Literature DB >> 2771320

Stereoscopic depth perception by static stereo-deficient observers in dynamic displays with constant and changing disparity.

M W Rouse1, J S Tittle, M L Braunstein.   

Abstract

The performance of 11 static stereo-deficient subjects and 11 static stereo-normal subjects was compared on two types of dynamic stereo displays--one where disparities were constant during motion and one where disparities changed continuously. Computer-generated displays simulating horizontal motion of figures at different depths or rotation of figures about a vertical axis were viewed through a Brewster stereoscope. About one-half of the subjects in our static stereo-deficient sample were able to make depth judgments on the basis of disparity in both types of dynamic displays. The clinical feature which appeared to distinguish those static stereo-deficient subjects who could use disparity information in dynamic displays from those who could not was early onset constant strabismus. These results indicate that a complete evaluation of stereo ability should include tests with dynamic displays, possibly including both constant and changing disparities.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2771320     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198906000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  8 in total

1.  Recovery of 3-D shape from binocular disparity and structure from motion.

Authors:  J S Tittle; M L Braunstein
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-08

2.  Disambiguating Necker cube rotation using a location cue: what types of spatial location signal can the visual system learn?

Authors:  Sarah Harrison; Benjamin Backus
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Uninformative visual experience establishes long term perceptual bias.

Authors:  S J Harrison; B T Backus
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Disambiguation of Necker cube rotation by monocular and binocular depth cues: relative effectiveness for establishing long-term bias.

Authors:  Sarah J Harrison; Benjamin T Backus; Anshul Jain
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A limited role for suppression in the central field of individuals with strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Gurvinder K Panesar; Andrew J Scally; Ian E Pacey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Binocular summation and other forms of non-dominant eye contribution in individuals with strabismic amblyopia during habitual viewing.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Gurvinder K Panesar; Andrew J Scally; Ian E Pacey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Extended stereopsis evaluation of professional and amateur soccer players and subjects without soccer background.

Authors:  Jan Paulus; Jie Tong; Joachim Hornegger; Michael Schmidt; Björn Eskofier; Georg Michelson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-20

8.  Depth Perception with a Newly Developed Microscope Stereotest.

Authors:  Kayo Shinomiya; Takashi Fujikado; Akiko Kitora; Satoe Okamoto; Akiko Iwata; Yoko Ogushi; Yoshinori Mitamura
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.