Literature DB >> 27708765

Prediction of traction forces of motile cells.

Clément Roux1, Alain Duperray2, Valérie M Laurent1, Richard Michel1, Valentina Peschetola1, Claude Verdier1, Jocelyn Étienne1.   

Abstract

When crawling on a flat substrate, living cells exert forces on it via adhesive contacts, enabling them to build up tension within their cytoskeleton and to change shape. The measurement of these forces has been made possible by traction force microscopy (TFM), a technique which has allowed us to obtain time-resolved traction force maps during cell migration. This cell 'footprint' is, however, not sufficient to understand the details of the mechanics of migration, that is how cytoskeletal elements (respectively, adhesion complexes) are put under tension and reinforce or deform (respectively, mature and/or unbind) as a result. In a recent paper, we have validated a rheological model of actomyosin linking tension, deformation and myosin activity. Here, we complement this model with tentative models of the mechanics of adhesion and explore how closely these models can predict the traction forces that we recover from experimental measurements during cell migration. The resulting mathematical problem is a PDE set on the experimentally observed domain, which we solve using a finite-element approach. The four parameters of the model can then be adjusted by comparison with experimental results on a single frame of an experiment, and then used to test the predictive power of the model for following frames and other experiments. It is found that the basic pattern of traction forces is robustly predicted by the model and fixed parameters as a function of current geometry only.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell adhesion; cell migration; cytoskeleton; emergent material; finite elements; modelling

Year:  2016        PMID: 27708765      PMCID: PMC4992744          DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interface Focus        ISSN: 2042-8898            Impact factor:   3.906


  43 in total

1.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion.

Authors:  Tony Yeung; Penelope C Georges; Lisa A Flanagan; Beatrice Marg; Miguelina Ortiz; Makoto Funaki; Nastaran Zahir; Wenyu Ming; Valerie Weaver; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  2005-01

2.  On the mechanics of the first cleavage division of the sea urchin egg.

Authors:  X He; M Dembo
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 3.905

3.  Balance between cell-substrate adhesion and myosin contraction determines the frequency of motility initiation in fish keratocytes.

Authors:  Erin Barnhart; Kun-Chun Lee; Greg M Allen; Julie A Theriot; Alex Mogilner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cells as liquid motors: mechanosensitivity emerges from collective dynamics of actomyosin cortex.

Authors:  Jocelyn Étienne; Jonathan Fouchard; Démosthène Mitrossilis; Nathalie Bufi; Pauline Durand-Smet; Atef Asnacios
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Initial dynamics of cell spreading are governed by dissipation in the actin cortex.

Authors:  Jocelyn Etienne; Alain Duperray
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Spontaneous motility of actin lamellar fragments.

Authors:  C Blanch-Mercader; J Casademunt
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Mechanosensing of substrate thickness.

Authors:  Yu-Chun Lin; Dhananjay T Tambe; Chan Young Park; Michael R Wasserman; Xavier Trepat; Ramaswamy Krishnan; Guillaume Lenormand; Jeffrey J Fredberg; James P Butler
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2010-10-22

8.  Force generated by actomyosin contraction builds bridges between adhesive contacts.

Authors:  Olivier M Rossier; Nils Gauthier; Nicolas Biais; Wynn Vonnegut; Marc-Antoine Fardin; Philip Avigan; Evan R Heller; Anurag Mathur; Saba Ghassemi; Michael S Koeckert; James C Hone; Michael P Sheetz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  An adhesion-dependent switch between mechanisms that determine motile cell shape.

Authors:  Erin L Barnhart; Kun-Chun Lee; Kinneret Keren; Alex Mogilner; Julie A Theriot
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  The cytoplasm of living cells behaves as a poroelastic material.

Authors:  Emad Moeendarbary; Léo Valon; Marco Fritzsche; Andrew R Harris; Dale A Moulding; Adrian J Thrasher; Eleanor Stride; L Mahadevan; Guillaume T Charras
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 43.841

View more
  5 in total

1.  Geometry can provide long-range mechanical guidance for embryogenesis.

Authors:  Mahamar Dicko; Pierre Saramito; Guy B Blanchard; Claire M Lye; Bénédicte Sanson; Jocelyn Étienne
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 2.  The bioenergetics of integrin-based adhesion, from single molecule dynamics to stability of macromolecular complexes.

Authors:  Laurent MacKay; Anmar Khadra
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 3.  Bridging from single to collective cell migration: A review of models and links to experiments.

Authors:  Andreas Buttenschön; Leah Edelstein-Keshet
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Discrete mechanical model of lamellipodial actin network implements molecular clutch mechanism and generates arcs and microspikes.

Authors:  David M Rutkowski; Dimitrios Vavylonis
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  From energy to cellular forces in the Cellular Potts Model: An algorithmic approach.

Authors:  Elisabeth G Rens; Leah Edelstein-Keshet
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.