| Literature DB >> 27716094 |
Neil P Jerome1, Jessica K R Boult1, Matthew R Orton1, James d'Arcy1, David J Collins1, Martin O Leach1, Dow-Mu Koh2, Simon P Robinson3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate the combined use of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted (DW) and blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess rat renal function using a 1.5T clinical platform.Entities:
Keywords: Angiotensin; BOLD; Diffusion; Furosemide; Hydralazine; Imaging; Renal
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27716094 PMCID: PMC5048450 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-016-0356-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Fig. 1Representative MRI images. Typical images from a) T2-weighted anatomical scan, with corresponding b) ADC map and c) T2* map from a matched slice, including example ROIs to indicate the selections for analysis of renal cortex and medulla
Fig. 2Representative diffusion signal plots. Signal intensity (arbitrary units) plotted against diffusion b-value for a single voxel acquired from one rat kidney, showing the fitted bi-exponential IVIM model (black line), favoured in the presence of a perfusion contribution, and single exponential ADC model (grey line)
Repeatability measurements for ADC and IVIM diffusion models
| Kidney | Cortex | Medulla | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scan 1 | Scan 2 | CoV (%) | Scan 1 | Scan 2 | CoV (%) | Scan 1 | Scan 2 | CoV (%) | |
| f (%) | 26.9 ± 1.1 | 27.7 ± 2.3 | 18.7 | 27.1 ± 3.1 | 29.7 ± 3.7 | 24.5 | 23.4 ± 1.9 | 25.3 ± 3.5 | 22.5 |
| D (10−5 mm2s−1) | 124.5 ± 7.5 | 113.4 ± 4.4 | 6.2 | 105.0 ± 5.2 | 96.7 ± 6.9 | 12.4 | 133.0 ± 10.6 | 119.4 ± 7.3 | 7.4 |
| ADC (10−5 mm2s−1) | 101.9 ± 7 | 105.8 ± 4.4 | 9.3 | 85.5 ± 6.7 | 89.7 ± 7.3 | 17.5 | 111.3 ± 7.3 | 117.6 ± 5.5 | 11.9 |
| D* (10−2 mm2s−1) | 4.0 ± 0.4 | 5.4 ± 0.8 | 24.3 | 3.7 ± 0.5 | 4.5 ± 0.8 | 32.8 | 4.2 ± 0.5 | 5.6 ± 0.9 | 27.4 |
| fD* (10−4 mm2s−1) | 95.2 ± 7.3 | 151.2 ± 33.3 | 30.6 | 81.8 ± 6.8 | 129.5 ± 29.2 | 41.6 | 86.0 ± 9.0 | 150.4 ± 42.3 | 39.9 |
Fitted ADC and IVIM parameter estimates following vasomodulator challenge
| Kidney | Cortex | Medulla | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge | pre | post | pre | post | pre | post | |
| Hydralazine | 10.9 ± 0.7 | 15.1 ± 0.8a | 17.4 ± 2.1 | 24.4 ± 2.6a | 7.2 ± 0.8 | 8.3 ± 1.3 | |
| f | Furosemide |
|
| 17.1 ± 1.0 | 12.0 ± 1.5a |
|
|
| (%) | Angiotensin II | 19.3 ± 1.5 | 18.7 ± 1.6 | 23.9 ± 2.9 | 21.6 ± 2.1 | 15.3 ± 1.5 | 13.3 ± 1.3 |
| Hydralazine | 133.9 ± 5.9 | 100.2 ± 6.6a | 130.3 ± 7.2 | 96.8 ± 8.8a | 139.3 ± 4.0 | 109.6 ± 5.4a | |
| D | Furosemide | 118.8 ± 5.8 | 138.8 ± 5.0a | 117.5 ± 7.7 | 137.4 ± 7.9a | 123.5 ± 5.4 | 141.6 ± 4.3a |
