Literature DB >> 27710159

A population-based study on incidence rates, Lauren distribution, stage distribution, treatment, and long-term outcomes for gastric adenocarcinoma in Central Norway 2001-2011.

Erling A Bringeland1, Hans H Wasmuth1, Patricia Mjønes2,3, Tor Å Myklebust4, Jon E Grønbech1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Population-based studies for gastric adenocarcinoma are scarce, particularly studies conducted within a defined geographical area with publicly available censuses that allow incidence rates to be calculated.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Population-based study in Central Norway from 2001 to 2011, covering a population of 636 000-680 000, respectively. Patients were identified through the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Patient Register, and were characterized by data from individual electronic patient records. Outcomes were compared across the early and the late half of the study period.
RESULTS: A total of 878 patients were identified with a median age of 76.2 years. The male to female ratio was 1.72. Annual world age-standardized incidence was 8.0/105 and 3.6/105, respectively. The Lauren diffuse type was significantly more frequent among patients below 60 years, among females and for non-cardia cancers, compared to their counterparts (p < .001). The Lauren mixed type had a stable proportion of around 13% irrespective of age, sex or tumor location. Early gastric cancers (EGC) represented 8.3% of the cases, whereas 44% of all patients were diagnosed with metastatic disease. In males, the proportion of cardia cancers increased from 29.7% to 39.1% during the study period (p = .005). The five-year overall survival was 16%, and was substantially better for the Lauren intestinal type compared to the diffuse type, log-rank p = .003. The R0-R1 resection rate was 39%, with a corresponding five-year survival of 40.9%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides population-derived data lacking in hospital-based studies. Lauren categories with epidemiological aspects and clinical outcomes are displayed. Gastric cancer was associated with a dismal prognosis. Few patients had EGC and close to 50% had metastatic disease. Many were too old or frail to be considered for surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27710159     DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1227086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  7 in total

1.  Evaluating TNM stage prognostic ability in a population-based cohort of gastric adenocarcinoma patients in a low-incidence country.

Authors:  Alyson L Mahar; Brandon Zagorski; Daniel Kagedan; Matthew Dixon; Abraham El-Sedfy; Jovanka Vasilevska-Ristovska; Daniela Cortinovis; Corwyn Rowsell; Calvin Law; Lucy Helyer; Lawrence Paszat; Natalie Coburn
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2018-08-08

2.  Development and validation of a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-based prognostic nomogram for predicting survival in gastric cancer with multi-organ metastases.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Chuan Liu; Wancong Wang; Binglu Huang; Rong Yu; Mengting Huang; Weiguo Dong
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 0.496

3.  Clinicopathological differences, risk factors and prognostic scores for western patients with intestinal and diffuse-type gastric cancer.

Authors:  Cristina Díaz Del Arco; Lourdes Estrada Muñoz; Luis Ortega Medina; Elena Molina Roldán; M Ángeles Cerón Nieto; Soledad García Gómez de Las Heras; M Jesús Fernández Aceñero
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Does histology really influence gastric cancer prognosis?

Authors:  Carrie Luu; Ram Thapa; Katherine Woo; Domenico Coppola; Khaldoun Almhanna; Jose M Pimiento; Dung-Tsa Chen; Daissy Dominguez Marquez; Pamela J Hodul
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-12

5.  A clinical model to predict distant metastasis in patients with superficial gastric cancer with negative lymph node metastasis and a survival analysis for patients with metastasis.

Authors:  Jingyu Chen; Lunpo Wu; Zizhen Zhang; Sheng Zheng; Yifeng Lin; Ning Ding; Jiawei Sun; Liuhong Shi; Meng Xue
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 6.  Poorly cohesive cells gastric carcinoma including signet-ring cell cancer: Updated review of definition, classification and therapeutic management.

Authors:  Vincent Drubay; Frederiek Nuytens; Florence Renaud; Antoine Adenis; Clarisse Eveno; Guillaume Piessen
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-08-15

7.  Sex differences in tumor characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of gastric and esophageal cancer surgery: nationwide cohort data from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit.

Authors:  Marianne C Kalff; Anna D Wagner; Rob H A Verhoeven; Valery E P P Lemmens; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 7.370

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.