Literature DB >> 27709013

A brief history of the discovery of PXR and CAR as xenobiotic receptors.

Jiong Yan1, Wen Xie2.   

Abstract

The nuclear receptors pregnane X receptor (PXR) and constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) were cloned and/or established as xenobiotic receptors in 1998. Due to their activities in the transcriptional regulation of phase I and phase II enzymes as well as drug transporters, PXR and CAR have been defined as the master regulators of xenobiotic responses. The discovery of PXR and CAR provides the essential molecular basis by which drugs and other xenobiotic compounds regulate the expression of xenobiotic enzymes and transporters. This article is intended to provide a historical overview on the discovery of PXR and CAR as xenobiotic receptors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CYP2B; CYP2B10; CYP3A; Constitutive androstane receptor; Pregnane X receptor; Xenobiotic receptors

Year:  2016        PMID: 27709013      PMCID: PMC5045536          DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2016.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B        ISSN: 2211-3835            Impact factor:   11.413


Discovery of PXR as a xenobiotic receptor

The drug responsive regulation of the expression and activity of enzymes or transporters has long been appreciated. This regulation can affect the degree of absorption or elimination of drugs, and potentially alter the therapeutic or toxicological response to a drug. The molecular mechanisms by which drugs regulate enzyme and transporter expression have been elusive up until the discovery and characterization of the xenobiotic nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR) in 1998, which was independently cloned in the laboratories of Steve Kliewer then at the Glaxo Wellcome, and Ron Evans at the Salk Institute. The Kliewer laboratory discovered the mouse PXR from a gene fragment in the Washington University mouse expressed-sequence tag (EST) database by Gene Trapper solution hybridization cloning technology using a mouse liver cDNA library. PXR was named based on its activation by the pregnanes 21-carbon steroids. The Evans laboratory cloned the human PXR as a homolog of the Xenopus benzoate X receptors (BXR) from a human genomic library/liver cDNA library hybridized with a full-length cDNA encoding the Xenopus BXR, which was originally discovered in a screen for maternally expressed nuclear hormone receptors and cloned from a Xenopus egg cDNA library2, 3. The human PXR was originally named by the Evans laboratory as steroid and xenobiotic receptor (SXR) due to its activation by multiple natural and synthetic steroids as well as xenobiotics. The discovery of PXR benefited from earlier work published by Phil Guzelian׳s laboratory4, 5 at the University of Colorado who suggested that there are “cellular factor” and defined “DNA element” that are responsible for the drug responsive regulation of the human CYP3A and rodent Cyp3a genes in hepatocytes. The consensus glucocorticoid-responsive “DNA element” identified by DNase I footprint turned out to be the PXR response element in the CYP3A gene promoter, which is occupied by the “cellular factor” PXR. Therefore, Cyp3a is considered a prototypical target gene of PXR. The in vivo role of PXR as a xenosensor has been firmly established through the creation and characterization of Pxr knockout mice, in which the Cyp3a induction in response to prototypic inducers, such as pregnenolone-16α-carbonitrile (PCN) and dexamethasone (DEX) was completely abolished6, 7. The identification of PXR as a xenosensor also provides a molecular basis for the species specificity of CYP3A induction. hPXR and mPXR have high homology (95% at the amino acid level) in the DNA-binding domain (DBD), so they can share PXR binding sites found in promoters of the human CYP3A or rodent Cyp3a genes. In contrast, the homology in the ligand-binding domain (LBD) is significantly lower (73% at the amino acid level), which may have explained the ligand specificity between these two receptors. This notion was supported by the X-ray crystal structure analysis of the PXR LBD. The spherical ligand-binding pocket of PXR was estimated to be at least twice as large as those of the other steroid hormone or retinoid receptors. In addition, the ligand-binding pocket of PXR was extremely hydrophobic and flexible. These structural features may have accounted for the promiscuity of this receptor in recognizing a wide range of xenobiotics. Using both transfection and transgenic approaches, it has been functionally demonstrated that the species origin of the PXR receptor, rather than the promoter structure of CYP3A genes, dictates the species-specific pattern of CYP3A inducibility. These findings also led to the creation of the so-called “humanized” hPXR transgenic mice, in which the mouse PXR in the liver was genetically replaced by its human counterpart hPXR. The humanized mice exhibit the human profile of drug response, such as their responsiveness to the human-specific inducer rifampicin and a lack of response to the rodent-specific inducer PCN. Since the propensity of drugs to induce CYP3A and many other drug metabolizing enzymes are implicated in drug metabolism, drug–drug interactions, and drug toxicity, the humanized mice represent a major step toward creating humanized toxicological models that may aid in the development of safer drugs and nutraceuticals.

