Literature DB >> 27709313

A randomized, multi-center, open-label, phase III study of once-per-cycle DA-3031, a pegylated G-CSF, in comparison with daily filgrastim in patients receiving TAC chemotherapy for breast cancer.

K H Park1, S Lee2, J H Park3, S Y Kang4, H Y Kim5, I H Park6, Y H Park7, Y H Im7, H J Lee8, S Park9, S I Lee10, K H Jung11, Y S Kim12, Jae Hong Seo13.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This multi-center, randomized, phase III study was conducted to demonstrate the non-inferiority of DA-3031 compared with daily filgrastim in patients during the first cycle of chemotherapy for breast cancer in terms of the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN).
METHODS: Seventy-four patients with breast cancer who were receiving combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) were enrolled. All participants were randomized to receive either daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim 100 μg/m2/day for up to 10 days or a single subcutaneous injection of DA-3031 at fixed doses of 6 mg on day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle.
RESULTS: The mean duration of grade 4 (G4) neutropenia in cycle 1 was 2.08 ± 0.85 days for the filgrastim group and 2.28 ± 1.14 days for the DA-3031 group. The difference between groups was 0.2 ± 1.10 days (95 % confidence interval (CI) = -0.26, 0.66), which supported non-inferiority. No statistically significant differences were observed in nadir absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (154.34/mm3 and 161.75/mm3 for the filgrastim and DA-3031 groups, respectively; P = 0.8414) or in time to ANC recovery (10.03 ± 0.75 and 9.83 ± 1.56 days in the filgrastim and DA-3031 groups, respectively; P = 0.0611) during cycle 1. Serious AEs occurred in six (15.8 %) patients receiving filgrastim and in ten (27.8 %) patients receiving DA-3031; however, none was determined to be related to the study drug.
CONCLUSIONS: DA-3031 and daily filgrastim are similar in regard to DSN and safety in breast cancer patients receiving TAC chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Neutropenia; Pegylated G-CSF; TAC chemotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27709313     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3429-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  16 in total

1.  Dose and dose intensity as determinants of outcome in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

Authors:  D R Budman; D A Berry; C T Cirrincione; I C Henderson; W C Wood; R B Weiss; C R Ferree; H B Muss; M R Green; L Norton; E Frei
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-08-19       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: where are we now?

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Jeffrey Crawford; Didier Kamioner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Leon E Cosler; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Miguel Martin; Tadeusz Pienkowski; John Mackey; Marek Pawlicki; Jean-Paul Guastalla; Charles Weaver; Eva Tomiak; Taher Al-Tweigeri; Linnea Chap; Eva Juhos; Raymond Guevin; Anthony Howell; Tommy Fornander; John Hainsworth; Robert Coleman; Jeferson Vinholes; Manuel Modiano; Tamas Pinter; Shou C Tang; Bruce Colwell; Catherine Prady; Louise Provencher; David Walde; Alvaro Rodriguez-Lescure; Judith Hugh; Camille Loret; Matthieu Rupin; Sandra Blitz; Philip Jacobs; Michael Murawsky; Alessandro Riva; Charles Vogel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Toxicity and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (TAC) or 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC): impact of adding primary prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to the TAC regimen.

Authors:  M Martín; A Lluch; M A Seguí; A Ruiz; M Ramos; E Adrover; A Rodríguez-Lescure; R Grosse; L Calvo; C Fernandez-Chacón; M Roset; A Antón; D Isla; P Martínez del Prado; L Iglesias; J Zaluski; A Arcusa; J M López-Vega; M Muñoz; J R Mel
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741.

Authors:  Marc L Citron; Donald A Berry; Constance Cirrincione; Clifford Hudis; Eric P Winer; William J Gradishar; Nancy E Davidson; Silvana Martino; Robert Livingston; James N Ingle; Edith A Perez; John Carpenter; David Hurd; James F Holland; Barbara L Smith; Carolyn I Sartor; Eleanor H Leung; Jeffrey Abrams; Richard L Schilsky; Hyman B Muss; Larry Norton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Dose and dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II, node-positive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  W C Wood; D R Budman; A H Korzun; M R Cooper; J Younger; R D Hart; A Moore; J A Ellerton; L Norton; C R Ferree
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics of pegfilgrastim.

Authors:  William C Zamboni
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 9.  Pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis vs. current practice neutropenia management in elderly breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Matthias Schwenkglenks; Gary H Lyman; Antonio Lopez Pousa; Susan Lawrinson; Tomas Skacel; Pamela Bacon; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 6.312

10.  A randomized, multicenter, phase II/III study to determine the optimal dose and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegteograstim (GCPGC) on chemotherapy-induced neutropenia compared to pegfilgrastim in breast cancer patients: KCSG PC10-09.

Authors:  Ki Hyeong Lee; Ji-Yeon Kim; Moon Hee Lee; Hye Sook Han; Joo Han Lim; Keon Uk Park; In Hae Park; Eun Kyung Cho; So Young Yoon; Jee Hyun Kim; In Sil Choi; Jae Hoo Park; Young Jin Choi; Hee-Jun Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Si-Young Kim; Do-Youn Oh; Seock-Ah Im
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.603

View more
  2 in total

1.  Is PEGylated G-CSF superior to G-CSF in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Huan Zheng; Man-Cheng Yu; Wei Wang; Xin-Hong Wu; Dong-Mei Yang; Juan Xu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.359

2.  Efficacy and tolerability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in cancer patients after chemotherapy: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Lin Chen; Fen Liu; Ning Zhao; Liyao Xu; Biqi Fu; Yong Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.