Giordano de Guglielmo1,2, Marsida Kallupi3,4, Giulia Scuppa3, Gregory Demopulos5, George Gaitanaris5, Roberto Ciccocioppo6. 1. School of Pharmacy, Pharmacology Unit, University of Camerino, via Madonna delle Carceri, 62032, Camerino, MC, Italy. giordano@scripps.edu. 2. Committee on the Neurobiology of Addictive Disorders, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. giordano@scripps.edu. 3. School of Pharmacy, Pharmacology Unit, University of Camerino, via Madonna delle Carceri, 62032, Camerino, MC, Italy. 4. Committee on the Neurobiology of Addictive Disorders, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. 5. Omeros Corporation, 201 Elliot Avenue West, Seattle, WA, 98119, USA. 6. School of Pharmacy, Pharmacology Unit, University of Camerino, via Madonna delle Carceri, 62032, Camerino, MC, Italy. roberto.ciccocioppo@unicam.it.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Relapse to opioids is often driven by the avoidance of the aversive states of opioid withdrawal. We recently demonstrated that activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) by pioglitazone reduces the motivation for heroin and attenuates its rewarding properties. However, the role of PPARγ in withdrawal and other forms of relapse to heroin is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To further address this issue, we investigated the role of PPARγ on the development and expression of morphine withdrawal in mice and the effect of pioglitazone on several forms of heroin relapse in rats. METHODS: We induced physical dependence to morphine in mice by injecting morphine twice daily for 6 days. Withdrawal syndrome was precipitated on day 6 with an injection of naloxone. In addition, different groups of rats were trained to self-administer heroin and, after the extinction, the relapse was elicited by cues, priming, or stress. The effect of different doses of pioglitazone was tested on these different paradigms. RESULTS: Data show that chronic and acute administration of pioglitazone attenuates morphine withdrawal symptoms, and these effects are mediated by activation of PPARγ receptors. Activation of PPARγ by pioglitazone also abolishes yohimbine-induced reinstatement of heroin seeking and reduces heroin-induced reinstatement, while it does not affect cue-induced relapse. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide new insights on the role of PPARγ on opioid dependence and suggest that pioglitazone may be useful for the treatment of opioid withdrawal in opioid-addicted individuals.
RATIONALE: Relapse to opioids is often driven by the avoidance of the aversive states of opioid withdrawal. We recently demonstrated that activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) by pioglitazone reduces the motivation for heroin and attenuates its rewarding properties. However, the role of PPARγ in withdrawal and other forms of relapse to heroin is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To further address this issue, we investigated the role of PPARγ on the development and expression of morphine withdrawal in mice and the effect of pioglitazone on several forms of heroin relapse in rats. METHODS: We induced physical dependence to morphine in mice by injecting morphine twice daily for 6 days. Withdrawal syndrome was precipitated on day 6 with an injection of naloxone. In addition, different groups of rats were trained to self-administer heroin and, after the extinction, the relapse was elicited by cues, priming, or stress. The effect of different doses of pioglitazone was tested on these different paradigms. RESULTS: Data show that chronic and acute administration of pioglitazone attenuates morphine withdrawal symptoms, and these effects are mediated by activation of PPARγ receptors. Activation of PPARγ by pioglitazone also abolishes yohimbine-induced reinstatement of heroin seeking and reduces heroin-induced reinstatement, while it does not affect cue-induced relapse. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide new insights on the role of PPARγ on opioid dependence and suggest that pioglitazone may be useful for the treatment of opioid withdrawal in opioid-addicted individuals.
Authors: Janaína K Barbiero; Ronise M Santiago; Daniele Suzete Persike; Maria José da Silva Fernandes; Fernanda S Tonin; Claudio da Cunha; Suelen Lucio Boschen; Marcelo M S Lima; Maria A B F Vital Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Susan M Stine; Steven M Southwick; Ismene L Petrakis; Thomas R Kosten; Dennis S Charney; John H Krystal Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2002-04-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Mohammad Salehi-Sadaghiani; Mehrak Javadi-Paydar; Mohammad Hadi Gharedaghi; Ali Zandieh; Pouria Heydarpour; Yashar Yousefzadeh-Fard; Ahmad Reza Dehpour Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Ryan B Griggs; Renee R Donahue; Jenny Morgenweck; Peter M Grace; Amanda Sutton; Linda R Watkins; Bradley K Taylor Journal: Pain Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Jennifer R Schroeder; Karran A Phillips; David H Epstein; Michelle L Jobes; Melody A Furnari; Ashley P Kennedy; Markus Heilig; Kenzie L Preston Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2018-08-06 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Ryan K Bachtell; Jermaine D Jones; Keith G Heinzerling; Patrick M Beardsley; Sandra D Comer Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: David J Reiner; Ida Fredriksson; Olivia M Lofaro; Jennifer M Bossert; Yavin Shaham Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-10-06 Impact factor: 7.853