Characterization of CAR as a xenobiotic receptor

The xenobiotic receptor identity of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), a human orphan nuclear receptor cloned in David Moore׳s laboratory in 1994 whose physiological function was then unknown, was revealed shortly after the discovery of PXR in 1998. CAR was initially identified as MB67 from the human cDNA library using a degenerate oligonucleotide directed to the P-box sequence of the thyroid hormone receptor (TR)/retinoid acid receptor (RAR)/orphan receptor subgroup. The receptor was shown to activate a direct repeat spaced by five-nucleotides (DR-5) type of retinoid acid response element (RARE) in a ligand-independent manner, which can be further augmented by the addition of the heterodimerization partner retinoid X receptor (RXR). The mouse Car was cloned using the human CAR (MB67) cDNA probe in 1997. The identity of CAR as a xenobiotic receptor was first hinted by the ability of selective androstane metabolites to inhibit its constitutive activity. The role of CAR in the positive xenobiotic regulation was suggested when CAR was shown to activate the phenobarbital response element (PBRE) found in the promoters of phenobarbital (PB)-inducible Cyp2b genes that were independent reported by several laboratories12, 13, 14. Masa Negishi׳s laboratory15, 16, 17, 18 at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) was the first to purify CAR from mouse hepatocytes as a protein bound to the phenobarbital-responsive enhancer module (PBREM) of the Cyp2b10 gene, the mouse homolog of CYP2B, where it heterodimerizes with RXR. CYP2B is therefore a prototypical target gene of CAR. The in vivo xenobiotic function of CAR was firmly established through the creation and characterization of Car knockout mice. Disruption of the mouse CAR locus by homologous recombination resulted in the loss of PB and 1,4-bis(2-(3,5-dichloropyridyloxy))benzene (TCPOBOP)-activation of Cyp2b10 gene.

Functions of PXR and CAR beyond being “xenobiotic receptors”

As xenobiotic receptors, PXR and CAR were initially shown to regulate the expression of phase I P450 enzymes, such as the CYP3A and CYP2B enzymes. Subsequent studies from many laboratories have led to the conclusion that PXR and CAR can function as master regulators of the xenobiotic response by regulating the expression of both the phase I and II drug metabolizing enzymes as well as the drug transporters. This regulation has broad implications in drug/xenobiotic metabolism, drug—drug interactions, and drug/xenobiotic toxicity, a topic that has been extensively reviewed20, 21, 22, 23. More recently, it has become clear that PXR- and CAR-mediated regulation of enzymes and transporters can not only impact drug metabolism, but also influence many physiological and disease pathways by affecting the homeostasis of endogenous chemicals, such as bile acids, bilirubin, steroid hormones, glucose, and lipids. These new developments suggest that the functions of PXR and CAR are actually beyond being the “xenobiotic receptors”. Fig. 1 summarizes the functions of PXR and CAR in both drug metabolism and energy metabolism, which is an example of the endobiotic functions of PXR and CAR.
Figure 1

Summarized functions of PXR and CAR in drug metabolism and energy metabolism. (A) Regulation of drug metabolism by PXR and CAR is achieved by the binding of PXR-RXR or CAR-RXR heterodimers to their binding sites in the promoter regions of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters. (B) PXR and CAR can regulate energy metabolism by directly regulating genes that are involved in energy metabolism, or by crosstaking with other transcriptional factors (TFs) that are implicated in energy metabolism.

  23 in total

1.  The nuclear receptor CAR mediates specific xenobiotic induction of drug metabolism.

Authors:  P Wei; J Zhang; M Egan-Hafley; S Liang; D D Moore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Orphan nuclear receptors: the exotics of xenobiotics.

Authors:  W Xie; R M Evans
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Humanized xenobiotic response in mice expressing nuclear receptor SXR.

Authors:  W Xie; J L Barwick; M Downes; B Blumberg; C M Simon; M C Nelson; B A Neuschwander-Tetri; E M Brunt; P S Guzelian; R M Evans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The nuclear xenobiotic receptor CAR: structural determinants of constitutive activation and heterodimerization.

