought tolerant rice variety, Nagina 22 and compared it with the popular drought sensitive rice variety, IR 64, under drought imposed at the reproductive stage, to understand how the parental polymorphisms correlate with the superiority of Nagina 22 and tolerant bulk populations under drought.Entities:
Keywords: Drought tolerance; Functional polymorphism; Nagina 22; Oxidative stress management; Rice; Spikelet fertility
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27716126 PMCID: PMC5050613 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-3131-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Descriptive statistics of agronomical and physiological parameters recorded in Nagina 22/IR 64 RIL population and bulks in 2011
| Plant height | Panicle length | Tiller number | Spikelets/panicle | Spikelet sterility | Single plant yield | SSI | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC | RS | IC | RS | IC | RS | IC | RS | IC | RS | IC | RS | ||
| Nagina 22 | 118.5 | 106.2 | 22.1 | 22.2 | 11.2 | 9.7 | 124.5 | 109.2 | 6.7 | 38 | 16.5 | 6.5 | 0.9 |
| IR 64 | 88.9 | 75.53 | 24.2 | 23.89 | 11 | 11 | 113.8 | 108.4 | 7.5 | 88 | 19.2 | 2.5 | 1.4 |
| Population | |||||||||||||
| Range | 69.3–163.3 | 53–151 | 18.7–31.3 | 17–31 | 5.7–24.3 | 4.7–20.7 | 54.3–279.3 | 50–198.5 | 0.97–74. | 7.4–99.7 | 5.8–48.7 | 2.2–24.4 | 0.2–1.6 |
| Mean | 129.67 | 104.1 | 24.49 | 24.08 | 12.47 | 10.6 | 129.19 | 97.24 | 12.38 | 47.3 | 22.18 | 9.03 | 0.96 |
| SE mean | 0.99 | 1.18 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.2 | 0.17 | 2.18 | 1.67 | 0.56 | 1.5 | 0.39 | 0.23 | 0.02 |
| Var | 273.18 | 346.88 | 4.08 | 6.47 | 11.32 | 7.14 | 1327 | 696.85 | 79.76 | 558.35 | 37.48 | 13.51 | 0.09 |
| SD | 16.53 | 18.62 | 2.02 | 2.54 | 3.36 | 2.67 | 36.43 | 26.4 | 8.93 | 23.63 | 6.12 | 3.68 | 0.29 |
| CV | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.72 | 0.5 | 0.28 | 0.41 | 0.31 |
| 41 RILs | |||||||||||||
| Mean | 125.3 | 102.4 | 24 | 23.6 | 12.6 | 11.1 | 122.3 | 94.5 | 10.05 | 53.21 | 22.91 | 9.21 | 0.95 |
| Range | 81.7–157.3 | 73–151 | 18.7–28.3 | 20.7–29.7 | 5.7–24.3 | 4.7–20.7 | 75–197 | 57.5–163.7 | 0.97–30.7 | 7.4–99 | 5.84–35.7 | 2.2–18 | 0.4–1.6 |
| SE | 2.94 | 3.3 | 0.29 | 0.36 | 0.62 | 0.43 | 4.75 | 3.93 | 1.21 | 5.96 | 1.08 | 0.66 | 0.05 |
| CV | 0.15 | 0.2 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.28 | 0.43 | 0.31 |
| TB | 123.88 | 105.49 | 24.29 | 24.88 | 13.04 | 11.08 | 122.25 | 113 | 8.82 | 22.16 | 22.13 | 9.82 | 0.87 |
| SB | 132.29 | 104.46 | 24.13 | 23.13 | 12.5 | 11.29 | 132.63 | 90.44 | 7.43 | 85.87 | 21.52 | 6.12 | 1.18 |
| RB | 127.46 | 98.71 | 24.75 | 23.96 | 13.59 | 10.75 | 128.43 | 92.66 | 15.12 | 64.84 | 23.6 | 9.25 | 0.97 |
SSI Spikelet sterility index, IC Irrigated control, RS Reproductive stage drought stress, TB Tolerant bulk, SB Susceptible bulk, RB Random bulk, SE Standard Error, CI Confidence interval, SD Standard deviation, CV Coefficient of variation
Descriptive statistics of agronomical and physiological parameters recorded in Nagina 22/IR 64 RIL population and bulks in 2014
| Plant height | Panicle length | Tiller number | SPAD | Spikelets/panicle | Spikelet sterility | Single plant yield | SSI | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC | RS | IC | RS | IC | RS | IC | RS | IC | RS | IC | RS | IC | RS | ||
| Nagina 22 | 113.8 | 94.9 | 21.5 | 20.1 | 10 | 8.2 | 37.3 | 33.7 | 164.5 | 134 | 6.2 | 24 | 14.2 | 12.5 | 0.1 |
| IR 64 | 90.1 | 63.7 | 23.5 | 20.1 | 8.7 | 8.3 | 41 | 36.7 | 156 | 119 | 8.1 | 91 | 17.2 | 1.6 | 1 |
| Population | |||||||||||||||
