Literature DB >> 27712934

Effects of TiO2 nanoparticles and sunscreens on coastal marine microalgae: Ultraviolet radiation is key variable for toxicity assessment.

M Sendra1, D Sánchez-Quiles2, J Blasco3, I Moreno-Garrido3, L M Lubián3, S Pérez-García3, A Tovar-Sánchez4.   

Abstract

Given the large numbers of sunbathers on beaches, sunscreen compounds are being released into the coastal aquatic environment in significant amounts. Until now the effect of these potential pollutants on microbiota has been not well-known. Phytoplankton is a key component of the microbiota community. It forms the basis of the aquatic trophic networks, and any change in the natural population of phytoplankton can affect the structure of aquatic biota. This paper describes an experiment performed outdoors (in natural sunlight conditions including ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and with UVR blocked) on mixed microalgae populations (four species from different key marine taxonomic groups, Nannochloropsis gaditana, Chaetoceros gracilis, Pleurochrysis roscoffensis and Amphidinium carterae), for three days, exposed to a range of concentrations of three commercial sunscreens (with variable TiO2 concentrations: highest concentration for sunscreen C, followed by sunscreen A; and sunscreen B did not contain TiO2 in its composition). With regard to UVR effect, in the absence of sunscreens, the most sensitive species is the centric diatom, Chaetoceros gracilis, and the least is Nannochloropsis gaditana; this last species presented the same behavior in the absence of UVR and with high sunscreen concentrations. The toxicity gradient obtained for sunscreens and nanoparticles under UVR is: TiO2 NPs>Sunscreen C>Sunscreen A>Sunscreen B. The differential sensitivity of microalgae to sunscreens and TiO2 NPs can produce a change in the dynamics of phytoplankton populations and provoke undesirable ecological effects (such as giving dinoflagellates more prominence). The effects of UVR, commonly neglected in bioassays, could alter the results in important ways and should be considered when performing environmentally-relevant bioassays. The toxicity mediated by hydrogen peroxide production associated with the concentration of TiO2 NPs cannot be considered the only factor responsible for the toxicity: the organic compounds in the sunscreens must also be taken into account. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Marine phytoplankton; Peroxides; Population drift; Sunscreens; TiO(2) nanoparticles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27712934     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  6 in total

1.  Environmental effects of ozone depletion, UV radiation and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, update 2017.

Authors:  A F Bais; R M Lucas; J F Bornman; C E Williamson; B Sulzberger; A T Austin; S R Wilson; A L Andrady; G Bernhard; R L McKenzie; P J Aucamp; S Madronich; R E Neale; S Yazar; A R Young; F R de Gruijl; M Norval; Y Takizawa; P W Barnes; T M Robson; S A Robinson; C L Ballaré; S D Flint; P J Neale; S Hylander; K C Rose; S-Å Wängberg; D-P Häder; R C Worrest; R G Zepp; N D Paul; R M Cory; K R Solomon; J Longstreth; K K Pandey; H H Redhwi; A Torikai; A M Heikkilä
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  The ancillary effects of nanoparticles and their implications for nanomedicine.

Authors:  Evan P Stater; Ali Y Sonay; Cassidy Hart; Jan Grimm
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 40.523

Review 3.  Visible light. Part II: Photoprotection against visible and ultraviolet light.

Authors:  Amaris N Geisler; Evan Austin; Julie Nguyen; Iltefat Hamzavi; Jared Jagdeo; Henry W Lim
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 4.  Environmental Fate and Toxicity of Sunscreen-Derived Inorganic Ultraviolet Filters in Aquatic Environments: A Review.

Authors:  Shengwu Yuan; Jingying Huang; Xia Jiang; Yuxiong Huang; Xiaoshan Zhu; Zhonghua Cai
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 5.076

5.  Metabolic alterations in alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii exposed to nTiO2 materials.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Mengting Li; Weiwei Li; Arturo A Keller; Vera I Slaveykova
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 6.  From Sea to Skin: Is There a Future for Natural Photoprotectants?

Authors:  Alfonsina Milito; Immacolata Castellano; Elisabetta Damiani
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.118

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.