Authors:  Kelly Suino; Li Peng; Ross Reynolds; Yong Li; Ji-Young Cha; Joyce J Repa; Steven A Kliewer; H Eric Xu
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Structure of the murine constitutive androstane receptor complexed to androstenol: a molecular basis for inverse agonism.

Authors:  Li Shan; Jeremy Vincent; Joseph S Brunzelle; Isabelle Dussault; Min Lin; Irina Ianculescu; Mark A Sherman; Barry M Forman; Elias J Fernandez
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Differential transactivation by two isoforms of the orphan nuclear hormone receptor CAR.

Authors:  H S Choi; M Chung; I Tzameli; D Simha; Y K Lee; W Seol; D D Moore
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-09-19       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  BXR, an embryonic orphan nuclear receptor activated by a novel class of endogenous benzoate metabolites.

Authors:  B Blumberg; H Kang; J Bolado; H Chen; A G Craig; T A Moreno; K Umesono; T Perlmann; E M De Robertis; R M Evans
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  A new orphan member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily that interacts with a subset of retinoic acid response elements.

Authors:  M Baes; T Gulick; H S Choi; M G Martinoli; D Simha; D D Moore
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Characterization of a phenobarbital-responsive enhancer module in mouse P450 Cyp2b10 gene.

Authors:  P Honkakoski; M Negishi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-06-06       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  A novel cis-acting element in a liver cytochrome P450 3A gene confers synergistic induction by glucocorticoids plus antiglucocorticoids.

Authors:  L C Quattrochi; A S Mills; J L Barwick; C B Yockey; P S Guzelian
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Bilirubin in the Liver-Gut Signaling Axis.

Authors:  Abdul-Rizaq Hamoud; Lauren Weaver; David E Stec; Terry D Hinds
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 12.015

2.  Activation of Pregnane X Receptor Sensitizes Mice to Hemorrhagic Shock-Induced Liver Injury.

Authors:  Yang Xie; Meishu Xu; Meihong Deng; Zhigang Li; Pengcheng Wang; Songrong Ren; Yan Guo; Xiaochao Ma; Jie Fan; Timothy R Billiar; Wen Xie
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  RNA Sequencing Reveals Age and Species Differences of Constitutive Androstane Receptor-Targeted Drug-Processing Genes in the Liver.

Authors:  Sunny Lihua Cheng; Theo K Bammler; Julia Yue Cui
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 4.  PXR: More Than Just a Master Xenobiotic Receptor.

Authors:  Peter O Oladimeji; Taosheng Chen
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.436

5.  Impact of CAR Agonist Ligand TCPOBOP on Mouse Liver Chromatin Accessibility.

Authors:  Nicholas J Lodato; Andy Rampersaud; David J Waxman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Using TR-FRET to Investigate Protein-Protein Interactions: A Case Study of PXR-Coregulator Interaction.

Authors:  Wenwei Lin; Taosheng Chen
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.507

7.  Advanced knowledge in drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Ai-Ming Yu; Xiao-Bo Zhong
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 11.413

8.  Mechanism Investigation of Rifampicin-Induced Liver Injury Using Comparative Toxicoproteomics in Mice.

Authors:  Ju-Hyun Kim; Woong Shik Nam; Sun Joo Kim; Oh Kwang Kwon; Eun Ji Seung; Jung Jae Jo; Riya Shresha; Tae Hee Lee; Tae Won Jeon; Sung Hwan Ki; Hye Suk Lee; Sangkyu Lee
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-02       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Antiretroviral Drug Metabolism in Humanized PXR-CAR-CYP3A-NOG Mice.

Authors:  JoEllyn M McMillan; Denise A Cobb; Zhiyi Lin; Mary G Banoub; Raghubendra S Dagur; Amanda A Branch Woods; Weimin Wang; Edward Makarov; Ted Kocher; Poonam S Joshi; Rolen M Quadros; Donald W Harms; Samuel M Cohen; Howard E Gendelman; Channabasavaiah B Gurumurthy; Santhi Gorantla; Larisa Y Poluektova
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 10.  The Role of PPAR and Its Cross-Talk with CAR and LXR in Obesity and Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Pengfei Xu; Yonggong Zhai; Jing Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.