OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical utility of a novel radiotracer, 99mTc-glucosamine, in assessing disease activity of both rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Material and Methods: Twenty-five patients with RA (nine males and 16 females) and 12 patients with AS (all male) at various stages of disease were recruited for the study. A clinical history and examination was performed, followed by the measurement of hematological, biochemical, and autoimmune serological parameters to assess disease activity. 99mTc-glucosamine was intravenously administered and scans were compared with other imaging modalities, including plain X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and bone scans. RESULTS: In patients with AS, 99mTc-glucosamine scans were more capable of identifying active disease and differentiating between inflammatory and non-inflammatory causes. In patients with RA, 99mTc-glucosamine accumulated at all known sites of disease involvement. Uptake was most pronounced in patients with active untreated disease. The relative tracer activity in the involved joints increased with time compared with that in the adjoining soft tissue, liver, and cardiac blood pool. Using Spearman's correlation coefficient, there was a positive correlation among glucosamine scan scores, C-reactive protein (p=0.048), and clinical assessment (p=0.003), which was not noted with bone scans. CONCLUSION: The radiotracer was well tolerated by all patients, with no adverse reactions. 99mTc-glucosamine imaging could detect spinal inflammation in AS. With respect to RA, 99mTc-glucosamine was a viable alternative to 99mTc-labeled methylene diphosphonate nuclear bone scans for imaging inflamed joints and had the added advantage of demonstrating a significant clinical correlation between disease activity and scan findings.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical utility of a novel radiotracer, 99mTc-glucosamine, in assessing disease activity of both rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Material and Methods: Twenty-five patients with RA (nine males and 16 females) and 12 patients with AS (all male) at various stages of disease were recruited for the study. A clinical history and examination was performed, followed by the measurement of hematological, biochemical, and autoimmune serological parameters to assess disease activity. 99mTc-glucosamine was intravenously administered and scans were compared with other imaging modalities, including plain X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and bone scans. RESULTS: In patients with AS, 99mTc-glucosamine scans were more capable of identifying active disease and differentiating between inflammatory and non-inflammatory causes. In patients with RA, 99mTc-glucosamine accumulated at all known sites of disease involvement. Uptake was most pronounced in patients with active untreated disease. The relative tracer activity in the involved joints increased with time compared with that in the adjoining soft tissue, liver, and cardiac blood pool. Using Spearman's correlation coefficient, there was a positive correlation among glucosamine scan scores, C-reactive protein (p=0.048), and clinical assessment (p=0.003), which was not noted with bone scans. CONCLUSION: The radiotracer was well tolerated by all patients, with no adverse reactions. 99mTc-glucosamine imaging could detect spinal inflammation in AS. With respect to RA, 99mTc-glucosamine was a viable alternative to 99mTc-labeled methylene diphosphonate nuclear bone scans for imaging inflamed joints and had the added advantage of demonstrating a significant clinical correlation between disease activity and scan findings.
Authors: Gerhard W Goerres; Adrian Forster; Daniel Uebelhart; Burkhardt Seifert; Valerie Treyer; Beat Michel; Gustav K von Schulthess; Achim H Kaim Journal: Clin Nucl Med Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 7.794
Authors: F C Arnett; S M Edworthy; D A Bloch; D J McShane; J F Fries; N S Cooper; L A Healey; S R Kaplan; M H Liang; H S Luthra Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1988-03
Authors: Martin A Walter; Ralph A Melzer; Christian Schindler; Jan Müller-Brand; Alan Tyndall; Egbert U Nitzsche Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-03-04 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: J Sieper; D van der Heijde; R Landewé; J Brandt; R Burgos-Vagas; E Collantes-Estevez; B Dijkmans; M Dougados; M A Khan; M Leirisalo-Repo; S van der Linden; W P Maksymowych; H Mielants; I Olivieri; M Rudwaleit Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: David Yang; Masashi Yukihiro; Dong-Fang Yu; Megumi Ito; Chang-Sok Oh; Saady Kohanim; Ali Azhdarinia; Chang-Guhn Kim; Jerry Bryant; E Edmund Kim; Donald Podoloff Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: David J Yang; Chang-Guhn Kim; Naomi R Schechter; Ali Azhdarinia; Dong-Fang Yu; Chang-Sok Oh; Jerry L Bryant; Jong-Jin Won; E Edmund Kim; Donald A Podoloff Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Yin-Han Zhang; Jerry Bryant; Fan-Lin Kong; Dong-Fang Yu; Richard Mendez; E Edmund Kim; David J Yang Journal: J Biomed Biotechnol Date: 2012-05-08
Authors: Naomi R Schechter; William D Erwin; David J Yang; E Edmund Kim; Reginald F Munden; Kenneth Forster; Lina C Taing; James D Cox; Homer A Macapinlac; Donald A Podoloff Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-04-25 Impact factor: 9.236