| Range | 71.3–161 | 49–133 | 19.5–29.5 | 14.7–87.7 | 3.8–17.3 | 3.7–12.3 | 29.3–54.4 | 28–47.8 | 84.3–428.3 | 13.7–247.3 | 4.9–32.5 | 20.1–99.8 | 1.2–52.9 | 0.01–10.6 | 0.1–1.1 |
| Mean | 124.9 | 90.54 | 24.35 | 22.01 | 8.03 | 6.97 | 37.31 | 35.12 | 168.86 | 85.52 | 17.96 | 85.76 | 14.69 | 1.56 | 0.96 |
| SE mean | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.12 | 0.38 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 2.71 | 1.84 | 0.3 | 1.01 | 0.55 | 0.1 | 0.01 |
| Var | 242.83 | 210.7 | 4.2 | 35.54 | 3.55 | 2.21 | 12.95 | 6.82 | 2068.34 | 843.38 | 22.31 | 254.24 | 74.31 | 2.57 | 0.04 |
| SD | 15.58 | 14.52 | 2.05 | 5.96 | 1.88 | 1.49 | 3.6 | 2.61 | 45.48 | 29.04 | 4.72 | 15.94 | 8.62 | 1.6 | 0.19 |
| CV | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.27 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.1 | 0.07 | 0.27 | 0.34 | 0.26 | 0.19 | 0.59 | 1.03 | 0.2 |
| 41 RILs | |||||||||||||||
| Mean | 122.1 | 88.1 | 24 | 20.7 | 8.2 | 6.9 | 37.4 | 34.9 | 160.6 | 86.8 | 17.6 | 80.4 | 14.3 | 1.1 | 1 |
| Range | 84.2–148.7 | 51.3–119.7 | 21–26.5 | 16.3–25.7 | 5.5–12 | 4.7–9.3 | 29.3–46.1 | 30.3–42.5 | 103.7–255 | 42.3–181 | 9.2–32.5 | 30.5–99.6 | 1.2–26.5 | 0.04–4.03 | 0.21–1.12 |
| SE | 2.47 | 2.34 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.46 | 6.19 | 4.28 | 0.8 | 3.3 | 1.03 | 0.19 | 0.04 |
| CV | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.1 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.25 | 0.3 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.43 | 1.03 | 0.22 |
| TB | 123.4 | 96.6 | 24 | 22.6 | 7.8 | 6.4 | 35.9 | 35.5 | 173.5 | 84.3 | 18.8 | 49.6 | 12.9 | 2.9 | 0.8 |
| SB | 118.1 | 84.8 | 23.8 | 20.1 | 8.4 | 7.8 | 37.2 | 34.1 | 163.3 | 87.8 | 16.9 | 91.6 | 15.4 | 0.4 | 1.1 |
| RB | 126 | 84.6 | 24.2 | 21 | 8.5 | 7 | 38.7 | 35 | 183.9 | 101.4 | 19.8 | 85.5 | 16.9 | 0.7 | 1 |
SSI Spikelet sterility index, IC Irrigated control, RS Reproductive stage drought stress, TB Tolerant bulk, SB Susceptible bulk, RB Random bulk, SE Standard Error, CI Confidence interval, SD Standard deviation, CV Coefficient of variation
Fig. 1Enzyme assay results a TB, SB and Nagina 22 had more SOD activity under stress than control condition b Decreased APX activity under stress was observed across all bulks and Nagina 22 except IR 64 and c Nagina 22, IR 64 and TB showed more GR activity under stress as compared to control but not SB. TB: Tolerant bulk, SB: Susceptible bulk and RB: Random bulk. Vertical bars indicate ± SE. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (ANOVA, P ≤ 0.05) from control
Fig. 2Individual factor map biplots of the morpho-physiological and enzyme assay as obtained from 2014 Kharif data. a Nagina 22 and IR 64 showed similar variation and were in the same quadrant. TB, SB and RB were also found to be overlapping under IC. b TB, SB and RB got differentiated into distinct groups under RS
Fig. 3Principal component analysis of the morpho-physiological and enzyme assay as obtained from 2014 Kharif data a Under IC, tiller number (TN), and the enzymes, GR and SOD were found to be interacting and associated to PC-1 b SOD, APX and GR were found to be associated with SSI, SPP and SPAD respectively, under RS
Fig. 4Correlogram of morpho-physio and enzymatic data a Irrigated control (IC): SOD, APX and GR were positively interacting with each other and b Reproductive stage drought stress (RS): SOD was negatively interacting with APX and GR while APX and GR were positively associated with each other
SNPs identified between Nagina 22 and IR 64 in the OSM genes, SOD, APX, GR and CAT
