Sarah J Greenman1, Mauri Matsuda2. 1. Hamline University, 1536 Hewitt Ave, St Paul, MN, 55104, USA. sgreenman01@hamline.edu. 2. Portland State University, Criminology and Criminal Justice, PO Box 751, Portland, OR, 97207-0751, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous literature has found continuity for intimate partner violence, but little research has explored continuity between dating violence and adult intimate partner violence (IPV) or whether protective factors may attenuate this relationship. AIMS: This research hypothesised a positive relationship between dating violence in early adulthood and later adulthood IPV and that support and attachment would provide buffering and direct protection for this relationship. METHODS: Data from the Rochester Youth Development Study were used to explore these questions through negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Dating violence was statistically significantly related to an increase of adult IPV. Family support, parental reports of attachment to the subject, peer support and parenting-related social support all were protective factors that provided a direct effect for those respondents perpetrating dating violence. None of the protective factors provided buffering protection between dating violence and adult IPV. CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm significant continuity between dating violence and IPV and that support from peers and family, parenting-related support and parental reports of attachment protect an individual from continuing to engage in intimate partner violence throughout adulthood. Bolstering these supportive relationships may help provide points of intervention to interrupt the link between early dating violence and later adulthood IPV.
BACKGROUND: Previous literature has found continuity for intimate partner violence, but little research has explored continuity between dating violence and adult intimate partner violence (IPV) or whether protective factors may attenuate this relationship. AIMS: This research hypothesised a positive relationship between dating violence in early adulthood and later adulthood IPV and that support and attachment would provide buffering and direct protection for this relationship. METHODS: Data from the Rochester Youth Development Study were used to explore these questions through negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Dating violence was statistically significantly related to an increase of adult IPV. Family support, parental reports of attachment to the subject, peer support and parenting-related social support all were protective factors that provided a direct effect for those respondents perpetrating dating violence. None of the protective factors provided buffering protection between dating violence and adult IPV. CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm significant continuity between dating violence and IPV and that support from peers and family, parenting-related support and parental reports of attachment protect an individual from continuing to engage in intimate partner violence throughout adulthood. Bolstering these supportive relationships may help provide points of intervention to interrupt the link between early dating violence and later adulthood IPV.
Authors: Andrea L Roberts; Stephen E Gilman; Garrett Fitzmaurice; Michele R Decker; Karestan C Koenen Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Kevin J Vagi; Emily F Rothman; Natasha E Latzman; Andra Teten Tharp; Diane M Hall; Matthew J Breiding Journal: J Youth Adolesc Date: 2013-02-06
Authors: Wen-Li Hou; Chung-Ying Lin; Yu-Ming Wang; Ying-Hua Tseng; Bih-Ching Shu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-02-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Zohre Ahmadabadi; Jackob M Najman; Gail M Williams; Alexandra M Clavarino; Peter d'Abbs; Nargess Saiepour Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 3.295