Literature DB >> 27714427

Response to varying the nicotine content of cigarettes in vulnerable populations: an initial experimental examination of acute effects.

Stephen T Higgins1, Sarah H Heil2, Stacey C Sigmon2, Jennifer W Tidey3, Diann E Gaalema2, Maxine L Stitzer4, Hanna Durand2, Janice Y Bunn2, Jeff S Priest2, Christopher A Arger2, Mollie E Miller3, Cecilia L Bergeria2, Danielle R Davis2, Joanna M Streck2, Ivori Zvorsky2, Ryan Redner2,5, Ryan Vandrey4, Lauren R Pacek4.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: The purpose of this study was to begin researching the effects of very low nicotine content cigarettes in smokers especially vulnerable to dependence to assess their potential as a less dependence-producing alternative to current commercial cigarettes.
METHODS: Participants were 26 adult, daily cigarette smokers from one of three populations: economically disadvantaged women of reproductive age (n = 9), opioid-dependent individuals (n = 11), and individuals with affective disorders (n = 6). Participants completed fourteen 2-4-h experimental sessions in a within-subjects research design. Sessions were conducted following brief smoking abstinence. Four research cigarettes varying in nicotine content (0.4, 2.4, 5.2, and 15.8 mg/g) were studied under double-blind conditions, assessing smoking topography, subjective effects, and relative reinforcing effects of varying doses in concurrent choice tests. Results were collapsed across vulnerable populations and analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA.
RESULTS: No significant differences between doses were discernible in smoking topography. All doses were equi-effective at reducing nicotine withdrawal. Ratings of satisfaction from smoking were lower at the 0.4 compared to 15.8 mg/g dose. Participants preferred the 15.8 mg/g dose over the 0.4 and 2.4 but not the 5.2 mg/g doses in concurrent choice testing; no differences between the two lowest doses were noted.
CONCLUSIONS: All cigarettes effectively reduced nicotine withdrawal with no differences in smoking topography, suggesting minimal compensatory smoking. Dependence potential was lowest at the 0.4 mg/g dose. These initial results are promising regarding the feasibility of lowering nicotine content in cigarettes to very low levels in vulnerable populations without untoward effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abuse liability; Acute exposure; Cigarette smoking; Concurrent choice testing; Nicotine; Nicotine dependence; Nicotine withdrawal; Smoking topography; Tobacco; Very low nicotine content cigarettes; Vulnerable populations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27714427      PMCID: PMC5203959          DOI: 10.1007/s00213-016-4438-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  28 in total

1.  Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings.

Authors:  L S Cox; S T Tiffany; A G Christen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Modeling drug consumption in the clinic using simulation procedures: demand for heroin and cigarettes in opioid-dependent outpatients.

Authors:  E A Jacobs; W K Bickel
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Further validation of a cigarette purchase task for assessing the relative reinforcing efficacy of nicotine in college smokers.

Authors:  James MacKillop; James G Murphy; Lara A Ray; Daniel T A Eisenberg; Stephen A Lisman; J Koji Lum; David S Wilson
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 4.  Sex differences in nicotine reinforcement and reward: influences on the persistence of tobacco smoking.

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2009

5.  Transient compensatory smoking in response to placebo cigarettes.

Authors:  David A Macqueen; Bryan W Heckman; Melissa D Blank; Kate Janse Van Rensburg; David E Evans; David J Drobes
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Cognitive effects of very low nicotine content cigarettes, with and without nicotine replacement, in smokers with schizophrenia and controls.

Authors:  Christopher G AhnAllen; L Cinnamon Bidwell; Jennifer W Tidey
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction. The implications for tobacco regulation.

Authors:  N L Benowitz; J E Henningfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Smoking and mental illness: results from population surveys in Australia and the United States.

Authors:  David Lawrence; Francis Mitrou; Stephen R Zubrick
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptor occupancy: effect of smoking a denicotinized cigarette.

Authors:  Arthur L Brody; Mark A Mandelkern; Matthew R Costello; Anna L Abrams; David Scheibal; Judah Farahi; Edythe D London; Richard E Olmstead; Jed E Rose; Alexey G Mukhin
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2008-08-18       Impact factor: 5.176

10.  Urine nicotine metabolite concentrations in relation to plasma cotinine during low-level nicotine exposure.

Authors:  Neal L Benowitz; Katherine M Dains; Delia Dempsey; Brenda Herrera; Lisa Yu; Peyton Jacob
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 4.244

View more
  24 in total

1.  Response to reduced nicotine content cigarettes among smokers differing in tobacco dependence severity.

Authors:  Stephen T Higgins; Cecilia L Bergeria; Danielle R Davis; Joanna M Streck; Andrea C Villanti; John R Hughes; Stacey C Sigmon; Jennifer W Tidey; Sarah H Heil; Diann E Gaalema; Maxine L Stitzer; Jeff S Priest; Joan M Skelly; Derek D Reed; Janice Y Bunn; Morgan A Tromblee; Christopher A Arger; Mollie E Miller
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Preliminary test of cigarette nicotine discrimination threshold in non-dependent versus dependent smokers.

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins; Nicole Kunkle; Joshua L Karelitz; K A Perkins; N Kunkle; J L Karelitz
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 3.  Reducing tobacco use among women of childbearing age: Contributions of tobacco regulatory science and tobacco control.

Authors:  Allison N Kurti
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 4.  Achieving Smoking Cessation Among Persons with Opioid Use Disorder.

Authors:  Cynthia Vlad; Julia H Arnsten; Shadi Nahvi
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  Simulating demand for cigarettes among pregnant women: A Low-Risk method for studying vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Stephen T Higgins; Derek D Reed; Ryan Redner; Joan M Skelly; Ivori A Zvorsky; Allison N Kurti
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes and Cannabis Use in Vulnerable Populations.

Authors:  Maria A Parker; Joanna M Streck; Cecilia L Bergeria; Janice Y Bunn; Diann E Gaalema; Danielle R Davis; Anthony J Barrows; Stacey C Sigmon; Jennifer W Tidey; Sarah H Heil; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2018-09

7.  Effects of immediate versus gradual nicotine reduction in cigarettes on biomarkers of biological effects.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Xianghua Luo; Alisa K Heskin; Mei Kuen Tang; Steven G Carmella; Joni Jensen; Jason D Robinson; Ryan Vandrey; David J Drobes; Andrew A Strasser; Mustafa al'Absi; Scott Leischow; Paul M Cinciripini; Joseph Koopmeiners; Joshua Ikuemonisan; Neal L Benowitz; Eric C Donny; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Evaluating the utility of the modified cigarette evaluation questionnaire and cigarette purchase task for predicting acute relative reinforcing efficacy of cigarettes varying in nicotine content.

Authors:  Cecilia L Bergeria; Sarah H Heil; Danielle R Davis; Joanna M Streck; Stacey C Sigmon; Janice Y Bunn; Jennifer W Tidey; Chris A Arger; Derek D Reed; Thomas Gallagher; John R Hughes; Diann E Gaalema; Maxine L Stitzer; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Posttraumatic stress disorder and tobacco use: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Irene Pericot-Valverde; Rebecca J Elliott; Mollie E Miller; Jennifer W Tidey; Diann E Gaalema
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 10.  A review of tobacco regulatory science research on vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Stephen T Higgins; Allison N Kurti; Marissa Palmer; Jennifer W Tidey; Antonio Cepeda-Benito; Maria R Cooper; Nicolle M Krebs; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Joy L Hart; Cassandra A Stanton
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.