| Gene | Symbola | Locus ID | SNP | Change in amino acid | Protein stability in Nagina 22 | Function |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOD |
| LOC_Os03g11960 | c.49 G > C | p.A17P | Increases | Copper/zinc superoxide dismutase, putative, expressed |
|
| LOC_Os03g22810 | c.40 C > A | p.L14I | Increases | Copper/zinc superoxide dismutase, putative, expressed | |
| c.130 G > A | p.G44R | Increases | ||||
| c.281 C > T | p.P94L | Increases | ||||
|
| LOC_Os05g25850 | c.169 C > G, | p.Q57D | Increases | Superoxide dismutase, mitochondrial precursor, putative, expressed | |
| c.171 G > C | ||||||
| c.228 T > C | Unchanged | - | ||||
|
| LOC_Os06g02500 | NA | - | - | Superoxide dismutase, chloroplast, putative, expressed | |
|
| LOC_Os06g05110 | No SNP | - | - | Superoxide dismutase, chloroplast, putative, expressed | |
|
| LOC_Os07g46990 | No SNP | - | - | Copper/zinc superoxide dismutase, putative, expressed | |
|
| LOC_Os08g44770 | NA | - | - | Copper/zinc superoxide dismutase, putative, expressed | |
| GR |
| LOC_Os02g56850 | No SNP | - | - | Glutathione reductase, cytosolic, putative, expressed |
|
| LOC_Os03g06740 | No SNP | - | - | Glutathione reductase, chloroplast, putative, expressed | |
|
| LOC_Os10g28000 | c.394 G > A | p.D132N | Increases | Glutathione reductase, chloroplast, putative, expressed | |
| APX |
| LOC_Os02g34810 | c.1129 C > G | p.P377A | Decreases | OsAPx8 - Thylakoid-bound Ascorbate Peroxidase encoding gene 5,8, expressed |
| c.1179 A > T | Unchanged | - | ||||
|
| LOC_Os03g17690 | c.269 C > T | p.T90I | Increases | OsAPx1 - Cytosolic Ascorbate Peroxidase encoding gene 1–8, expressed | |
| c.645 T > A | Unchanged | - | ||||
|
| LOC_Os04g14680 | No SNP | - | - | Peroxisomal Ascorbate Peroxidase encoding gene 5,8, expressed | |
|
| LOC_Os04g35520 | c.72 G > A | Unchanged | - | OsAPx7 - Stromal Ascorbate Peroxidase encoding gene 5,8, expressed | |
| c.244 T > G | Unchanged | - | ||||
| c.245 T > C | p.S82V | Increases | ||||
|
| LOC_Os07g49400 | No SNP | - | - | OsAPx2 - Cytosolic Ascorbate Peroxidase encoding gene 4,5,6,8, expressed | |
|
| LOC_Os08g43560 | c.670 G > _ | Frameshift | - | OsAPx4 - Peroxisomal Ascorbate Peroxidase encoding gene 5,8,9, expressed | |
|
| LOC_Os12g07820 | c.468 T > C | Unchanged | - | OsAPx6 - Stromal Ascorbate Peroxidase encoding gene 5,8, expressed | |
|
| LOC_Os12g07830 | c.266 T > A | p.I89N | Neutral | OsAPx5 - Stromal Ascorbate Peroxidase encoding gene 5,8, expressed | |
| CAT |
| LOC_Os02g02400 | c.418 T > A | p.F140I | Increases | Catalase isozyme A, putative, expressed |
| c.437 G > A;c.438 C > G | p.R146Q | Increases | ||||
| c.438 G > C;c.438 C > G | p.G148A | Increases | ||||
|
| LOC_Os03g03910 | NA | - | - | Catalase domain containing protein, expressed | |
|
| LOC_Os06g51150 | No SNP | - | - | Catalase isozyme B, putative, expressed |
I-mutant server was used to predict the protein stability changes because of SNP. Nagina 22 amino acid sequence was compared with corresponding IR 64 amino acid sequence and thermal stability was predicted
aSymbols retrieved from Uniprot database, bsymbols given by authors for easy understanding, NA: Gene sequence not available
Fig. 5Interaction network of SOD, APX and GR and CAT genes in Oryza sativa ssp. Japonica. Nagina 22 has more thermostable SOD2, SODA, SODCC1, CATA and GRCP2 but not APX8 as compared to IR 64. All these stable isoforms of Nagina 22 directly interact with each other. Dashed and blue dotted line indicates network of CATB and SODA respectively. Red, Black and Blue arrow represents increased, decreased and neutral change in Nagina 22 protein stability as compared to IR 64