| (10−5 mm2s−1) | Angiotensin II | 118.8 ± 7.0 | 115.0 ± 4.4 | 116.4 ± 7.3 | 110.7 ± 4.7 | 129.1 ± 8.7 | 123.8 ± 5.7 |
| Hydralazine | 130 ± 6.0 | 97.9 ± 7.1a | 126.6 ± 6.5 | 87.9 ± 8.9a | 139.0 ± 4.0 | 111.8 ± 6.2a | |
| ADC | Furosemide | 117.1 ± 5.8a | 136.2 ± 5.7a | 114.1 ± 9.1a | 134.5 ± 8.6a | 122.7 ± 5.5a | 141.1 ± 5.6a |
| (10−5 mm2s−1) | Angiotensin II | 110.9 ± 7.7 | 110.9 ± 3.9 | 103.1 ± 8.1 | 102.2 ± 4.7 | 126.0 ± 8.8 | 122.2 ± 2.7 |
| Termination | 91.3 ± 9.5 | 68.0 ± 4.3a | 84.1 ± 9.8 | 60.5 ± 5.3a | 100.7 ± 10.2 | 79.0 ± 10.7 | |
| Hydralazine | 4.0 ± 0.2 | 5.0 ± 0.2a | 3.3 ± 0.4 | 5.0 ± 0.2a | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 4.9 ± 0.2a | |
| D* | Furosemide | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 3.7 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.2 | 3.6 ± 0.2 |
| (10−2 mm2s−1) | Angiotensin II | 4.3 ± 0.5 | 5.1 ± 0.3 | 4.2 ± 0.4 | 4.5 ± 0.3 |
|
|
| Hydralazine | 38.7 ± 1.7 | 65.6 ± 1.9a | 48.1 ± 3.4 | 96.7 ± 9.2a | 25.2 ± 0.9 | 35.6 ± 3.7a | |
| fD* | Furosemide | 38.4 ± 5.0 | 32.5 ± 3.2 | 48.4 ± 5.0 | 37.8 ± 4.3a | 29.9 ± 4.7 | 25.0 ± 2.7 |
| (10−4 mm2s−1) | Angiotensin II | 71.2 ± 11.5 | 80.8 ± 10.8 | 76.8 ± 9.4 | 83.0 ± 12.9 | 59.0 ± 12.3 | 62.8 ± 9.5 |
Data are reported as mean of median ROI values ± standard error
aindicates p < 0.05 against baseline
bindicates p < 0.1 against baseline
Fig. 3Timecourse of intrinsic susceptibility contrast measurements. Graphs showing percentage change in renal T2* following administration of saline or vasomodulators. Data points are mean ± 1 standard error of median ROI values
Renal T2* (ms) for successive timepoints following challenge
| Time | 0 | 2m15s | 6m51s | 11m24s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repeatability | 32.8 ± 1.4 | 33.3 ± 1.5 | 33.7 ± 1.5a | 33.5 ± 1.3 |
| Hydralazine | 37.7 ± 2.0 | 36.7 ± 2.3 | 34.5 ± 1.5 | 30.2 ± 1.4a |
| Furosemide | 38.5 ± 2.2 | 44.7 ± 2.4ab | 48.5 ± 2.8ab | 47.8 ± 3.0a |
| Angiotensin II | 34.5 ± 2.4 | 29.8 ± 1.9ab | 29.4 ± 1.1a | 30.7 ± 1.1a |
Data are reported as mean of median ROI values ± 1 standard error of the mean
aindicates p < 0.05 against baseline
bindicates p < 0.05 against previous timepoint
Fig. 4Sensitivity of diffusion-weighted imaging parameters. Individual ladder plots (grey) and cohort means (black) for diffusion parameters derived from whole kidney ROIs, determined prior to and following administration of hydralazine, furosemide or angiotensin II
Fig. 5Repeatability measurements show parameter stability. Functional T2* maps (overlaid on TE = 5 ms image) for whole kidney (a) with no intervention showing measurement repeatability, and b) prior to and 11 min following intravenous administration of hydralazine