Literature DB >> 27712867

The water productivity score (WPS) at global and regional level: Methodology and first results from remote sensing measurements of wheat, rice and maize.

Wim G M Bastiaanssen1, Pasquale Steduto2.   

Abstract

Scarce water resources are one of the major constraints to achieve more food production. Food production needs therefore also to be evaluated in terms of water consumption, besides the conventional unit of land. Crop Water Productivity (CWP) is defined as the crop yield per unit of water evaporated. Contrary to crop yield, local benchmark values for CWP do not exist. This paper shows how operational earth observation satellites can measure CWP indirectly on a pixel-by-pixel basis, which provides an opportunity to define local, regional and global benchmark values. In analogy to a grading system for earthquakes (Richter) or wind force (Beaufort), a grading system for CWP is introduced: the Water Productivity Score (WPS). A regional scale WPS and a global version - Global Water Productivity Score (GWPS) - are presented. Crop yield zones are used to reflect local production potential, which reflects also the presence of irrigation systems besides general physio-graphical conditions. The 99th percentiles of climatic normalized CWP values at global scale are 2.45, 2.3 and 4.9kgm-3 for wheat, rice and maize respectively. There is significant scope to produce the same - or more - food from less water resources, provided that locally specific best on-farm practices are implemented. At the upstream level, Governments can use (G)WPS to define national water and food policies and use it as a means to report to the Sustainable Development Goal standards. At the downstream level, WPS helps to improve on-farm water management practices by growers, both for rainfed and irrigated crops. While the current paper is based on wheat, rice and maize, the same framework can be expanded to potatoes, sugarbeet, sugarcane, fruit trees, cotton and other crops.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crop water productivity; Crop yield; Evapotranspiration; Remote sensing; WPS

Year:  2016        PMID: 27712867     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

1.  The scarcity-weighted water footprint provides unreliable water sustainability scoring.

Authors:  Davy Vanham; Mesfin M Mekonnen
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Water productivity of rainfed maize and wheat: A local to global perspective.

Authors:  Juan I Rattalino Edreira; Nicolas Guilpart; Victor Sadras; Kenneth G Cassman; Martin K van Ittersum; René L M Schils; Patricio Grassini
Journal:  Agric For Meteorol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.734

3.  Closing water productivity gaps to achieve food and water security for a global maize supply.

Authors:  Huifang Zheng; Qianqian Bian; Yulong Yin; Hao Ying; Qinghua Yang; Zhenling Cui
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.